Mafiascum.net

In post 348, popopopopopopo wrote:churros you really gonna just park your vote on jake the wofl? hes made 1 post, you have no reads?

Amount of content =/= Read Accuracy

If I could dayvig two players now, hmm, I would say maybe 50% of odds that at least one flips wolf but maybe I'm being cheeky...

Hm...

Churros is too cheerful.

No fun is allowed.

lol imagine if having fun was someones scum tell.
people think that of me sometimes.

well I mean, there's some scum motivation in being "fun" and "friendly" b/c ppl want to kill those slots less.

theres a big difference between fun/friendly and being nice/generally agreeable in order to avoid suspicion imo.

In post 353, Nero Cain wrote:well I mean, there's some scum motivation in being "fun" and "friendly" b/c ppl want to kill those slots less.

After popopo weebified their wagon died down. That's conclusive evidence.

In post 348, popopopopopopo wrote:churros you really gonna just park your vote on jake the wofl? hes made 1 post, you have no reads?

isn't that a reason to lowkey suspect him?

In post 355, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 353, Nero Cain wrote:well I mean, there's some scum motivation in being "fun" and "friendly" b/c ppl want to kill those slots less.

After popopo weebified their wagon died down. That's conclusive evidence.

he changed his whole posting style along with avatar aand it was super effective.

In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 348, popopopopopopo wrote:churros you really gonna just park your vote on jake the wofl? hes made 1 post, you have no reads?

isn't that a reason to lowkey suspect him?

not posting day 1 is not alignment indicative in my experience.

what if we just wagon everyone to L-1 and force everyone to get anime avatars or be lynched. I think this will help us find scum.

In post 329, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 281, Zantetsu wrote:

In post 238, popopopopopopo wrote:next his scum buddy zantetsu (THATS RIGHT I SAID IT) asks him to explain himself (COACHING?????)

I personally have never seen this mysterious thing called coaching. People talk about it in game from time to time, but I've never seen it personally.

Also scum have daytalk so why would in-game coaching be needed?

It’s got a few different names. Some call it "screaming at an inferior scum partner" or "civil war". I believe you might be familiar with this sort of issue from a certain game

But we didn't have day talk in that game, I think having day talk would have led to significantly different outcome as I like to believe we could have hammered out our strategy there in real time instead of crashing headlong into each other.

I literally read the entire last three pages since popop changed his avatar thinking that every comment he made came from you because I thought it was your avatar. You anime guys change to similar looking avatars all the time and it gets confusing. I did not realize how much I relied on avatars to associate posts with players until now.

I am re-reading from page 10 now to detangle Norwee and popop's recent postings in my head.

zantetsu if ur scumreading me. Why u not encouraging more people to vote me or something? U seem very passive with ur pressure on me and ur not concerned at all that I completely ignored ur case.

In post 292, Zantetsu wrote:VOTE: Peter Pan

wow I thought u were still voting me.

In post 352, Firebringer wrote:Churros is too cheerful.

No fun is allowed.

lol imagine if having fun was someones scum tell.
people think that of me sometimes.

It'll be the next time I roll wolf in fact

I only plan to flufly

In post 361, Firebringer wrote:zantetsu if ur scumreading me. Why u not encouraging more people to vote me or something? U seem very passive with ur pressure on me and ur not concerned at all that I completely ignored ur case.

I think I have been consistent in stating that you are one of my top scum reads, and I continue to make cases. But I can see that most people are not very interested in your slot and don't seem to be scum reading you despite what I have said. And I know that you know that so your post reads to me like an attempt to act nonchalantly like being accused of scum doesn't even bother you.

With regards to you ignoring my case, it was not unexpected and I was more interested in seeing how you would treat Luna after I made that case than in seeing your response to the case.

In post 358, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 348, popopopopopopo wrote:churros you really gonna just park your vote on jake the wofl? hes made 1 post, you have no reads?

isn't that a reason to lowkey suspect him?

not posting day 1 is not alignment indicative in my experience.

lurking can be very much AI. Now granted, there are tons of players that are like "ewww day 1!"

In post 360, Zantetsu wrote:I did not realize how much I relied on avatars to associate posts with players until now.

You’re not the only one. Last game I accidentally referred to Auro as Fluminator because Auro’a avi was the same one flum used 5 years ago and it legit kept tripping me up.

Alchemist do you have a read on Churros?

In post 360, Zantetsu wrote:I am re-reading from page 10 now to detangle Norwee and popop's recent postings in my head.

Bro. My avatar is catgirl while popX7's avatar is a mouse girl. Get yo eyes checked. There couldn't be a bigger difference.

When Churros starts calling Firebringer ugly doggo i will know for a fact that C9++scum!Churros is real.

In post 367, Zantetsu wrote:Alchemist do you have a read on Churros?

Leaning Town. Idk who they’re an alt of and I never played with them as churros before so I can’t say if them having more fun is scum indicative like someone else suggested.

No one has given any serious thought to why wed get 2 wagons to l-1

I'm sad about that

In post 1, GeorgeBailey wrote:Prodging - A naked "prod dodge" does not reset the prod timer. To avoid being prodded/replaced for inactivity, include some game advancing content in your prodges, such as "got prodded; xxxx is still scum."

can i lurk this one out until all the weebs die

In post 330, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 294, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 281, Zantetsu wrote:

In post 238, popopopopopopo wrote:next his scum buddy zantetsu (THATS RIGHT I SAID IT) asks him to explain himself (COACHING?????)

I personally have never seen this mysterious thing called coaching. People talk about it in game from time to time, but I've never seen it personally.

Also scum have daytalk so why would in-game coaching be needed?

i imagine it went something like this in scum daytalk thread:

Zantetsu: peter hop on the popo wagon, ill ask you to explain your vote while I stay off the wagon for town points. you can answer me with these points; etc.

Can i eat you?
Ever since you changed profile picture i’ve felt an unstoppable desire to playfully smack you around and hold you by the tail. Giving you just enough time to barely escape before i catch you again.

fucking haram