Page 15 of 189

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:26 pm
by tris
If we knew what's unique about this game it would help us know how likely the scum would be to bus.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:28 pm
by skitter30
In post 344, u r a person 2 wrote:Yeah I have a completed scum game

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=78683
cold meta is cold meta but you *might* (????) be out of your range?

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:30 pm
by skitter30
In post 340, Enter wrote:Because it looks more like you're bussing on preexisting knowledge and a lack of faith in his ability.
i mean idk do scum really start the game bussing their partner before they even have a chance to post? i'm not sure i've *ever* seen that happen tbh

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:32 pm
by Enter
In post 352, skitter30 wrote:
In post 340, Enter wrote:Because it looks more like you're bussing on preexisting knowledge and a lack of faith in his ability.
i mean idk do scum really start the game bussing their partner before they even have a chance to post? i'm not sure i've *ever* seen that happen tbh
That happened to me my very first mafia game.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:33 pm
by u r a person 2
In post 351, skitter30 wrote:cold meta is cold meta but you *might* (????) be out of your range?
I mean, the game ended like a week or so ago, so not really cold meta

But it is one game, so it's not enough data for a meta read anyway, imo

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:35 pm
by u r a person 2
In post 352, skitter30 wrote:
In post 340, Enter wrote:Because it looks more like you're bussing on preexisting knowledge and a lack of faith in his ability.
i mean idk do scum really start the game bussing their partner before they even have a chance to post? i'm not sure i've *ever* seen that happen tbh

Just to set the record straight, I didn't push NMSA as a read until after he posted. I called him an ideal candidate for an rvs wagon because I think he is likely to respond to early pressure poorly as scum, but likely to respond to early pressure well as town (see newbie 1917)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:36 pm
by skitter30
huh, i'm noticing the lack of mentioning 'daytalk' in the op

oh i reskimmed the first three pages; at the time i was more focused on enter than anything else but yeah the reason why tictac's vote bothered me is that i can see it as early-scum distancing on a wagon that's building on a partner that they imagine might dissipate before it goes anywhere dangerous; it's a safe-seeming way to distance at that stage

i'm not saying it *is* this; i'm saying that it's the sort of vote that i've seen scum make before so if someone *is* bussing on that wagon that's where i'd probe further

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:36 pm
by skitter30
In post 353, Enter wrote:
In post 352, skitter30 wrote:
In post 340, Enter wrote:Because it looks more like you're bussing on preexisting knowledge and a lack of faith in his ability.
i mean idk do scum really start the game bussing their partner before they even have a chance to post? i'm not sure i've *ever* seen that happen tbh
That happened to me my very first mafia game.
ok fair enough

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:37 pm
by skitter30
In post 354, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 351, skitter30 wrote:cold meta is cold meta but you *might* (????) be out of your range?
I mean, the game ended like a week or so ago, so not really cold meta

But it is one game, so it's not enough data for a meta read anyway, imo
well, i wasn't in it; that's what i meant by cold

and that's what the many ?????'s meant! it's not something i feel super strongly or am planning on relying on; it's more something i wanted to know to try to get a gauge on what your scumgame might look like

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:38 pm
by u r a person 2
In post 358, skitter30 wrote:well, i wasn't in it; that's what i meant by cold
ahh, that makes a lot more sense

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:38 pm
by tris
In post 356, skitter30 wrote:huh, i'm noticing the lack of mentioning 'daytalk' in the op

oh i reskimmed the first three pages; at the time i was more focused on enter than anything else but yeah the reason why tictac's vote bothered me is that i can see it as early-scum distancing on a wagon that's building on a partner that they imagine might dissipate before it goes anywhere dangerous; it's a safe-seeming way to distance at that stage

i'm not saying it *is* this; i'm saying that it's the sort of vote that i've seen scum make before so if someone *is* bussing on that wagon that's where i'd probe further
Do you think this reasoning would apply to my vote as well?

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:41 pm
by u r a person 2
In post 356, skitter30 wrote:huh, i'm noticing the lack of mentioning 'daytalk' in the op
My instinct tells me that if there is no day talk, bussing becomes more likely.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:46 pm
by skitter30
not really

kinda hard to explain but tictac's felt more bandwagon-y? like the wagon was there so they decided to join it? like they wanted to make sure they got on the wagon? it's their first post and that's all they have to say about the game is that the wagon is constructive - like their first post being all about that makes it feel like that was the most important part of the game to them, like it was important to get on that wagon?

idk it's like a gut thing i got from the context and i have no idea how well i explained that or how to explain better really rn tbh

Spoiler:
In post 220, tictac wrote:
In post 121, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 35, u r a person 2 wrote:Can I suggest NMSA for that wagon? I expect you'll find that more productive, anyhow.
I've been reading through and honestly this is different from the other games I've played with you so since noone else has done much AI, VOTE: urap2
feeling good about my vote
In post 221, tictac wrote:
In post 144, Brigitte wrote:VOTE: NotMySpamAccount
I like this


^^^ these contribute to that feeling but i have no idea why

@tris

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:47 pm
by u r a person 2
In post 331, Enter wrote:
In post 325, u r a person 2 wrote:@Enter At no point was my read on NMSA a joke, or rvs read. I came into this game fairly confident that I could read NMSA off of his opening posts, and I believe I have done so.
This just makes it worse for me, IMO

I really don't like this. You said that you thought my push looked like a bus because I started it as a joke push - though there was nothing in my iso to suggest I was ever not serious.

