Mafiascum.net

In post 347, Donempire wrote:

In post 335, Menalque wrote:

In post 320, Donempire wrote:You might want to PM the daystart to everyone.

Well well, how interesting.
Do scum have to pick a scum member while nominating or can they nominate 3 townies?

This seemed really lamist and I don’t think dong is necessarily a subtle player who’d avoid doing something so out there

Didnt want to bring up meta but this is something i do in all my games, most of them town. I usually dont see a point in asking a question i know the answer to. I can give you some examples of times i did that and flipped town.

Also the jurys still out on the question but it seems like all it stands to do is draw ire. Fine by me.

Yes if you could link games where you did this and flipped town it would be useful

Hmm, do you actually SR me creature? If so why? Actually even if you don’t why?

In post 351, Menalque wrote:Hmm, do you actually SR me creature? If so why?

You look somewhat passive. Thought you'd be more on as town.

In post 352, Creature wrote:

In post 351, Menalque wrote:Hmm, do you actually SR me creature? If so why?

You look somewhat passive. Thought you'd be more on as town.

Eh, I overgamed accidentally and tbh this game is just less interesting than some of the others

I feel like Norwegian is angry town looking to blame someone on a mislynch. The reason why I say town is because I don't think scum draws attention to the fallacy that Norwegian trusted me despite having more meta knowledge.

Correspondence hasn't posted enough to get a read, but my vote should be there by PoE.

VOTE: Correspondence

No, correspondence votes are bad votes

How are we not understanding this

In post 355, Menalque wrote:No, correspondence votes are bad votes

How are we not understanding this

Well fmpov, it's the most likely to flip scum bc he's at null. Only 3 ppl can be lynched, me, Norwegian, or Correspondence.

Yes, so vote Norwegian

In post 348, Menalque wrote:

In post 338, Joey_ wrote:IMO we should flip correspondence, i dont expect any good content coming from them

This is badposting

Either they come back and provide content albeit in their own unique way

Or they don’t and we get a replacement

Either way they’re probably the laziest/worst slot to lynch of the three

I agree its def lazy

In post 357, Menalque wrote:Yes, so vote Norwegian

But I TR him?

In post 355, Menalque wrote:No, correspondence votes are bad votes

How are we not understanding this

Why are they bad? I can understand them even if i’m not actively participating against him right now.

Norwegian do you agree with my assessment of you?

I’m not sure.

Hey what do we do?

In post 364, Creature wrote:Hey what do we do?

If you think I am town, vote Correspondence

I have reason to flip about anyone in this pool

Corresp.: Already explained but his vote as 3rd, never came back to 2nd guess/reread the slot he voted etc. Could very well be NAI assuming the AFK is genuine, I am okay waiting for a replacement.

Titus: I said D1 that she's playing very sloppy, I still think it's the case. I gutread her play as t but content wise I disagree with about everything she has done/said.

nEE: jeez that hammer alone makes the slot worth roping so I am probably voting there today.

In post 362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not sure.

Why?

In post 365, Titus wrote:

In post 364, Creature wrote:Hey what do we do?

If you think I am town, vote Correspondence

Nah, still want to see someone actually for that slot.

In post 360, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why are they bad?

Because we have TvTvT wagons?

In post 369, Creature wrote:

In post 360, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why are they bad?

Because we have TvTvT wagons?

You think so? What is your poe outside the pool?

In post 367, Titus wrote:

In post 362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not sure.

Why?

If i should play along with your game or not. I assume you want me to vote Correspondence?

correspondence is a bad vote because Norwegian's hammer was gross and we should just lynch that while he's in the pool rather than worrying about it on later days, plus correspondence hasn't done shit in a week so voting there is an incredibly lazy lurker vote when we should be waiting for a replacement to actually make some content

In post 371, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 367, Titus wrote:

In post 362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not sure.

Why?

If i should play along with your game or not. I assume you want me to vote Correspondence?

Well that is pretty obvious given the PoE. If we're both town, then the only person who could be scum is Correspondence.