Page 15 of 72

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:10 pm
by MafMen
In post 335, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:there's no way you're not the person I think you are

but I guess it's not implausible that you've forgotten who you are.
im starting to think maybe i shouldnt trust your reads on alignments LOL

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:11 pm
by MafMen
In post 350, MafMen wrote:
In post 335, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:there's no way you're not the person I think you are

but I guess it's not implausible that you've forgotten who you are.
im starting to think maybe i shouldnt trust your reads on alignments LOL
the more i think about it the more im absolutely fuckin confused

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:14 pm
by Prism
I'm pretty sure I figured it out and I don't even know you so F

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:15 pm
by MafMen
????????????

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:15 pm
by the worst
i simply never explain any of my reads

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:17 pm
by MafMen
i feel like somehow im being collectively trolled by everyone yet the only one i know here is the duck

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:19 pm
by Tammy
In post 348, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:oh i was talking about the scumread on duckie lol

i think it applies even more for scumreads lol
In post 88, cool cookie wrote:'the worst' initial scumping for claiming to not know the rules on page 3, when they had been referenced a couple times already by that point - potentially tricking someone into an early OMGUS trust thing. and also repeated claims Enchant is town, with no reason given.

a couple mildest of mild townpings. Liked Pookythemagicalbears opening appeal, felt genuine and performative where scum might worry about seeming needy. nothing else for now but I'm watching you.
This? The worst scum read is rather run of the mill, the kind that people and scum make all the time because it's an easy thing to point to in the thread and say I distrust this. The part of this that I do like is the tricking someone into an early omgus trust tell part. I liked it because it didn't really make all that much sense, nice infusion of attempting to interpret an action.

I didn't like the town read on you, mostly the performative part but giving a reason for why that was a mild town ping and then I didn't like the follow up but I'm watching you thing.

Cookie could be town, sure, but I don't follow your reasoning.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:19 pm
by the worst
In post 355, MafMen wrote:i feel like somehow im being collectively trolled by everyone yet the only one i know here is the duck
who are you again?

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:20 pm
by MafMen
In post 357, the worst wrote:
In post 355, MafMen wrote:i feel like somehow im being collectively trolled by everyone yet the only one i know here is the duck
who are you again?
</3
youre the only one i can trust here dont do this to me

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:22 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
our trolling game is on point

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:23 pm
by MafMen
the one person who can vouch that im a real human and not gaslight me into thinking i have an alterego does this shit rofl

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:25 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
You don't want to know what your alter ego has been up to while you've been asleep tbh

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:27 pm
by MafMen
In post 361, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:You don't want to know what your alter ego has been up to while you've been asleep tbh
ah so i got a dr jekyll situation going on here
thats rough

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:28 pm
by the worst
:lol:

mafmen is legit yeah. pooky's super secret alt will have to remain a secret, though.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:29 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
it would be such a mind fuck if Mafmen is my alt like in that movie Memento

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:30 pm
by MafMen
In post 364, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it would be such a mind fuck if Mafmen is my alt like in that movie Memento
shh you dont want us to get banned

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:31 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
you can't get banned for having bad short term memory

that would be ablelist

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:31 pm
by Prism
In post 307, Tammy wrote:
In post 290, Prism wrote:I guess part of my hesitation here is that so much of this is self-facing, and reacting to my wrong expectations to ameliorate me. There's no weaponization of the expectations you have for me, and that throws me. I was surprised to see you drop the explanation about my preference so quickly. It is a perceptive and clear divergence.
In post 291, Prism wrote:Like I'm astounded that you took the preference seriously enough to remember it and you make the connection. No one else onsite even
remembers
the preference let alone uses it.
I'm not ameliorating you; I'm just existing. I mean maybe I am? But it's not purposeful. I expect you to question me and you are. I'm sorry if I'm being weird; I'm tired, don't feel all that great, and am in a bit of a weird headspace being here today. I don't know that without that if I'd be much different, maybe I'd have more energy I don't know. I don't think I'm being very off but maybe I am.

I'm not sure why you think I would weaponize any expectations I have of you right when the game begins considering I have a tendency to observe these things for a bit anyway. The preference that you're talking about might be a bigger thing to me if we were in a normal game. The game mechanic alone goes a long way in negating that very preference. In fact, even in asking it I didn't think it really mattered much because my two pieces were is prism doing the puffery thing or does the game mechanic negate it. As far as I'm concerned, that's something I can't differentiate as it stands right now because the game mechanic exists and your approach could be very different. I'm sure if I wanted to look solvey I could make a bigger deal out of it than it was, but I'm not scum and for me it was a passing thought that stuck out enough for me to ask but not make much of.
I think "ameliorating" has a more scum-POV spin on it over a neutral one. You're just casually defying expectations and explaining defying them, which is definitely existing and casual but is very difficult for me to correctly sort.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:32 pm
by MafMen
In post 341, Infinity 324 wrote:mafmen keeps pinging me
id love if this read gets more depth
not because im annoying about people reads not having reasons
not because i get really mad at peoples scumreads on me
but because im a bad person and want scumreads on me to be indepth so i can argue about it

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:33 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
wanting to argue is scum indicative

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:33 pm
by MafMen
In post 369, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wanting to argue is scum indicative
do not tell me its not fun

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:33 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
just say you want more depth because you love people talking about you

it's more honest

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:33 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 370, MafMen wrote:
In post 369, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wanting to argue is scum indicative
do not tell me its not fun
It is very fun

and Mafia love to do it

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:34 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
mb the scum team is Tammy/Prism and they are just straight up dunking on me this game

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:35 pm
by MafMen
In post 372, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 370, MafMen wrote:
In post 369, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wanting to argue is scum indicative
do not tell me its not fun
It is very fun

and Mafia love to do it
i direct you to the first post in my iso