Well you’re apparently not super hyped which is kinda what I’d expect given the PL, but also I know that being conspicuously ~*breezy*~ can be hard for you as scum and not posting means you don’t have to try to replicate that
Plus I didn’t say you were scum I said you could be scum, there’s an important difference. You’re kinda too early to call yet
Post 87 was very political, not in the order of people addressed but in what you said about them. Particularly Skitts/Dats/Turkey feels like there's an agenda to what was said.
98 continues said agenda on skitts.
140 feels like a completely made up reason to suspect me, and not one I'd expect to come from town you.
And voting the person I legitimately scumread over the person that could maybe be scum based on a tinfoil feeling about the similarity of this game and another, particularly when said scumread already has a wagon should be fairly self explanatory.
Bingle i literally wrote that post before the game started as a joke. I think I altered your entry because you hadn’t posted but otherwise I literally came up with the whole thing in advance.
What agenda are you talking about lmao, you mean the same approach I’ve taken with skitter in literally every game since our first!?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:08 am
by Menalque
In post 348, Bingle wrote:If it helps, Dats, in this playerlist I think Maria, Gobbles and BB are the only people who I know have played with scum me and BB is the only person who I expect to have any real reads accuracy wrt my slot.
Wow, convenient
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:12 am
by Menalque
Oh wait you mean ank, I thought you meant molla lol
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:13 am
by Menalque
I thought you were saying that only 3 people on site had played scum with you and that BB is the only one who could read you of those three and conveniently wasn’t in the game
Then realised that the math didn’t add up at all on the first bit and reread the post
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:24 am
by Bingle
In post 350, Menalque wrote:What agenda are you talking about lmao, you mean the same approach I’ve taken with skitter in literally every game since our first!?
The skit interactions feel like buddying, and frankly your opinion on that means very little. I'm far more interested in skitt's take.
I find it interesting you're this concerned about my scumread on you, though. Is there a particular reason you seem so rattled by it?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:26 am
by Menalque
I wouldn’t say I’m rattled, I’m just starting to come round to the idea that I actually have caught scum!you D1 and it tickles me
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:26 am
by Menalque
Anyone who knows skitt knows that hard townreading her for no good reason is not how you buddy her
Where did I dismiss dats and call her scum, bingle? The closest thing I can think of was me saying that I didn’t want to fight and then her saying she also didn’t want to do that but other than that I can’t see how I was dismissing her. And she’s not in a clear read point for me atm, but I also didn’t call her scum beyond saying she was very mild scum much earlier
I take it 347 was responding to the first bit of this, but what about the second part re: datisi?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:28 am
by Menalque
Pure boi and fb what are your reads on bingle again?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:30 am
by Bingle
In post 356, Menalque wrote:Anyone who knows skitt knows that hard townreading her for no good reason is not how you buddy her
But that's not what you're doing. You're saying you're going to ignore her alignment and treat her as town which will therefore let her do her thing.
We've already collectively addressed that the order of your readslist is meaningless.
In post 356, Menalque wrote:Anyone who knows skitt knows that hard townreading her for no good reason is not how you buddy her
But that's not what you're doing. You're saying you're going to ignore her alignment and treat her as town which will therefore let her do her thing.
We've already collectively addressed that the order of your readslist is meaningless.
(1) ehhh, no, not exactly. I said I’m going to treat her as town pending evidence that she’s not. If I come to have concerns about skitt later, I’ll air and explain them. But the easiest way to do that is treating her as town and trying to solve with her
(2) I don’t... see how this is relevant to what I asked?
Where did I dismiss dats and call her scum, bingle? The closest thing I can think of was me saying that I didn’t want to fight and then her saying she also didn’t want to do that but other than that I can’t see how I was dismissing her. And she’s not in a clear read point for me atm, but I also didn’t call her scum beyond saying she was very mild scum much earlier
I take it 347 was responding to the first bit of this, but what about the second part re: datisi?
Those posts in the helpfully labeled spoiler are the ones that struck me as calling datisi scum and not trying to engage with her to determine her alignment followed by a walkback of the read when she pushed back.
In post 356, Menalque wrote:Anyone who knows skitt knows that hard townreading her for no good reason is not how you buddy her
But that's not what you're doing. You're saying you're going to ignore her alignment and treat her as town which will therefore let her do her thing.
We've already collectively addressed that the order of your readslist is meaningless.
(2) I don’t... see how this is relevant to what I asked?
I said you sounded like you were buddying skitter, you said hard townreading skitter is not the way to buddy skitter. I pointed out that that is not what you're doing, because the only point where you 'hard townread' skitter is by putting her at the top of that list. I'm not sure where the confusion about why I would point that out comes from.
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:46 am
by Firebringer
i am like 99% sure ive played against scum u bingle even tho i can't remember a game.
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:48 am
by Firebringer
In post 358, Menalque wrote:Pure boi and fb what are your reads on bingle again?
minor scum lean
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:49 am
by Firebringer
In post 348, Bingle wrote:If it helps, Dats, in this playerlist I think Maria, Gobbles and BB are the only people who I know have played with scum me and BB is the only person who I expect to have any real reads accuracy wrt my slot.
this is the first time ive think u do this "X is only person who i expect to have any accuracy reading my slot".
R u doing a MariaR or Blake impression now?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:51 am
by Menalque
Fb do you think bingle’s take on my interaction with datisi (341) are good faith?
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:52 am
by Firebringer
no
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:54 am
by Blake Belladonna
I have not done my due diligence regarding this game yet, but as of now I have gotten primarily town pings from Bingle.
This is a low confidence read as of now.
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:54 am
by Firebringer
lol ok blake
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:54 am
by Firebringer
VOTE: Bingle
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:56 am
by Bingle
In post 362, Firebringer wrote:i am like 99% sure ive played against scum u bingle even tho i can't remember a game.
Where did I dismiss dats and call her scum, bingle? The closest thing I can think of was me saying that I didn’t want to fight and then her saying she also didn’t want to do that but other than that I can’t see how I was dismissing her. And she’s not in a clear read point for me atm, but I also didn’t call her scum beyond saying she was very mild scum much earlier
I take it 347 was responding to the first bit of this, but what about the second part re: datisi?
Those posts in the helpfully labeled spoiler are the ones that struck me as calling datisi scum and not trying to engage with her to determine her alignment followed by a walkback of the read when she pushed back.
In post 356, Menalque wrote:Anyone who knows skitt knows that hard townreading her for no good reason is not how you buddy her
But that's not what you're doing. You're saying you're going to ignore her alignment and treat her as town which will therefore let her do her thing.
We've already collectively addressed that the order of your readslist is meaningless.
(2) I don’t... see how this is relevant to what I asked?
I said you sounded like you were buddying skitter, you said hard townreading skitter is not the way to buddy skitter. I pointed out that that is not what you're doing, because the only point where you 'hard townread' skitter is by putting her at the top of that list. I'm not sure where the confusion about why I would point that out comes from.
(1) but like... that was all from before dats elaborated on her process for getting engaged? And so after it did (plus her engaging with me) I eased back a little bit. How is that scummy to you?
(2) I was confused as I thought that bit was also in relation to dats not to skitt
In post 348, Bingle wrote:If it helps, Dats, in this playerlist I think Maria, Gobbles and BB are the only people who I know have played with scum me and BB is the only person who I expect to have any real reads accuracy wrt my slot.
this is the first time ive think u do this "X is only person who i expect to have any accuracy reading my slot".
R u doing a MariaR or Blake impression now?
I don't, usually. I brought it up in TM, briefly, when I talked about RC/NSG scumreading me through Bmap, but I can't remember another recent occasion when I did so.
