Mafiascum.net

my pagetop

nailed it first time....

In post 347, Morning Mage wrote:It's certainly better than the "Giggling" one. That one gives me nightmares.

In post 148, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 146, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Guys, anyone that uses THAT "thing" as an emoji regurarly cannot be human. Nor a good member from town.

"guys" to appeal to majority? whoops, a scumslip this early mon ami?

Is it time for the first inter-hydra toxic 1v1?

Blossom and I were planning to have one tomorrow, so can you wait for us so we can have them parallel

~Buttercup

In post 345, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 343, Morning Mage wrote:I can't believe the triple-headed hydra is not most prolific poster in this game. needs to up the stakes!

It takes a lot more than a couple of cheap shots to make us cry.

I can guarantee we'll be top poster by the end of this day

~Buttercup

you should have 50% more posts than any other player to maintain any shred of credibility.

In post 330, Morning Mage wrote:hey Morning-side, who is scum? who we voting? what should i check out?

Vecna, Nero, Echo, maybe Plus all look good to me so far. Who is scum.... i'll have to get back to you on that.

In post 345, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 343, Morning Mage wrote:I can't believe the triple-headed hydra is not most prolific poster in this game. needs to up the stakes!

It takes a lot more than a couple of cheap shots to make us cry.

I can guarantee we'll be top poster by the end of this day

~Buttercup

Oh god oh fuck don't make this a competition guys. This is like a speedrun to see how fast we can convince the thread to policy the hydras

Oh, I guess you three aren't huge fans of hydras. i see what ur doing. i wont fall for it

~Morning

In post 347, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 328, Nero Cain wrote:but Vecna knows that I play the game so Vecna calling my post try hard doesn't seem to make sense from a town Vecna mindset. I'm not saying that I made 27 with the intention of halting RJVS but me throwing out actual game content and Vecna going "GAME CONTENT BAD!" does seems to serve the purpose of wanting us to stay in a fluff contenless game, no?

I like your idea here-- yeah, you were giving out game content and I can follow that Vecna might be trying to punish that. I don't think Vecna is scum for it yet but I do think you're arguing this from a good place

In post 327, PlusJOYED wrote:if taylor is a gimmick alt they've been using it a lot.
I'm gently leaning towards a town!nero atm. If he was scum I think he'd have ducked and hid from the early SR's on him. He's also going against the grain/gamestate a bit imo with the anti-hectic feels.

She's not an alt. i'm like 90% sure

definitely a gimmick though. I've figured out the pattern and she's really easy to read now for me.

Oh, just you wait until Flopz "the guy who waits at the bus stopz" gets here. He's probably the most prolific hyperposter this site has ever seen. I fear for everyone here

~Buttercup

In post 353, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 345, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 343, Morning Mage wrote:I can't believe the triple-headed hydra is not most prolific poster in this game. needs to up the stakes!

It takes a lot more than a couple of cheap shots to make us cry.

I can guarantee we'll be top poster by the end of this day

~Buttercup

you should have 50% more posts than any other player to maintain any shred of credibility.

I probably won't need this.

In post 355, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 347, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 328, Nero Cain wrote:but Vecna knows that I play the game so Vecna calling my post try hard doesn't seem to make sense from a town Vecna mindset. I'm not saying that I made 27 with the intention of halting RJVS but me throwing out actual game content and Vecna going "GAME CONTENT BAD!" does seems to serve the purpose of wanting us to stay in a fluff contenless game, no?

I like your idea here-- yeah, you were giving out game content and I can follow that Vecna might be trying to punish that. I don't think Vecna is scum for it yet but I do think you're arguing this from a good place

In post 327, PlusJOYED wrote:if taylor is a gimmick alt they've been using it a lot.
I'm gently leaning towards a town!nero atm. If he was scum I think he'd have ducked and hid from the early SR's on him. He's also going against the grain/gamestate a bit imo with the anti-hectic feels.

She's not an alt. i'm like 90% sure

definitely a gimmick though. I've figured out the pattern and she's really easy to read now for me.

Please refrain from using the giggling emoji

~Buttercup

In post 354, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 330, Morning Mage wrote:hey Morning-side, who is scum? who we voting? what should i check out?

Vecna, Nero, Echo, maybe Plus all look good to me so far. Who is scum.... i'll have to get back to you on that.

In post 345, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 343, Morning Mage wrote:I can't believe the triple-headed hydra is not most prolific poster in this game. needs to up the stakes!

It takes a lot more than a couple of cheap shots to make us cry.

I can guarantee we'll be top poster by the end of this day

~Buttercup

Oh god oh fuck don't make this a competition guys. This is like a speedrun to see how fast we can convince the thread to policy the hydras

Oh, I guess you three aren't huge fans of hydras. i see what ur doing. i wont fall for it

~Morning

I'm afraid to say, I might fall for it!

As for reads, I'm fine with townblocking those for now I think. I reckon Nero maybe scum though?

I was considering advancing the gamestate but realized I had homework can I just get my townpoints anyways

Nero not getting jokes and pushing them definitely isn't town-indicative, or do you have other reasoning for calling him town, Morning?

~Buttercup

In post 358, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 355, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 347, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 328, Nero Cain wrote:but Vecna knows that I play the game so Vecna calling my post try hard doesn't seem to make sense from a town Vecna mindset. I'm not saying that I made 27 with the intention of halting RJVS but me throwing out actual game content and Vecna going "GAME CONTENT BAD!" does seems to serve the purpose of wanting us to stay in a fluff contenless game, no?

