Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:01 am
We now have two people who have said they would be willing to flip a green slot. Maybe T3 is right and Newbies do actually burn the soul.
He posted.
Wut? Scum post too... Like wth, man. What's with all this super weak reasoning?
Fair enough. But I'd actually like you to case Roden if you could.In post 352, StrangeMatter wrote:Right now its 10% reason for pushing for a reveal for the actual meta, 20% because both T3 and Roden TR and I want to flip one of them to analyze the other, and 70% because Roden has to me felt like he is defensive and cares about how town perceives him.
In post 337, StrangeMatter wrote:I say Roden or you right now is my top two candidates for scum has to be you and the former is honestly better to flip than your slot. Roden elim. To me, getting some information involving the meta (of T3 and Roden) is probably more useful than eliminating you because of what some people here consider a slip.In post 333, Clasko wrote:Also wanna ask SM who their two strongest elimination candidates are rn for D1, and why?
I say two, because one is most likely me which you've hinted the potential reasons for in #279 and iterating that doesn't say much.
Imagine threatening to vote a townie out because they refuse to out town power roles. This is such an overtly scummy thought process you might as well be scum claiming.In post 339, StrangeMatter wrote:Even if this flips green it means we still have some sort of information, so either way I think this vote is fine.
Yes butIn post 353, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wut? Scum post too... Like wth, man. What's with all this super weak reasoning?
Are you every going to explain anything this game?In post 356, T3 wrote:Yes butIn post 353, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wut? Scum post too... Like wth, man. What's with all this super weak reasoning?
good vibes posts
Theres a thing called pushing people, smh T3.
Its t3, he never explains anythingIn post 357, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you every going to explain anything this game?In post 356, T3 wrote:Yes butIn post 353, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wut? Scum post too... Like wth, man. What's with all this super weak reasoning?
good vibes posts
Yes... That is also something that was on my mind while I was pondering LQ considering the game's pace. Still, some of LQ's progression is suspicious, like the stuff you pointed out about Clasko. I am wondering how possible it is that the reason the wagon happened so quickly wasn't opportunistic scum bandwagoning but rather that we found it and then just got nervous at the speed and backed off collectively. But I really appreciate LQ's argument against, you know, eliminating slots that are likely green. And on that note I will VOTE: Strange (that's e-2)In post 329, Egix96 wrote:I won't be able to sit down and form a comprehensive, updated read until I am back from visiting my grandparents today, but for the time being I will say that I don't think it's a good idea to yeet the top poster on D1 unless there is a very compelling case for them being scum, because if they flip town it's a huge blow.In post 324, alstroemerial wrote:For now, I'm going to VOTE: Egix to try to squeeze some more content out. Question for you: Has your read on LQ changed since 111 given that they've been particularly active, and since the whole slip discussion?
Sup I know it's PoE but is there anything can I do here to save myself from the day pool lol
This feels pretty close to a naked vote considering you just mentioned the term, and that you hopped off Clasko right after asking T3 "what about Clasko?" Can you say more about this vote?
Ok so you're voting me and then saying that's a naked vote?In post 359, alstroemerial wrote: Yes... That is also something that was on my mind while I was pondering LQ considering the game's pace. Still, some of LQ's progression is suspicious, like the stuff you pointed out about Clasko. I am wondering how possible it is that the reason the wagon happened so quickly wasn't opportunistic scum bandwagoning but rather that we found it and then just got nervous at the speed and backed off collectively. But I really appreciate LQ's argument against, you know, eliminating slots that are likely green. And on that note I will VOTE: Strange (that's e-2)
Sup I know it's PoE but is there anything can I do here to save myself from the day pool lol
This feels pretty close to a naked vote considering you just mentioned the term, and that you hopped off Clasko right after asking T3 "what about Clasko?" Can you say more about this vote?
Yes, I realize that. My reasoning is elsewhere. Notably 328, 342, and 345 all of which I consider very strange from uh... Strange.In post 359, alstroemerial wrote:This feels pretty close to a naked vote considering you just mentioned the term, and that you hopped off Clasko right after asking T3 "what about Clasko?" Can you say more about this vote?
I don't like surface to surface contect, especially pushing.In post 358, HockeyFan wrote:Theres a thing called pushing people, smh T3.
Its t3, he never explains anythingIn post 357, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you every going to explain anything this game?In post 356, T3 wrote:Yes butIn post 353, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wut? Scum post too... Like wth, man. What's with all this super weak reasoning?
good vibes posts
Also; this whole Roden/Strange interaction is so odd that I WANT to say its w/w but its probably t/w
I would disagree with that.In post 358, HockeyFan wrote:Its t3, he never explains anything
Then why do you play those games?In post 365, T3 wrote:Any games not in new york/coney island I just never have enough motivation.
They look interesting but I get bored really fast because no one's doing anything AI.In post 367, LicketyQuickety wrote:Then why do you play those games?In post 365, T3 wrote:Any games not in new york/coney island I just never have enough motivation.
I think I worded that badly. Roden knew where I got the idea for the massclaim from.In post 369, LicketyQuickety wrote:On another note, this sort of weird posting type of thing is more what I expect of T3. IDK if I'm moving them to TL yet or not, but I will see if it continues. And after saying it out in the open, it probably diminishes the effect. Sorta just want T3 to actually talk about his reasons at this point. T3 is getting dry minus the last few posts and it's not what I expect of his Town game.
P-Edit: And what exactly were you trying to do T3?
Which was from where?In post 371, T3 wrote:I think I worded that badly. Roden knew where I got the idea for the massclaim from.In post 369, LicketyQuickety wrote:On another note, this sort of weird posting type of thing is more what I expect of T3. IDK if I'm moving them to TL yet or not, but I will see if it continues. And after saying it out in the open, it probably diminishes the effect. Sorta just want T3 to actually talk about his reasons at this point. T3 is getting dry minus the last few posts and it's not what I expect of his Town game.
P-Edit: And what exactly were you trying to do T3?
Not allowed to say.In post 372, LicketyQuickety wrote:Which was from where?In post 371, T3 wrote:I think I worded that badly. Roden knew where I got the idea for the massclaim from.In post 369, LicketyQuickety wrote:On another note, this sort of weird posting type of thing is more what I expect of T3. IDK if I'm moving them to TL yet or not, but I will see if it continues. And after saying it out in the open, it probably diminishes the effect. Sorta just want T3 to actually talk about his reasons at this point. T3 is getting dry minus the last few posts and it's not what I expect of his Town game.
P-Edit: And what exactly were you trying to do T3?