Mafiascum.net

Marci, can u elaborate on that vote/your thoughts in the game state in general

In post 132, T3 wrote:

In post 75, Titus wrote:

In post 72, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 64, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 59, Titus wrote:

In post 47, GrandpaMo wrote:this interaction is weird ngl

Hi. I'm weird.

we know

lol watch this be a breadcrumb

breadcrumb of what

Lol Grandpa's never played with me as a PR so I guess that makes sense. He's legit never seen me invested in a game.

As I type this out...it makes me wonder why Grandpa would see a personality comment as a bread crumb thpugh.

This post feels really, really off.

What makes it feel off?

In post 191, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 188, Galron wrote:

In post 185, HockeyFan wrote:My tr on him comes from tonal/vibes atm

How is it different from the game we just finished?

Ok iirc the game was just came off of, I was tring him for his content, but this game its more for his vibes/tonal. Also there is almost no point in metaing t3 since he plays too crazily/weirdly regardless of alligment

Was his vibes/tonal different in that game, to this one?

In post 234, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 229, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 226, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 222, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 199, Roden wrote:I'll have Grandpa's alignment nailed in like two days.

lol i think i have a towntell for u and its kinda eh rn.

im just waiting give me like a day

Whats the point of saying stuff like this lol

whats the point of roden saying that? same answer.

what makes you SO offended about this post that you have to reply and make a whole quote about it and talk about it. i know roden and i have played roden. i havent formally interacted with roden other than this.

Because I know in like 1-2 days you're just gonna sheep the consenous read on Roden, you're setting it up, ik that. these blanket reads dont really hold of much value to me. Roden doing this is also bad, never said it was good. Im aware i didnt call him out on it earlier, but I am now B)(+i think rodens a slight TL rn)

I kinda agree with this tbh.

In post 253, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 248, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 220, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 173, Roden wrote:

In post 169, HockeyFan wrote:T3 is probably town this game btw

Agreed. I'm feeling good about you, T3, Titus, and StD. And I guess Galron by association if the earlier meta read is correct.

despite me liking u, i have to say i hard disagree on this town circle -- and its a bad one here.

i feel like hockey and titus are never alligned here :/

okay; why is hockey town then?

answer my question first before you go on to ask 5 other questions.

i already said why hockey was town. they are playing close to their town meta. they are acting again tstbs, where they engage in a conversation with me point out a weird narrative and fight it till death. hockey however could have improved their scumplay and i wouldnt be suprised if they did this to trick me in thinking they are town because they know if i argue with them i will eventually call them tstbs which would be an amazing play on hockeys part.

They may be playing close to there town meta, but it's not just you that they have to convince they are town. I may understand the point that they may be trying to get you on board, but even you aren't strong enough to convince everybody that they are town, just because 'you' know there town meta, where others might not.

I kinda feel this whole back and forth from Gamma and Grandpa is strange and feels like it could be theatre, but I just don't think it would come day one, so I don't know. It just feels weird.

And I don't like the what looks like to be buddying from T3 and Titus in the early stages.

I looked at some of sb9's meta and found some stuff.

Lies

In post 348, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 346, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 345, superbowl9 wrote:Also why the hockey vote gamma?

I mentioned earlier I felt like hockeyfan had been asking questions and not doing much with them
for instance the asking of why I cared about GMo seeing a crumb, I don't think hockeyfan has actually done anything with my response to that

I mean even if it looks im not doing much with the questions

directly

, I am indirectly making reads off of them, no? I have a solid town core :^)

Also, your answer to my question was "I dont see how it was a crumb", which imo didnt really need to prompt a response.

That’s only half of my response
The other half was that I was trying to check what GMo was playing at

Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

Thanks for the guide on how to fool town for the rest of the game!

In post 356, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

Thanks for the guide on how to fool town for the rest of the game!

lol its funny because t3 just pasted his meta and replaced his name with ur name

In post 351, Kop wrote:I kinda agree with this tbh.

how do u agree on a meta read when u havent even played wit me

Who's scum grandpa?

