Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:04 pm
Which part of this was wat-worthy?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Which part of this was wat-worthy?
I didn't realize you'd done anything particularly town. My mistake Bell.In post 347, Bell wrote:I didn’t realize you weren’t very good at reading people. My mistake Mirio.
Bothering to mention us & Mirio when we are (apparently) null to you.In post 350, Romance wrote:Which part of this was wat-worthy?
That doesn't inspire confidence.Bell wrote:One of them was wrong too. :C
Did you read the post that came like five after or whatever where I said I wanted to include everyone who posted?In post 355, Mandelbrot wrote:Bothering to mention us & Mirio when we are (apparently) null to you.In post 350, Romance wrote:Which part of this was wat-worthy?
For a full reads list, it makes sense... but if we'd said nothing noteworthy and you're talking about players you have some level of a read on, why bother including 2 nulls?
- House
It's not old ground to me. I was at work all day.
Yeah. I read it.In post 359, Romance wrote:Did you read the post that came like five after or whatever where I said I wanted to include everyone who posted?In post 355, Mandelbrot wrote:Bothering to mention us & Mirio when we are (apparently) null to you.In post 350, Romance wrote:Which part of this was wat-worthy?
For a full reads list, it makes sense... but if we'd said nothing noteworthy and you're talking about players you have some level of a read on, why bother including 2 nulls?
- House
A lack of read is a read anyways, room to go one way or another and hadn't seen anything worthwhile in the 1 post you had at the time. I think it was 1.
Sounds like a you problem then.In post 362, Mandelbrot wrote:Yeah. I read it.In post 359, Romance wrote:Did you read the post that came like five after or whatever where I said I wanted to include everyone who posted?In post 355, Mandelbrot wrote:Bothering to mention us & Mirio when we are (apparently) null to you.In post 350, Romance wrote:Which part of this was wat-worthy?
For a full reads list, it makes sense... but if we'd said nothing noteworthy and you're talking about players you have some level of a read on, why bother including 2 nulls?
- House
A lack of read is a read anyways, room to go one way or another and hadn't seen anything worthwhile in the 1 post you had at the time. I think it was 1.
Don't really care.
Still don't like it.
- House
In 36 I ask about the list myself, the post after the one quoted. I follow up here, in 41.In post 41, Mirio wrote:I’m most interested in the bottom two and the Mandelbrot placement. What is AI about Mandelbrots sole post prior to that list? Why are Sakura and Dwlee so low?
Then I guess you have nothing to worry about from my pressure!In post 361, Bell wrote:You can’t discredit a scum gut read. It discredits itself.
Not following. I literally never give up as town. I doubt this game will be much different. Though my job has been very straining lately so I may collapse sometimes.
I wouldn't know that.In post 364, Mirio wrote:In 36 I ask about the list myself, the post after the one quoted. I follow up here, in 41.In post 41, Mirio wrote:I’m most interested in the bottom two and the Mandelbrot placement. What is AI about Mandelbrots sole post prior to that list? Why are Sakura and Dwlee so low?
My issue is not that you are asking questions during catchup, my issue is that the questions you are asking are rehashes of points I brought up a few posts later.
I do recall her quoting and responding to something in regards to it, but i tend to scroll quotes.In post 368, Mandelbrot wrote:I wouldn't know that.In post 364, Mirio wrote:In 36 I ask about the list myself, the post after the one quoted. I follow up here, in 41.In post 41, Mirio wrote:I’m most interested in the bottom two and the Mandelbrot placement. What is AI about Mandelbrots sole post prior to that list? Why are Sakura and Dwlee so low?
My issue is not that you are asking questions during catchup, my issue is that the questions you are asking are rehashes of points I brought up a few posts later.
I ran across that post in ISO.
And EJ is doing that?In post 370, Bell wrote:That Big sister pattern some scum do. You know, when like they’re being friendly and giving advice and don’t seem very self-serving. But it just causes them to kind of blend while posting a bunch. That plus their joke to serious post ratio tickles my scumdar.
I can dig that, plus she downright admits to a different attitude/style of interaction from her other account, which makes it more difficult to tell when her tone is genuine.In post 370, Bell wrote:That Big sister pattern some scum do. You know, when like they’re being friendly and giving advice and don’t seem very self-serving. But it just causes them to kind of blend while posting a bunch. That plus their joke to serious post ratio tickles my scumdar.