In post 326, SirCakez wrote:also this is ridiculous - literally one person claimed
Is that the one you found the most concerning about that post?
I'd say it was roughly even across the three posts i mentioned
I need to check but I think they also implied that they were deathproof or something. Either way, assuming both LLD and Norwee are town, mafia can PoE useful PRs town has, similarly why claiming VT unnecessarily can be damaging.
In post 127, Yukari Yakumo wrote:I just realized that if I am to properly roleplay I need to actually lurk until twilight which is not possible due to the fact that I will be replaced. Slightly less lazy Yukari it is.
You can roleplay having a teaparty with me. I'm immortal and votelesss. Teaparty is my whole thing.
Although LLD might have been referring to their character with the 'immortal' line lol.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:27 am
by Titus
In post 350, SirCakez wrote:If Reg doesn't want to share off-site games for personal reasons I don't see an issue with that
I do, partially. I'd be lying if I didn't. It will nag me because my gut says he won't share because the tone will match and he'd be metaed. However, I will try not to factor that as attacking someone for protecting personal information is shitty. My gut says no because it's not plausible. I'm not going to deny that though.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:37 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 353, Titus wrote:However, I will try not to factor that as attacking someone for protecting personal information is shitty.
In post 333, Yukari Yakumo wrote:Titus can you locate a problem in Reg’s 283? I personally think it’s a pretty big one.
Two. One pointed out by SirCakez. The other is the suggestion "We have a hydra". There's an explaination for it but it's not good.
What about the part where he said he will ISO Norwee exclusively despite having him as the only townread in this game?
It's not like there weren't any good alternatives to ISO.
Can you quote the posts?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:45 am
by Titus
In post 357, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I do find it strange that he wanted to iso me but apparently forgot why...?
Oh, that was directed at me? Right now, not much. We have a Hydra, so maybe I'll wait until the other person gets on. I think Town already outted too many roles. I don't have the motivation atm but I'll ISO Norwee and see what I think then.
Oh, that was directed at me? Right now, not much. We have a Hydra, so maybe I'll wait until the other person gets on. I think Town already outted too many roles. I don't have the motivation atm but I'll ISO Norwee and see what I think then.
I'm looking for where he says NorwegianboyEE is town.
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
The only game I played on this site is ongoing. I assumed you could just look in my post history. Not sure what you are asking.
Offsite is fine
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
Offsite completed games are fine to link to. Why won't you?
Why would asking for finished games get you modkilled?
Because I assumed you want me to slip and get me modkilled for that rule. I am sorry, but getting offsite games is an unreasonable request. Its not because of a MS rule, its an internet safety thing.
I'm not asking for your real name or anything similar. No way you slip and get modkilled for sharing an offsite game.
Apparently you need bold to understand.
I will not share information from site to site if I can help it.
I don’t really get this distaste, and I feel like not granting oneself offsite meta is a waste.
In post 296, Sanae wrote:We should stop RPing so the fun police can't complain and actually have to scum hunt :3
Do you think scum is hiding among the fun police?
It's an easy thing to complain about if you are having trouble fitting in to the flow of the conversation.
I would guess one of the people making serious faces is actually an enemy.
Who do you think it is then? Why would scum be hiding in the serious faces because surely scum would be thinking along the lines of the more confusion, the better it would be too blend in?
Or do you think that scum or least one of, will be trying to take the mantle this early to lead the game?
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
The only game I played on this site is ongoing. I assumed you could just look in my post history. Not sure what you are asking.
Offsite is fine
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
Offsite completed games are fine to link to. Why won't you?
Why would asking for finished games get you modkilled?
Because I assumed you want me to slip and get me modkilled for that rule. I am sorry, but getting offsite games is an unreasonable request. Its not because of a MS rule, its an internet safety thing.
I'm not sure I'm following this safety matter. I mean if it's a public forum, it's entirely that, public. I know the chances of actually coming across the site that your on is very very slim with the amount of public domains that are out there, but I'm failing to see why it's 1) a safety thing, 2) denying someone just wanting to check out your meta when you have little over here.
It doesn't bother me about you not wanting to share this, but I just find that it's suspicious that your wanting to conceal something that isn't really a big deal in my eyes.
I used to play mafia on another website a long time ago, I never shared this information because it was never asked, or never mentioned, but if anyone asked at the time I was playing across here to wanting to see it, I wouldn't have had any issue sending them across.