In post 359, superbowl9 wrote:Who's scum grandpa?

im writing my analysis rn which has my scum . also its t3 proof so it means t3 can read it

In post 358, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 351, Kop wrote:I kinda agree with this tbh.

how do u agree on a meta read when u havent even played wit me

I was agreeing with the point, that you could easily shape yourself to be on either side the consensus comes too. I mean you said that you could be able to form a read in 1-2 days, but if Roden becomes widely scum read, you could easily agree with that consensus and say yeah he's scum, I've got my read.

The same also could be said about Roden when he said the same thing about you.

cool

In post 351, Kop wrote:

In post 132, T3 wrote:

In post 75, Titus wrote:

In post 72, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 64, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 59, Titus wrote:

In post 47, GrandpaMo wrote:this interaction is weird ngl

Hi. I'm weird.

we know

lol watch this be a breadcrumb

breadcrumb of what

Lol Grandpa's never played with me as a PR so I guess that makes sense. He's legit never seen me invested in a game.

As I type this out...it makes me wonder why Grandpa would see a personality comment as a bread crumb thpugh.

This post feels really, really off.

What makes it feel off?

In post 191, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 188, Galron wrote:

In post 185, HockeyFan wrote:My tr on him comes from tonal/vibes atm

How is it different from the game we just finished?

Ok iirc the game was just came off of, I was tring him for his content, but this game its more for his vibes/tonal. Also there is almost no point in metaing t3 since he plays too crazily/weirdly regardless of alligment

Was his vibes/tonal different in that game, to this one?

In post 234, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 229, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 226, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 222, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 199, Roden wrote:I'll have Grandpa's alignment nailed in like two days.

lol i think i have a towntell for u and its kinda eh rn.

im just waiting give me like a day

Whats the point of saying stuff like this lol

whats the point of roden saying that? same answer.

what makes you SO offended about this post that you have to reply and make a whole quote about it and talk about it. i know roden and i have played roden. i havent formally interacted with roden other than this.

Because I know in like 1-2 days you're just gonna sheep the consenous read on Roden, you're setting it up, ik that. these blanket reads dont really hold of much value to me. Roden doing this is also bad, never said it was good. Im aware i didnt call him out on it earlier, but I am now B)(+i think rodens a slight TL rn)

I kinda agree with this tbh.

In post 253, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 248, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 220, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 173, Roden wrote:

In post 169, HockeyFan wrote:T3 is probably town this game btw

Agreed. I'm feeling good about you, T3, Titus, and StD. And I guess Galron by association if the earlier meta read is correct.

despite me liking u, i have to say i hard disagree on this town circle -- and its a bad one here.

i feel like hockey and titus are never alligned here :/

okay; why is hockey town then?

answer my question first before you go on to ask 5 other questions.

i already said why hockey was town. they are playing close to their town meta. they are acting again tstbs, where they engage in a conversation with me point out a weird narrative and fight it till death. hockey however could have improved their scumplay and i wouldnt be suprised if they did this to trick me in thinking they are town because they know if i argue with them i will eventually call them tstbs which would be an amazing play on hockeys part.

They may be playing close to there town meta, but it's not just you that they have to convince they are town. I may understand the point that they may be trying to get you on board, but even you aren't strong enough to convince everybody that they are town, just because 'you' know there town meta, where others might not.

I kinda feel this whole back and forth from Gamma and Grandpa is strange and feels like it could be theatre, but I just don't think it would come day one, so I don't know. It just feels weird.

And I don't like the what looks like to be buddying from T3 and Titus in the early stages.

Specifically the part that was strange was the "Lol"

In post 37, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 29, Gamma Emerald wrote:lul
PEdit: interesting, I feel like in past games you’ve used a “guilty until proven innocent” approach with me, am I wrong? If I’m right, why the flip in tactics?

You're right, I guess that's just how I look at everyone by default?
And cause I feel like it

In post 42, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 41, marcistar wrote:

In post 39, T3 wrote:marcistar anagrams to "Arm rats IC"
Naturally you are a rats arm who also rolled IC.

shh thats a secret for now yknow?

Hey I'm a hidden IC too!

In post 148, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?

How? I've played with titus a bunch and she doesn't really seem abnormal to me thus far

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

In post 344, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 206, Galron wrote:

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

What is it that you see?

