Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:54 pm
UNVOTE:In post 346, ofrhz wrote:Hi!
UNVOTE:In post 346, ofrhz wrote:Hi!
Can you reword this sentence? I don't know what you're trying to say.In post 349, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda v read how confident/doesnt give a fuck how he's read mbaki is
Mewtaph has not been involved in any real noteworthy discussions outside of his initial spats with podoboq and LolWagons. Nor has he offered many/any real reads of his own thus far in the game. Why is he on your town list if I could make the same case on him that you made on LolWagons?In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:No I think Lolwagons case against Mewtaph was fine, I was just under the opinion that lolwagons intention in having the discussion with mewtaph was to give the appearance of being involved in a semi-noteworthy discussion so he wouldn't look like a scum trying to stay out of heated discussions.
Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:Mixed. The fact that he was willing to challenge Podoboq could mean my initial opinion of lolwagons was incorrect, or lolwagons felt the the need to step up his game since the discussion of his activity had been brought up.
Are we just accepting Gamma doing the same thing thenIn post 352, LolWagons wrote:I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.
As I’ve said I just got burned by Gamma-town. Thought for sure he was scum because literally 2/3 of his posts were active lurking or defensive. Flipped town.In post 354, Dannflor wrote:Are we just accepting Gamma doing the same thing thenIn post 352, LolWagons wrote:I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.
I want to explain this better. Usually mixed reads occur because a player has done both towny and scummy things. Trekkie's "mixed" read here on LolWagons is just saying that something he did "could be either towny or scummy." It looks like it offers up an opinion without actually offering up anything.Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:Mixed. The fact that he was willing to challenge Podoboq could mean my initial opinion of lolwagons was incorrect, or lolwagons felt the the need to step up his game since the discussion of his activity had been brought up.
Because IMO mewtaph has been active, involved, has asked reasonable questions, and has handled himself well under criticism.Mewtaph has not been involved in any real noteworthy discussions outside of his initial spats with podoboq and LolWagons. Nor has he offered many/any real reads of his own thus far in the game.Why is he on your town list if I could make the same case on him that you made on LolWagons?
Based on his more recent activity, I'd say my initial opinion of him was wrong.Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.
If you’re wrong about me and feel uneasy about him is there any reason you’re not actively pressuring this slot more than the above post? Or voting him?In post 298, Trekkie99 wrote:Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
idkIn post 351, podoboq wrote:Can you reword this sentence? I don't know what you're trying to say.In post 349, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda v read how confident/doesnt give a fuck how he's read mbaki is
Mbaki said he was baiting which sounded legit.In post 358, LolWagons wrote:If you’re wrong about me and feel uneasy about him is there any reason you’re not actively pressuring this slot more than the above post? Or voting him.In post 298, Trekkie99 wrote:Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
In post 313, mbaki wrote:It is explained. It was bait. If I'm voting Podo anyways (which is a real vote), might as well throw in that. Never know.
The "absolute necessary" is everything I have to offer. I can't think of anything else to say.In post 358, LolWagons wrote:I really didn’t think someone would come in and scumread me like that, honestly thought it was really ballsy to do as scum butthe way you’re only offering what seems to be absolutely necessary to get through Dann’s questions is eroding that initial instinct I had to call you town.
You also said he's one of your scum reads in post #234. If you've changed your mind about LolWagons, why not vote mbaki? In fact, why aren't you votingIn post 360, Trekkie99 wrote:Mbaki said he was baiting which sounded legit
My scum read on LolWagons was fairly strong at the time while mbaki could have probably fit into a mixed category due to his activity level and behavior which I viewed as comparable but not equal or greater to lolwagons's. However this post by lolwagons pinged me as possible scum helping a mate which pushed mbaki into the position of possibly being a scum mate.In post 362, Dannflor wrote:You also said he's one of your scum reads in post #234. If you've changed your mind about LolWagons, why not vote mbaki? In fact, why aren't you votinganyone? You come in with these two scum reads and the only thing you do is UNVOTE LolWagons. And now it doesn't even seem like either of those reads were particularly strong.
With my opinion of lolwagons changed, I've mostly forgotten about mbaki putting him in a mixed category next to Gamma Emerald who speaking of which is mixed to me only because of his post where he criticized some chitchat but then later said he wasn't interested in discussing anything. Ignore that little debacle and he basically becomes null sitting next to ofrhz and sheepsaysmeep.In post 208, LolWagons wrote:Does scum say this? I don’t think mafia tends to say shit like this.In post 156, mbaki wrote:I have glazed over almost every Mewtaph post this game. Just the way he types I guess.
havent read any other of your slots posts yet but you have half the game as town and no wolfreads?In post 365, Trekkie99 wrote:Town: dannflor, mewtaph, podoboq, lolwagons
Mixed: gamma emerald, mbaki
Null: ofrhz, sheepsaysmeep
I didn’t see any broken tags though...In post 344, Dannflor wrote:He messed up his quote tags. I don't think there is a story there.
I ask again, why aren't you voting? You should at least be pressuring one of your mixed reads to get a better feel for them. Right now, you're doing... Nothing.In post 365, Trekkie99 wrote:Town: dannflor, mewtaph, podoboq, lolwagons
Mixed: gamma emerald, mbaki
Null: ofrhz, sheepsaysmeep
Literally just look at the post and then how he fixed it two posts later. He was trying to quote me and failed. Do you have anything useful to offer the game? I mean I townread you earlier but your ISO has improved 0%.In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn’t see any broken tags though...