I like your idea here-- yeah, you were giving out game content and I can follow that Vecna might be trying to punish that. I don't think Vecna is scum for it yet but I do think you're arguing this from a good place

In post 327, PlusJOYED wrote:if taylor is a gimmick alt they've been using it a lot.
I'm gently leaning towards a town!nero atm. If he was scum I think he'd have ducked and hid from the early SR's on him. He's also going against the grain/gamestate a bit imo with the anti-hectic feels.

She's not an alt. i'm like 90% sure

definitely a gimmick though. I've figured out the pattern and she's really easy to read now for me.

Please refrain from using the giggling emoji

~Buttercup

oi, i was putting you over earlier as being generally nice!

In post 360, superbowl9 wrote:I was considering advancing the gamestate but realized I had homework can I just get my townpoints anyways

Townbinning this

~Buttercup

In post 360, superbowl9 wrote:I was considering advancing the gamestate but realized I had homework can I just get my townpoints anyways

I can respect this. Townpoints granted.

taylor isn't a gimmick alt.
I do think nero is just making themselves LHF, probably not on purpose. The "stop with the fluff and you guys arent funny D:<" isn't something that seems like it'd come from scum. When you make people upset at you they're probably more likely to vote you.

@Hectic, you said you've played with nero. Do you think my thinking on nero has any merit or does nero play like that as either alignment?

In post 363, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 360, superbowl9 wrote:I was considering advancing the gamestate but realized I had homework can I just get my townpoints anyways

Townbinning this

~Buttercup

ah great minds. Yo Morning-head - add superbowl to the townbloc!

In post 365, PlusJOYED wrote:taylor isn't a gimmick alt.
I do think nero is just making themselves LHF, probably not on purpose. The "stop with the fluff and you guys arent funny D:<" isn't something that seems like it'd come from scum. When you make people upset at you they're probably more likely to vote you.

@Hectic, you said you've played with nero. Do you think my thinking on nero has any merit or does nero play like that as either alignment?

I'm not sure you're right on Taylor.

On the more important question of Nero - I'm wondering whether he normally plays so serious at the start? His vibe just felt a little outta step ya know? nothing tangible though

@Plus: What did you mean he was going against the grain on me? No one had said they liked me alignment-wise. Based on the very brief meta I've done on Nero in past games, he's a little less combative and mad in general as scum. I know town!him hates fluff and jokes so it might be TI, I can see that. I haven't liked any of his reasoning so far though, like the questioning on Tayl0r

~Buttercup

In post 367, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 365, PlusJOYED wrote:taylor isn't a gimmick alt.
I do think nero is just making themselves LHF, probably not on purpose. The "stop with the fluff and you guys arent funny D:<" isn't something that seems like it'd come from scum. When you make people upset at you they're probably more likely to vote you.

@Hectic, you said you've played with nero. Do you think my thinking on nero has any merit or does nero play like that as either alignment?

I'm not sure you're right on Taylor.

On the more important question of Nero - I'm wondering whether he normally plays so serious at the start? His vibe just felt a little outta step ya know? nothing tangible though

I am sure PlusJOYED is right on Tayl0r

~Buttercup

In post 369, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 367, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 365, PlusJOYED wrote:taylor isn't a gimmick alt.
I do think nero is just making themselves LHF, probably not on purpose. The "stop with the fluff and you guys arent funny D:<" isn't something that seems like it'd come from scum. When you make people upset at you they're probably more likely to vote you.

@Hectic, you said you've played with nero. Do you think my thinking on nero has any merit or does nero play like that as either alignment?

I'm not sure you're right on Taylor.

On the more important question of Nero - I'm wondering whether he normally plays so serious at the start? His vibe just felt a little outta step ya know? nothing tangible though

I am sure PlusJOYED is right on Tayl0r

~Buttercup

Do you think Taylor's posts in this game come from a pro-town mindset? Please show your workings.

In post 362, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 358, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 355, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 347, Morning Mage wrote:oi, i was putting you over earlier as being generally nice!

I am nice
Would someone who wasn't nice use this friendly emoji?

~Buttercup

In post 370, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 369, Ban Hydras wrote:

In post 367, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 365, PlusJOYED wrote:taylor isn't a gimmick alt.
I do think nero is just making themselves LHF, probably not on purpose. The "stop with the fluff and you guys arent funny D:<" isn't something that seems like it'd come from scum. When you make people upset at you they're probably more likely to vote you.

@Hectic, you said you've played with nero. Do you think my thinking on nero has any merit or does nero play like that as either alignment?

I'm not sure you're right on Taylor.

On the more important question of Nero - I'm wondering whether he normally plays so serious at the start? His vibe just felt a little outta step ya know? nothing tangible though

I am sure PlusJOYED is right on Tayl0r

~Buttercup

Do you think Taylor's posts in this game come from a pro-town mindset? Please show your workings.

She's solely joked around so far, which is NAI

~Buttercup

Morning Mage, will you not be using an avatar for this game?!"? T£gwqy gtbf

~Buttercup

In post 357, Bell wrote:I probably won't need this.

Hi Bell, nice to see you again

~Buttercup