Then when I say that I was serious, that's worse because it's a TMI read.

But you're very clearly scum reading NMSA. He doesn't have that many posts, so you're scum reading him for the same posts I am. What would cause you to think it's a TMI read?

I think you've decided that I need to be a scum read, and are simply looking for reasons to back it up.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:48 pm
by skitter30
In post 361, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 356, skitter30 wrote:huh, i'm noticing the lack of mentioning 'daytalk' in the op
My instinct tells me that if there is no day talk, bussing becomes more likely.
well i think it depends on what scum's wincon actually is

in the theoretical universe where nmsa is scum and there isn't daytalk i don' thtink your push on him looks like a bus *at all*

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 3:00 pm
by Enter
I'll explain more later, but yeah I was assuming scum had daytalk

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 5:10 pm
by Flubbernugget
In post 313, skitter30 wrote:
In post 293, Flubbernugget wrote:Reck/Enter I'm not 100% sure what to make of. R
eck's gripe that Enter's reads were inconsistent on page 2 is just as contrived
as Enter defending himself
me and reck had the same stance there so i'm kinda confused why i'm getting townreads for this tbh
Are you specifically calling out my read? In a vacuum sheeping reck would (maybe?) be scummy but you can't hobestly think I'd look at those posts and go "yeah this makes skitter town"

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 5:13 pm
by Flubbernugget
In post 294, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 287, Enter wrote:Not JUST WIFOM, I mean, but it wouldn't surprise me if we've got some hard bussers that don't trust a buddy in this one.
I have no clue how you're reading that as a bus. I'm keeping them off L1 to keep the day from ending early
@enter

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:15 pm
by skitter30
In post 366, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 313, skitter30 wrote:
In post 293, Flubbernugget wrote:Reck/Enter I'm not 100% sure what to make of. R
eck's gripe that Enter's reads were inconsistent on page 2 is just as contrived
as Enter defending himself
me and reck had the same stance there so i'm kinda confused why i'm getting townreads for this tbh
Are you specifically calling out my read? In a vacuum sheeping reck would (maybe?) be scummy but you can't hobestly think I'd look at those posts and go
"yeah this makes skitter town"
well, you and a few other people had a similar sentiment
i don't think i'm sheeping reck; if anything i'm wary about it being the other way around (or, at least, reck amplifying what i was saying to push enter for possibly nefarious purposes)

(by the bolded + context from your previous posts i'm assuming you meant 'yeah this makes skitter scum'? because otherwise i'm confused what you're trying to say)

basically i'm trying to gauge how other people are reading reck rn because i'm having trouble reading him, and my starting point for that is comparing how people responded to my push on enter to people's response to reck's push on enter

i guess my point is less about why *i'm* getting townread and more about why people are conflicted on *reck*

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:50 am
by Branson
I'm back and about to start catching up again now that I've slept and ate.

One thing I will mention just from skimming the discussion from my last post is that I'm very wary of how homogeneous everyone's reads appear to be so far. This is a pretty big sign that scum are okay with what is currently happening in the thread and that the game is going in a direction that they believe is favorable to them. Keep that in mind.

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:57 am
by tictac
In post 288, Nimueh wrote: Because both read pretty townie to me.
Why does Skitter read townie?
She's on my 'not on day 1' list for activity and rep, but hasn't really pinged me as town.
In post 362, skitter30 wrote:kinda hard to explain but tictac's felt more bandwagon-y? like the wagon was there so they decided to join it? like they wanted to make sure they got on the wagon? it's their first post and that's all they have to say about the game is that the wagon is constructive - like their first post being all about that makes it feel like that was the most important part of the game to them, like it was important to get on that wagon?
More like I wanted there to be a wagon.
urap2 was calling for a wagon while under minor pressure, so I wanted to see if he'd do something with the wagon if he got his wish or if he was merely deflecting pressure.

Didn't expect to develop an actual scumread there, and it's kinda inconvenient, because single-wagon static gamestate doesn't help me in developing reads on more inactive players.

I'm not too concerned with the speed of the wagon, but the lack of a viable counter is concerning. I think the ate from spam might mean he's not a resigned-to-his-fate-scum, so I'd expect some attempt at a counterwagon. Then again they might be going for the 'wait it out' strat?

I agree with taking this kinda slow. At minimum I want to hear more from Angel, Nimueh, Chara and Branson, before lynching.
Reck should also say something that isn't about Enter.

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:08 am
by Branson
Brigitte is looking like scum #2 based off of page 4, but that's to a much lower confidence than I feel Skitter30 is at so far.

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:09 am
by Branson
A lot of people gave Skitter a townread for the early general reactions, but I felt like her overall approach and what she's specifically saying is a lot more scum indicative than town indicative.

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:10 am
by Branson
*early general interactions

I'd also like to point out that I think her general response is something I'd expect someone with her general playstyle to do as both alignments.

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 2:32 am
by northsidegal
-