In post 346, Sesq wrote:the reason i was aggressive in earlier games is because i was an angry weird child and now am i unable to put passion into anything at all
why vote sesq if there are people you prefer? or, if sesq is your top preference, why so noncommittal?
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:17 pm
by northsidegal
also, hello huntress! it's been too long!
In post 346, Sesq wrote:the reason i was aggressive in earlier games is because i was an angry weird child and now am i unable to put passion into anything at all
including this game
volxens town
UNVOTE:
i can relate. to the second part, mostly.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:23 pm
by the worst
I'm trying to imagine an angry young nsg and it's not working...
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:56 pm
by northsidegal
i've definitely gotten angry here before. and i am young.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:35 pm
by the worst
It just occurred to me I have no idea how old you are :0
youngness is relative anyway, I feel like I'm ancient
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:28 pm
by Keyser Söze
Will go through Sesq’s posts as they are lead wagon.
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 2:31 am
by Toranaga
I'll read this and solve nothing today
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:56 am
by Keyser Söze
Sesq re-read (only 15 posts, and how many of them are scum-hunting...? )
People consistently call me LAMIST so no hard feelings reading his remark about my early question.
In post 80, Sesq wrote:you're right. if you were scum you would have at least tried to phrase it differently. and you're not new. also; town tries hard to look like town too. so theres that
after reading further its clear (i hope i dont come off as too rude) that keyser is entirely detached from the state of the game ... but not in a scum way. nothing you have said has really made any sense and ive changed my mind. vote stays
For me, this is where it began to get very hard to understand Sesq (you could label his post as contradictory or unclear).
In post 88, Sesq wrote:@irrelephant i changed my mind it was less clear in post but i dont like making post edits
@keyser its more complicated than that
Sesq explains that he changed his mind half way through expressing his read on me (hence the 'contradiction', as he's posting as he's reading and revising in real time...?). OK...
In post 96, Sesq wrote:apparently having a nuanced opinion means you're flip flopping
except for the time i did do that. in a post. whats so wrong?
Sesq has the audacity to call his post as "nuanced opinion".
In post 118, Sesq wrote:its because i changed my mind but i dont like providing reasons why i scumread people because i find the reactions more interesting
your behavior is really bad but i dont know if its scum bad or town bad. leaning the former
So Sesq doesn't like explaining his scum reads... (is this consistent with Town-Sesq?). Sesq scum leans my "bad behaviour".
In post 124, Sesq wrote:the main problem i have with his play is that it feels like he is walking into the game with a heavy amount of rigid thinking over what can and cannot be discussed and how things should or should not go. i think this is a scum playstyle because in rigidity you can form solid ideas to build off of that dont require the sort of improvisational fervour one needs as a scumplayer without strategy. that said the goals are seemingly cryptic and i dont really understand them, and it could be a weird fusion of learned behaviors influenced by past results in games, but i havent played with him before so i dont know. feel comfortable on it for now.
Still focused on me... and I'm still unsure whether what he believes is alignment indicative is actually scummy. I unfortunately don't understand his suspicion of me.
In post 135, Sesq wrote:@irrelephant it's not JUST the "stop talking about it" thing, it's the general amount of rigidity. but if this behavior is cohesive with what you've previously seen from him, s' enough for me
UNVOTE:
Sesq stands down from his vote on me, after Irrelephant's meta-defence of me.
Sesq needs to scum hunt. There is no pro-active sorting in their ISO. Where are signs of these other reaction tests? Was I the only one?
Sesq needs to look at each active player. Ok, he's shelved me to a side, but where are his thoughts on everyone else?
Sesq acknowledges they don't have any strong scumreads, but what has Sesq done to remedy that?
Sesq has only discussed slots that other players have challenged them on.
Sesq has found it hard to clearly express their thoughts or engage someone directly.
Conclusion:
At the moment, if Sesq is town, they aren't giving me much material to defend them with. I can see why there would be votes of them. For some reason though, I want to give Sesq a chance to open up (given the stuttering development to D1).
Hey Irrelephant, I'm gonna go the WIFOM route sorry:
do you think scum-Sesq would have a bit more survival/verve/urgency in them?
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:05 am
by Keyser Söze
In post 114, Keyser Söze wrote:HI GNB, just trying to put together the two following statements in my head:
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Keyser if you haven’t played wih sesq before from what I rmember sesq has a laizefair attitude and tone to their posts and keeps to themself or atleast that’s how I rmember his playstyle looking
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Although to be fair I played scum with them I think the last time I played with them
Have you played with town-sesq displaying the same "laizefair attitude and tone"/"keeps to themselves" or was that just scum-sesq?
Or are you saying his playstyle is not indicative of alignment...?
Didn't quite understand your 'defence' of him... if you agree he is indeed showing signs of his scum-meta.
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:I think keyser is being a bit stiff on all the sesq stuff
In your previous games with him, or this current game: do you think it would be rational to expect for a townie to be "stiff" in reaction to sesq's posts?
Annoyingly, we never got GameNBurger's reply here.
GNB defended Sesq... with their "laizefair attitude and tone"/"keeps to themselves"... but then said they were actually both scum that game...
this is already the towniest motherfucker on the planet
Are you just excited TW has joined, or is this t/read real? (I don't think he's done anything majorly town / sheep worthy yet).
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 7:32 am
by Irrelephant11
@NSG Sesq seems like a less than ideal lynch (not as bad as other slots, a little lynchbaity) but I was (and still sort of am, given the holiday) just trying to pop in while busy IRL. I don’t have a good enough reason to townread the slot to say I wouldn’t vote there, so I wanted to show I’ll compromise there
@Keyser that is actually a pretty good point and considering you used that reasoning to arrive at correct conclusions that went over my head last game maybe I should sheep you about it. Are you still hoping to lynch volxen?
)
