Mafiascum.net

Okay i've done that

In post 350, MiniMegabyte wrote:Okay i've done that

Thanks

Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

I mean it could just be me but to me when people fish for information like they are doing asking for peoples reads etc, i see that as maybe wanting to know where they are. As i said could just be me but that is why I saw them as a little scum

@Mini:

1) What is your experience with playing mafia?
2) Do you prefer playing town or scum?
3) What do you think of the Policy lynch of Lynch All Lurkers?

@Mini are you Aussie?

In post 355, 72offsuit wrote:@Mini are you Aussie?

Yeah I am

In post 354, 72offsuit wrote:@Mini:

1) What is your experience with playing mafia?
2) Do you prefer playing town or scum?
3) What do you think of the Policy lynch of Lynch All Lurkers?

1) I’ve never played forum games this is my first but I’ve played games on discord once
2) I don’t mind really depends on how I’m feeling because I definitely feel being scum is more challenging
3) I think it’s a good idea personally because it doesn’t give scum a chance to hide if ya know what I mean

I would've recommended starting a game afresh as your first game. Replacing in is tricky.

In post 358, 72offsuit wrote:I would've recommended starting a game afresh as your first game. Replacing in is tricky.

Might have been better but I think it’ll be okay

OK sure, who is scum?

In post 360, 72offsuit wrote:OK sure, who is scum?

At this point TTJT seems a little scummy but that’s just cause I find people generally who fish for information like they did as odd but as I said earlier that’s just me apart from that I’m unsure.

Anyways it’s 1am I’m off to sleep

In post 361, MiniMegabyte wrote:At this point TTJT seems a little scummy but that’s just cause I find people generally who fish for information like they did as odd but as I said earlier that’s just me apart from that I’m unsure.

this feels like what newbie scum would say about a town!TTJT

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

can you answer my 256

In post 363, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 361, MiniMegabyte wrote:At this point TTJT seems a little scummy but that’s just cause I find people generally who fish for information like they did as odd but as I said earlier that’s just me apart from that I’m unsure.

this feels like what newbie scum would say about a town!TTJT

I did say it could just be me but that’s how I read it

Hey Mini,

Question. What was the point of 347? You just quoted a conversation, but didn’t say anything about it. Also not sure if I got from your posts that who scumread TTJT. Can you elaborate on that thought process.

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

Not a fan of this post.

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

I have no idea what 'analysis' you are referring to. Please use quotes, or at the very least a post number.

In post 367, UNOwen wrote:

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

Not a fan of this post.

Agreed.

I'm similarly no longer townreading DoctorPepper

I'll vote for any of {TTJT, MiniMegabyte, DoctorPepper} today, and the way the latter two are dancing around suspicion/voting for TTJT makes me wonder if he's a mislynch that scum missed the boat on and are now trying to avoid an overly scummy hop on. TTJT - what are your thoughts on this?

In post 369, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 367, UNOwen wrote:

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

Not a fan of this post.

Agreed.

Can you both elaborate why? What stood out to you about that post?

In post 256, GuiltyLion wrote:also DoctorPepper in addendum to this, I'd like an update on your read on 72offsuit. You were scumreading him earlier, I gave some reasons as to why I think he might be scum, I find it strange that now you pivot to Walter and toss some suspicion at me instead of potentially working with me on 72offsuit.

Interesting point! I’d like to hear what he has to say as well. What are your thoughts on it 72?

In post 371, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 369, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 367, UNOwen wrote:

In post 352, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyone care to explain TTJT as scum? I'm kinda town reading their posts because the UNOwen analysis makes sense to me

Not a fan of this post.

Agreed.

Can you both elaborate why? What stood out to you about that post?

Doctor Pepper is inviting people to convince him to scumread JT, even though the reasons for that suspicion have been well discussed and he can surely make up his own mind. He "kinda" townreads JT, which is a noncommittal read if I've ever seen one. So weak resistance to JT wagon, but one that leaves plenty of room to back down. Then he says the analysis against me "makes sense". It's not clear what he means and it's not paired with a vote, so again vague and noncommittal but this time in support of the wagon against me.

It also bothers me what's not in the post: despite suggesting support for the case against me, his vote is still sitting on Walter. There is no effort to push forward the Walter vote, or pressure Walter or really advance anything.

And finally, Doctor Pepper is the most experienced player in the game (at least by join date, I don't know how much he has played compared to the other SEs). The only player who has seemed less engaged was pi, who had a grand total of 4 posts.