Mafiascum.net

This pagetop is actually on purpose :)

In post 349, camelCasedSnivy wrote:Why is everyone against RegRider and Prism?

I think I said I TR Prism, if I didn't I did now :3

In post 346, RH9 wrote:I kind of agree with DaTacoX's townread, but I'm not sure about Prism and RegRider. They both seem helpful and have somewhat good defences as to why they're not anti-Town.

There have to be 2 scum. Who do you think they are if not Prism and regrider?

In post 348, RegRider wrote:

In post 342, CheekyTeeky wrote:Mine would be:
Town {DTX, Margot}
Town lean {flow, RH9, camel}
Scum lean {Regrider, Connor, Prism}

Margot only made 5 posts, why do you Town read them?

Quality over quantity. I tend to assess what's in a post and think about the intent behind it.

So why would a scum Margot come in and take on a town Prism who is the most experienced player here when there was a more low key opportunity to get on board with me or camel. Let's say we end up eliminating Prism today and they flip town, what does that mean for a scum margot's chances to end game?

What's your read on them?

In post 352, flow trap wrote:

In post 349, camelCasedSnivy wrote:Why is everyone against RegRider and Prism?

I think I said I TR Prism, if I didn't I did now :3

...My interpretation of this is just an outright scum claim.

VOTE: flow trap

Maybe I'll change my mind in the morning, but there's eagerness to take another shot at something and then there's blowing past every warning sign right after the first accident.

Don't get me wrong, there are clear differences between this game and Iceland, but they're all stylistic and trivial to fake as scum, and I think you're smart enough to realize that.

To be fair, I have to say that I agree with CheekyTeeky when it comes to "quality over quantity". I agree with that even if a player posts like 90 posts, if most of the posts are filler, then a player with only 10 posts, but which are full of quality, then the player with 10 posts is, by my opinion, less likely to be scum. For this reason, now, if I had to vote anybody, it probably wouldn't be MargotRosa or CheekyTeeky. Also, don't take this as an attack. And don't worry, everybody who had not been mentioned above, I definitely not saying that you're Mafia, because everybpdy is .

*everybody

Sorry I've been out of it. Currently jumping between Diablo 2 and Political Economy readings

In post 280, Prism wrote:

In post 276, RH9 wrote:To be fair, I like how while nobody exactly townreads me, nobody completely scumreads me either. The reasoning provided by MargotRosa has convinced me to VOTE: Prism.

The crux of their case seems to be that I want to tag along to other people's (wrong) pushes so that as scum I can avoid the negatives that comes pushing people, and thus avoid pushing people myself. Rosa only comments up to my post 56, but they read to at least 105.

Do you find my distillation an accurate description, and do you believe it to be true?

That's not what I was saying at all. I'm saying that you are trying to look busy, and your votes up until that point read as pretty baseless, and transparent attempts to justify voting for someone when coming up with reads on other players is proving a bit difficult

To me, that reads as Scum. I feel like Town would spend longer trying to adequately justify their serious votes

Vote is staying put for now

Votes up until that point"

I hadn't voted. Your wall in large part centered on my refusal to vote. The vote I did wind up placing, on Camel, you did not respond to or comment on at any point. It has the most justification in the game of any given at that point.

Maybe you're a bit too out of it from Diablo 2, and have some pretty important Political Economy readings with higher priority, but you might want to work back over your own points before leaving to their defense.

In post 355, Prism wrote:

In post 352, flow trap wrote:

In post 349, camelCasedSnivy wrote:Why is everyone against RegRider and Prism?

I think I said I TR Prism, if I didn't I did now :3

...My interpretation of this is just an outright scum claim.

VOTE: flow trap

Maybe I'll change my mind in the morning, but there's eagerness to take another shot at something and then there's blowing past every warning sign right after the first accident.

In post 356, Prism wrote:Don't get me wrong, there are clear differences between this game and Iceland, but they're all stylistic and trivial to fake as scum, and I think you're smart enough to realize that.

Yeah, Idk what this means

It means I don't buy how easy that townread was to get from you.

In post 365, Prism wrote:It means I don't buy how easy that townread was to get from you.

Ah, I see, I see

In post 367, GeorgeBailey wrote:

Connordragon07 has been prodded

Literally just got the chance to check in about 5 minutes before you prodded me, did check once before I went to bed last night, but couldn't be bothered typing a post with my phone lol.

In post 349, camelCasedSnivy wrote:Why is everyone against RegRider and Prism?

tbh not sure, I feel like they're one of the more townie people rn.

In post 348, RegRider wrote:

In post 342, CheekyTeeky wrote:Mine would be:
Town {DTX, Margot}
Town lean {flow, RH9, camel}
Scum lean {Regrider, Connor, Prism}

Margot only made 5 posts, why do you Town read them?

Margot feels town based on what they've said, at least to me, but the insistence at the beginning that they thought they were filling in for mafia and were wrong feels just slightly off. I do feel like they should try to check in just a bit more, even though I can understand that they've been busy with other games.

Margot was middling for me but that last post has them in a downward spiral.

"Votes are baseless" is just such a flummoxing critique of someone who hadn't voted, especially for Margot whose entire initial critique was about my abstention from voting

In post 371, Prism wrote:"Votes are baseless" is just such a flummoxing critique of someone who hadn't voted, especially for Margot whose entire initial critique was about my abstention from voting

I suppose you're right, this does outweigh my reason for TRing them I think

I don't understand how people can TR someone based on like 4 posts. Like your reads aren't that good, guaranteed.

In post 373, RegRider wrote:I don't understand how people can TR someone based on like 4 posts. Like your reads aren't that good, guaranteed.

I mean TR can be from strong town to null/town, right?