Ok, rereading 314 with this explanation I can see that I was misunderstanding it, as a start. I thought you were somehow correcting your earlier post, not reconsidering it live. The latter is reasonable enough. Let me go through what I'm seeing, thenIn post 327, Andante wrote:Cause I'm not really liking this whole "Andante's analysis is fake" thing, like nah, it's real, and I'm happy to explain any part, 314 yeah, what about that, instead of just "I meant..." I left my real time realization in. Corrected what I meant, why would scum even do that in the first place? I'm always open to reconsider my reads. And I will tell you, going at me like "so goal focused and fake" is not a great start...
You've said now that you're ISOing everyone but even so, this is a post you were around to comment on and didn't, at all. I find very "very bad" to be an oddly strong vibe to be able to get fromIn post 301, Andante wrote:Really bad entrance tbhIn post 8, frogsfrogs wrote:Since this is a frogs game and I have that word in my name TWICE, I think you can all see how I deserve to win by default. Everyone please respond accordingly
VOTE: Dwlee99
any
entrance post? This one seems like a real strawgrab to me. Like, why was this opinion not present before..? Can I ask what you're seeing here?You're engaging in associations here apparently before even having a read, which, again, makes me feel like you already have one in mind. Unless you actually think this is an odd enough statement to draw suspicion..? Why so??In post 302, Andante wrote:mehhh house/bugspray + frogs team?In post 42, frogsfrogs wrote:I like Datisi a lot for town for being the first to share real reads! No clue how he can read bugspray at this point but, like, I don't know anything about them and Datisi says he'll explain, so fine.
This is theIn post 304, Andante wrote:This ISO is a lot of questions, and not much analysis for the number of questions being askedIn post 112, frogsfrogs wrote:What answer do you think you'll get, asking Andante to explain why she thinks that she's a townie?In post 108, MegAzumarill wrote:Your play doesn't warrant it?
What have you done this game to make you think you should be townread?
third
and last statement you make actually reading into my posts. It is the best one though, a big picture critique that I understand your point of view on. The associations afterwards are whatever, but I find it notable how focused you are on them for this stage of the game. You've posted barely any reads all game, have done some public analysis now, but still make the majority of your posts in this section about team theorizing? It's not useless to do, but to go from associatives -> reads is not the direction I see townies taking.
You've got a few single posts about other players than me in the mix here. But again, reading so strongly from just entrances really pings me. What are you referring to here?In post 320, Andante wrote:There is no freaking way Testarossa is maf, that entrance... I never see that coming from scum, strong TR. I also just recently realized 9 people, so this game should be fairly easy
I've been busy, not unlike everyone else, and am trying to take my games one at a time because it's the first time I've ever doubled up. To 
