Mafiascum.net

In post 327, votato wrote:but isnt the increasing quality of the wagons (maybe) and the increasing information resulting (definitely) a natural result of moving out of RVS?

nauci, i feel like the two somewhat contradict in terms of internal reasoning. i think both are valid reasons. i just dont think one mind could think both of those things at once.

In post 349, Nauci wrote:

In post 344, Blair wrote:VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

That was enough to override your vote on votato? How come?

In post 348, Quick wrote:

In post 347, Blair wrote:

In post 345, Quick wrote:I say votato is Town and you vot me? Is this for real?

Your reading comprehension is definitely better than this.

Just stating FACTS, Blair. FACTS.

In post 349, Nauci wrote:

In post 344, Blair wrote:VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

That was enough to override your vote on votato? How come?

In post 350, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 327, votato wrote:but isnt the increasing quality of the wagons (maybe) and the increasing information resulting (definitely) a natural result of moving out of RVS?

nauci, i feel like the two somewhat contradict in terms of internal reasoning. i think both are valid reasons. i just dont think one mind could think both of those things at once.

Hi votato!

Going to assume u don't like the wagon on u, but u do think we're out of RVS now and ur wagon that i pushed is part of that, right? So, with 5 votes on u, who's scum? Who is voting u for "bad" reasons and who is voting for "scum" reasons?

In post 352, Blair wrote:

In post 348, Quick wrote:

In post 347, Blair wrote:

In post 345, Quick wrote:I say votato is Town and you vot me? Is this for real?

Your reading comprehension is definitely better than this.

Just stating FACTS, Blair. FACTS.

In post 349, Nauci wrote:

In post 344, Blair wrote:VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

That was enough to override your vote on votato? How come?

I don't like it when people lie. Especially about themselves.

Lynch All Liars tends to hit scum at a higher rate than my confidence in any of my scumreads right now.

Votato shifted to my null column as he interacted with his wagon.

In post 351, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 349, Nauci wrote:

In post 344, Blair wrote:VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

That was enough to override your vote on votato? How come?

Thank u for this, i was wondering who was going to blink on the votato wagon first and missed this vote change

In post 250, iDanyboy wrote:

In post 246, CantHateAPuppy wrote:VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

Shepherd me.
VOTE: votato

In post 252, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 250, iDanyboy wrote:

In post 246, CantHateAPuppy wrote:VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

Shepherd me.
VOTE: votato

I support this vote. Can we hear your reasoning though?

In post 354, Quick wrote:Please prove I lied...?

In post 347, Blair wrote:

In post 345, Quick wrote:I say votato is Town and you vot me? Is this for real?

Your reading comprehension is definitely better than this.

In post 358, Blair wrote:

In post 354, Quick wrote:Please prove I lied...?

You are welcome to read 344 again. I don't really expect you to convince you that you are scum, though.

Everyone else who reads it should see pretty clearly what I'm talking about.

In post 344, Blair wrote:

In post 208, Quick wrote:

In post 207, Nauci wrote:

In post 189, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

unvote

Vote: Blair

In post 191, Quick wrote:VOTE: Blair

I would love to see Blair Tunnel this about now.

In post 190, votato wrote:

In post 189, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

unvote

Vote: Blair

eggs, plain

Both of you: what votato said

Mine had a double meaning.

In post 288, Quick wrote:

In post 286, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 278, Quick wrote:

In post 275, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 273, Quick wrote:Disagree?

yep!

Okay, well Blair seems LAMIST to me this game so far.

See! U could have started with this instead of being coy and mysterious about it

i think u want to be all tough and macho and gruff and cool. it's ok, we're having fun too!

I've been coy and mysterious from the beginning boo.

In post 292, Quick wrote:

In post 285, Blair wrote:Feel free to explain how they were all terrible any time the motivation grips you.

Secret and shadow are my worlds.

In post 307, Quick wrote:I am not trying to be cryptic

VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

In post 361, Blair wrote:"Is this for real" is not a valid question worth answering when the "this" in question is a case that I did not make.

I didn't vote for you for saying Votato is Town. So no, that is not for real.

In post 367, Blair wrote:By the way, "You can't prove it!" is not exactly the honest man's anthem.

In post 353, votato wrote:

In post 350, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 327, votato wrote:but isnt the increasing quality of the wagons (maybe) and the increasing information resulting (definitely) a natural result of moving out of RVS?

nauci, i feel like the two somewhat contradict in terms of internal reasoning. i think both are valid reasons. i just dont think one mind could think both of those things at once.

Hi votato!

Going to assume u don't like the wagon on u, but u do think we're out of RVS now and ur wagon that i pushed is part of that, right? So, with 5 votes on u, who's scum? Who is voting u for "bad" reasons and who is voting for "scum" reasons?

are you just gonna

keep ignoring

the questions i asked you?

In post 368, votato wrote:

In post 367, Blair wrote:By the way, "You can't prove it!" is not exactly the honest man's anthem.

can you prove it?

In post 344, Blair wrote:

In post 208, Quick wrote:

In post 207, Nauci wrote:

In post 189, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

unvote

Vote: Blair

In post 191, Quick wrote:VOTE: Blair

I would love to see Blair Tunnel this about now.

In post 190, votato wrote:

In post 189, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

unvote

Vote: Blair

eggs, plain

Both of you: what votato said

Mine had a double meaning.

In post 288, Quick wrote:

In post 286, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 278, Quick wrote:

In post 275, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 273, Quick wrote:Disagree?

yep!

Okay, well Blair seems LAMIST to me this game so far.

See! U could have started with this instead of being coy and mysterious about it

i think u want to be all tough and macho and gruff and cool. it's ok, we're having fun too!

I've been coy and mysterious from the beginning boo.

In post 292, Quick wrote:

In post 285, Blair wrote:Feel free to explain how they were all terrible any time the motivation grips you.

Secret and shadow are my worlds.

In post 307, Quick wrote:I am not trying to be cryptic

VOTE: Quick

I was null reading it as an intentional playstyle thing until you claimed it wasn't.

In post 370, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 353, votato wrote:

In post 350, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 327, votato wrote:but isnt the increasing quality of the wagons (maybe) and the increasing information resulting (definitely) a natural result of moving out of RVS?

nauci, i feel like the two somewhat contradict in terms of internal reasoning. i think both are valid reasons. i just dont think one mind could think both of those things at once.

Hi votato!

Going to assume u don't like the wagon on u, but u do think we're out of RVS now and ur wagon that i pushed is part of that, right? So, with 5 votes on u, who's scum? Who is voting u for "bad" reasons and who is voting for "scum" reasons?

are you just gonna

keep ignoring

the questions i asked you?

What on earth are u even talking about

In post 363, Quick wrote:If you take a joke comment to mean something it doesn't, I am pretty sure that is Scummy behavior. Keep pushing this though, I would love to see how it develops.