Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 9:43 pm
i'm treating mech effort as NAI
really dislike this post. "I don't think you should be townread" in particular is a phrase that feels distinctly scummy to me, there's like an undertone of bitterness to it, like DrDolittle is annoyed that people have correctly identified Hoopla as town for reasons that DrD finds erroneous.In post 289, DrDolittle wrote:even if you are town, how do you know scum players haven't thought about your line, and have players like you in the lobby to provide them with free defense?
independently, I don't buy this line of thinking, and I don't think you should be townread for suggesting it.
you realize that scum have an alternate way of getting rid of townread players, right? Instead of just spewing their dislike about it in game?In post 353, iamausername wrote:really dislike this post. "I don't think you should be townread" in particular is a phrase that feels distinctly scummy to me, there's like an undertone of bitterness to it, like DrDolittle is annoyed that people have correctly identified Hoopla as town for reasons that DrD finds erroneous.In post 289, DrDolittle wrote:even if you are town, how do you know scum players haven't thought about your line, and have players like you in the lobby to provide them with free defense?
independently, I don't buy this line of thinking, and I don't think you should be townread for suggesting it.
it's like a funhouse mirror version of 'you caught me for the wrong reasons'.
& i feel like S_S has acquitted himself adequately. the post that originally bothered me makes more sense knowing he was describing 67 as a 'plan' and not talking about Hoopla's initial entry. his eagerness to jump into theory discussions where, as scum, he doesn't have to lie about his true feelings is still a little concerning, but he's hardly alone on that front in this game.
VOTE: DrDolittle
no i didn't realise. tell me more.In post 354, Iconeum wrote: you realize that scum have an alternate way of getting rid of townread players, right? Instead of just spewing their dislike about it in game?
I would seriously consider it, but only because hoopla is in the game.In post 303, the worst wrote:fwiw i'd also fairly-strongly encourage my team to pairIn post 301, Hoopla wrote:it's clear that the only realistic way it could have happened is if i'm scum.
I am a cat, guilty as chargedIn post 324, the worst wrote:it's literally almost completely irrelevant what hoopla is doing with theory rn as long as we are not sheeps.
are you sheeps? or are you... animal-speaking doctors and hats?
+1In post 333, Something_Smart wrote:Actually not quite. It's not the effort that makes it towny; it's the fact that she's making a big show of pushing an unpopular opinion.In post 328, the worst wrote:aorn i think this is remarkably objectively correct.
I didn't like that post either, but more so because I disagree with the first sentence. The doc is drinking too much paranoia wine.In post 353, iamausername wrote:really dislike this post. "I don't think you should be townread" in particular is a phrase that feels distinctly scummy to me, there's like an undertone of bitterness to it, like DrDolittle is annoyed that people have correctly identified Hoopla as town for reasons that DrD finds erroneous.In post 289, DrDolittle wrote:even if you are town, how do you know scum players haven't thought about your line, and have players like you in the lobby to provide them with free defense?
independently, I don't buy this line of thinking, and I don't think you should be townread for suggesting it.
it's like a funhouse mirror version of 'you caught me for the wrong reasons'.
& i feel like S_S has acquitted himself adequately. the post that originally bothered me makes more sense knowing he was describing 67 as a 'plan' and not talking about Hoopla's initial entry. his eagerness to jump into theory discussions where, as scum, he doesn't have to lie about his true feelings is still a little concerning, but he's hardly alone on that front in this game.
VOTE: DrDolittle
^ clearly this cat knows how susceptible i am to shameless flattery.In post 359, Grumpy Cat wrote:I would seriously consider it, but only because hoopla is in the game.
(Huge fan btw)
nah, there's definitely a tone difference between "i think you guys are wrong about town!Hoopla" and "i know you guys are right about town!Hoopla but i don't think your reasons are valid".In post 358, Iconeum wrote:what I don't understand is that you come to a scum!DDL conclusion based on said 'bitter underlying tone', which I think comes from town as well, for exactly those reasons
this isn't me. the only alt i have last posted in 2011, so the answer to Ico's question is almost certainly no.
in the one pyp i played before (so small sample size etc) cop checked the 1st in draft on n1 so i dunno?In post 226, Hoopla wrote:winning top of the draft actually kinda sucks as town since you're a magnet for interference. whereas scum in top slots can wreak havoc becausetown's tend to leave them unchecked out of fear.
i heavily *heavily* dislike thisIn post 304, word321 wrote:Either way, from scum or town, I think effort wise Hoopla is definitely inclined to town, and my hoghest tl; the point was that scum can cast the same argument without the enormous effort (and possibly fun) of revolecting and analysing data, wich is more likely of someone who wants to genuinely look for tips on where scum is
I'm obviously not sure either. But I'm really struggling to see what scum-Hoopla hopes to gain from this. I don't really think that the smartest way to profit from doubling up as scum is to double up and then drop the stats immediately and announce that scum definitely didn't double-- in particular I thought the part where she announced that a double could only have occurred if she was scum was fairly towny. If she's scum, it doesn't help her if she doubled, and it doesn't help her if she didn't double, and it very well could get her pressured for trying to execute PR's.In post 335, the worst wrote:but this is a fairly neat observation. i'm not really sure hoops does anything different as scum though really? i don't know her super well. i can understand why this is a positive observation fypov
Frankly, I'm offended :XIn post 348, DrDolittle wrote:I think mech effort is more scum indicative than town indicative.
I don't follow it. She hasn't posted the number distribution for town, so there's no justification for a push based on number picked.In post 369, Datisi wrote:@s_s i saw you say you think hoopla's town for pushing unpopular opinion, can i get your take on my tinfoil here