Just seems like their sorting has been artificial to me

In post 227, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.

lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true

eh its usually means it. im not arguing with you anymore regarding this -- i swear this SHIT HAPPENED IM GETTING DEJA VU LOL

WE WERE LITERALLYT BOTH TVT TUNNELING EACH OTHER FOR PETTY SHIT LOL

why would you jump to TvT here? seems very odd

In post 258, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 257, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.

lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true

I don’t think I’d need to ask if there was an actual breadcrumb
I moreso asked because I didn’t see it and scum are generally the ones who’d look out for them so I wanted to put GMo on the spot

if you didn't see it. and people have claimed they haven't either. and i said its a breadcrumb, then wouldn't that make me town? since what titus said not a breadcrumb from ur pov?

for someone who said they were moving on from this you sure haven't

In post 288, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselves

Are you

Not_Mafia

?

I'm a hectic alt

In post 299, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 83, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 80, Titus wrote:Townbinning Gamma.

SCUM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FOCUS ON ME DOING THIS TO EARLY TOWNBIN A BUDDY HMMMMMMMM?~?!!?

Is this post serious?

Don't try me.....

In post 327, T3 wrote:I did some metadiving of sb9 last night but forgot to post it.

Don't bother no amount of work will get your scumbutt off the hook

These are all town Superb Owl 9 posts.

^at least we agree on one thing

In post 361, Kop wrote:

In post 358, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 351, Kop wrote:I kinda agree with this tbh.

how do u agree on a meta read when u havent even played wit me

I was agreeing with the point, that you could easily shape yourself to be on either side the consensus comes too. I mean you said that you could be able to form a read in 1-2 days, but if Roden becomes widely scum read, you could easily agree with that consensus and say yeah he's scum, I've got my read.

The same also could be said about Roden when he said the same thing about you.

ah thats makes more sense. i just thought hockey saying that was referring to my meta about roden someway? i was confused because roden usually gets townread not scumread by me and by others, but then i realized that could happen regardless of meta.

In post 351, Kop wrote:

In post 191, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 188, Galron wrote:

In post 185, HockeyFan wrote:My tr on him comes from tonal/vibes atm

How is it different from the game we just finished?

Ok iirc the game was just came off of, I was tring him for his content, but this game its more for his vibes/tonal. Also there is almost no point in metaing t3 since he plays too crazily/weirdly regardless of alligment

Was his vibes/tonal different in that game, to this one?

Can't really tell, but at a quick glance, yes.

In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 348, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 346, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 345, superbowl9 wrote:Also why the hockey vote gamma?

I mentioned earlier I felt like hockeyfan had been asking questions and not doing much with them
for instance the asking of why I cared about GMo seeing a crumb, I don't think hockeyfan has actually done anything with my response to that

I mean even if it looks im not doing much with the questions

directly

, I am indirectly making reads off of them, no? I have a solid town core :^)

Also, your answer to my question was "I dont see how it was a crumb", which imo didnt really need to prompt a response.

That’s only half of my response
The other half was that I was trying to check what GMo was playing at

Yea, and I still dont see why you should care about what GMo is playing at. If hes town, hes likely trying to bait scum that he thinks its a breadcrumb when he doesnt think it actually is one. Even if he does think its a breadcrumb as town, he is probably trying to WIFOM/ has no point to say that. Simillary, If hes scum and HE does think its a real breadcrumb, why bring attention to that in thread? just put it in scum PT

In post 1, GuyInFreezer wrote:Daychat is not enabled by default.

^towntell for not knowing that tho

Those posts by sb9 are all town indicative as they are either slight joking or consistently engaging with the thread.

In post 79, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 75, Titus wrote:

In post 72, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 64, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 59, Titus wrote:

In post 47, GrandpaMo wrote:this interaction is weird ngl

Hi. I'm weird.

we know

lol watch this be a breadcrumb

breadcrumb of what

Lol Grandpa's never played with me as a PR so I guess that makes sense. He's legit never seen me invested in a game.

As I type this out...it makes me wonder why Grandpa would see a personality comment as a bread crumb thpugh.

I wonder this too, but its too ballsy of a play to just blatanly say this in thread as scum. Like grandpa had no reason to make that post so its super ??

ISO'ing Hockey I found this post to be especially towny.

In post 357, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 356, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

Thanks for the guide on how to fool town for the rest of the game!

lol its funny because t3 just pasted his meta and replaced his name with ur name

VOTE: Grandpa
tfw?

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.

You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him