Mafiascum.net

In post 344, Gentleman 6 wrote:Please don't read L4 off of my read on them, I'm not actually sure they're scum anymore.

...was there a time when you were sure she was scum?

In post 347, Lady 9 wrote:

In post 345, Lady 1 wrote:This seems like a nothing question. I mean if you're interested in how to view their profiles sure, but sounded like you were trying to get a read off my method somehow.

Am I wrong to be thinking like this?

Many many moons ago in a galaxy far far away, scum outed themselves in the first few pages of the game by discussing the avatar of someone who hadn't posted yet in thread.

While anyone can make a mistake like that, there's something about Lady 1's measured tone that feels too systematic to make that mistake. Though the response to the question feels a bit eh.

We have to have nicknames for people all these L2/G5 feels like I am playing a chess game

You all can call me Rick
Lady 7 is Eureka
Lady 3 is Misty
Lady 9 is Robin
Gentleman 6 is Harry

In post 349, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 346, Lady 9 wrote:I was more trying to figure out why you would do that?

I did it too ftr. Was curious and antsy for the game to start.

You can be Link

In post 350, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 344, Gentleman 6 wrote:Please don't read L4 off of my read on them, I'm not actually sure they're scum anymore.

...was there a time when you were sure she was scum?

This is an incredibly bad question.

I can say that I will not be asking lady 1, 2, or 4.

Just in terms of i don't feel I can bounce well off their posting styles.

No, I was never 100% sure they were scum. There was a time that I was rather confidently scumreading them. I am no longer sure what my read on them is. Does that post really need to be asked?

Why are you repeatedly going after me forcing me to clarify things that really don't need any sort of clarification?

Lady 4 is Carol
Lady 2 is Zatanna

Harry you need to relax

I'm scumreading Gentleman 3, though.

I have a confident meta townread on Gentleman 8 as well.

In post 360, Gentleman 6 wrote:I have a confident meta townread on Gentleman 8 as well.

Gentleman 8 hasn't even posted.

In post 356, Gentleman 6 wrote:No, I was never 100% sure they were scum. There was a time that I was rather confidently scumreading them. I am no longer sure what my read on them is. Does that post really need to be asked?

Why are you repeatedly going after me forcing me to clarify things that really don't need any sort of clarification?

Because using imprecise language is bad? If you weren't sure she was scum, don't say you were sure, I don't really see what's hard about this.

Link, what do you want on the town pizza?

I'm partial to mushrooms.

You act like I'm the first person on MafiaScum to say that I'm no longer sure if someone is scum or not without an investigative result. It's not uncommon to use this phrasing without literally thinking someone is for sure, beyond reconsideration, scum.

In post 362, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 356, Gentleman 6 wrote:No, I was never 100% sure they were scum. There was a time that I was rather confidently scumreading them. I am no longer sure what my read on them is. Does that post really need to be asked?

Why are you repeatedly going after me forcing me to clarify things that really don't need any sort of clarification?

Because using imprecise language is bad? If you weren't sure she was scum, don't say you were sure, I don't really see what's hard about this.

??? tho

In post 365, Gentleman 6 wrote:You act like I'm the first person on MafiaScum to say that I'm no longer sure if someone is scum or not without an investigative result. It's not uncommon to use this phrasing without literally thinking someone is for sure, beyond reconsideration, scum.

You are special Harry.

Some say you might be a wizard.

Or a unit of power.

I'm a watt?

In post 369, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm a watt?

In post 364, Gentleman 3 wrote:I'm partial to mushrooms.

Mushrooms are definitley not up their on my favorite pizza toppings. But alright.

As long as we can have some onions as well.

In post 365, Gentleman 6 wrote:You act like I'm the first person on MafiaScum to say that I'm no longer sure if someone is scum or not without an investigative result. It's not uncommon to use this phrasing without literally thinking someone is for sure, beyond reconsideration, scum.

Well, chalk it up to differing experiences I guess, because I rarely see this (unless you're talking about people tunneling when they really aren't as confident as they claim).

Regardless, I asked for clarification because I was unsure, and clarification I got. We don't really need to dwell on it anymore.

"I'm no longer sure if this person is scum or not."

You're claiming that you rarely see people saying that?

Harry, do you think this line of questioning is useful?