Mafiascum.net

In post 349, Masquerader Blue wrote:no I've already explained why I found your predecessor to be scummy

yellow ghosting the thread and not doing anything just increases the scum equity in the pair.

also I've been sitting here with my vote on your pair and noone has joined me so it just makes me feel like your pair is even more likely to have scum in it.

you aren’t reading my posts. i agree with you on yellow. i am not voting currently. i am hunting for a yellow partner if one exists before i die.

ok I think probably in the purple/olive pair if yellow is scum

In post 338, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 303, RH wrote:

In post 302, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 298, RH wrote:

In post 293, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 252, Datisi wrote:Session I concludes in 2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes.

how do deadlines work?

Assuming that it's directed at me and Datisi, I originally intended that if no players reach majority, it will be counted as a No-Lim.

However, upon realising that a majority in ELO is almost identical to Exiting the Session by a player's own accord, I'll allow plurality by seniority for ELO if ties occur.

Otherwise, there's no Plurality.

so what happens if we don't get 5 votes on a pair by the deadline?

I'll count it as a No-Lim. So nobody exits.

so what happens then? do we get a new session or do the mafia get to kill?

In post 351, Masquerader Blue wrote:ok I think probably in the purple/olive pair if yellow is scum

i am still reading. give me the two second version as to why.

mostly just game state read and fairly shitty reasons to townread magenta/teal

like if there's scum in magenta/teal I don't understand what the scum strategy is this game

In post 352, RH wrote:

In post 338, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 303, RH wrote:

In post 302, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 298, RH wrote:

In post 293, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 252, Datisi wrote:Session I concludes in 2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes.

how do deadlines work?

Assuming that it's directed at me and Datisi, I originally intended that if no players reach majority, it will be counted as a No-Lim.

However, upon realising that a majority in ELO is almost identical to Exiting the Session by a player's own accord, I'll allow plurality by seniority for ELO if ties occur.

Otherwise, there's no Plurality.

so what happens if we don't get 5 votes on a pair by the deadline?

I'll count it as a No-Lim. So nobody exits.

so what happens then? do we get a new session or do the mafia get to kill?

The Intruders are supposed to be using their Automaton during a Session so there'll be a new Session.

so if we no lim, the scum get a session to use their automata and then we get a new session?

In post 355, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 352, RH wrote:

In post 338, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 303, RH wrote:

In post 302, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 298, RH wrote:

In post 293, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 252, Datisi wrote:Session I concludes in 2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes.

how do deadlines work?

Assuming that it's directed at me and Datisi, I originally intended that if no players reach majority, it will be counted as a No-Lim.

However, upon realising that a majority in ELO is almost identical to Exiting the Session by a player's own accord, I'll allow plurality by seniority for ELO if ties occur.

Otherwise, there's no Plurality.

so what happens if we don't get 5 votes on a pair by the deadline?

I'll count it as a No-Lim. So nobody exits.

so what happens then? do we get a new session or do the mafia get to kill?

The Intruders are supposed to be using their Automaton during a Session so there'll be a new Session.

so if we no lim, the scum get a session to use their automata and then we get a new session?

In post 354, Masquerader Blue wrote:mostly just game state read and fairly shitty reasons to townread magenta/teal

like if there's scum in magenta/teal I don't understand what the scum strategy is this game

scum lurk is a strategy. i hate it but it is one.

In post 346, Masquerader Blue wrote:i liked their entry post about dancing with datisi - i read it was an attempt to disguise their identity by pretending to be someone else

Is it wise to consider that the exact nature of the automaton mechanic hadn't been revealed yet to the invitees?

In post 358, Masquerader Purple wrote:

In post 346, Masquerader Blue wrote:i liked their entry post about dancing with datisi - i read it was an attempt to disguise their identity by pretending to be someone else

Is it wise to consider that the exact nature of the automaton mechanic hadn't been revealed yet to the invitees?

I was not aware of this

it seems a like a pretty big oversight if the invitees didn't know what the mechanics behind the automata are at the beginning of the game

This is the only information teal had available, in addition to whichever role pm they recieved:

In post 3, RH wrote:

Regarding Masks

Inspired by penguin_alien and Ydrasse

Known only to their possessors!

Alas, those

Intruders

, they'll be the guessers!

How they wish to unmask you all!

How they want to use them to cause your downfall!

Beware, friends, and confide to none!

Heed this advice or you're done!

Notice

• I'm going to be lenient and allow you to change anything you want except the Login Information and all parts of your profile except Pronoun.
  
• Please use the Secret Alt as though it is your only account and only in this game.
  
• Main-slipping (or alt-slipping) will result in immediate force replacement.
  • If somebody else is force-replaced through this, avoid talking about them in the main thread.
    
  • Similar to what P_A did in Mini 2250, you may PM me to send your condolences.
• Avoid referencing mains.
  
• If there's anything else that you're unsure about, contact me or Datisi.

There is an implication that we might gain some benefit from disguising our identities effectively, which we weren't aware would tie into the mechanics until the intruder pm was posted.

Does this change your interpretation of teal's choices, new new blue?

In post 356, RH wrote:

In post 355, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 352, RH wrote:

In post 338, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 303, RH wrote:

In post 302, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 298, RH wrote:

In post 293, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 252, Datisi wrote:Session I concludes in 2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes.

how do deadlines work?

Assuming that it's directed at me and Datisi, I originally intended that if no players reach majority, it will be counted as a No-Lim.

However, upon realising that a majority in ELO is almost identical to Exiting the Session by a player's own accord, I'll allow plurality by seniority for ELO if ties occur.

Otherwise, there's no Plurality.

so what happens if we don't get 5 votes on a pair by the deadline?

I'll count it as a No-Lim. So nobody exits.

so what happens then? do we get a new session or do the mafia get to kill?

The Intruders are supposed to be using their Automaton during a Session so there'll be a new Session.

so if we no lim, the scum get a session to use their automata and then we get a new session?

Sorry for the confusion. They don't get a seperate Session, it moves to Session II directly and they can use their Automata while the Invitees decide for an elimination.

Will we be notified when an automata is released and who the target was, even if the attack fails?

In post 362, Masquerader Purple wrote:

In post 356, RH wrote:

In post 355, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 352, RH wrote:

In post 338, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 303, RH wrote:

In post 302, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 298, RH wrote:

In post 293, Masquerader Blue wrote:

In post 252, Datisi wrote:Session I concludes in 2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes.

how do deadlines work?

Assuming that it's directed at me and Datisi, I originally intended that if no players reach majority, it will be counted as a No-Lim.

However, upon realising that a majority in ELO is almost identical to Exiting the Session by a player's own accord, I'll allow plurality by seniority for ELO if ties occur.

Otherwise, there's no Plurality.

so what happens if we don't get 5 votes on a pair by the deadline?

I'll count it as a No-Lim. So nobody exits.

so what happens then? do we get a new session or do the mafia get to kill?

The Intruders are supposed to be using their Automaton during a Session so there'll be a new Session.

so if we no lim, the scum get a session to use their automata and then we get a new session?

Sorry for the confusion. They don't get a seperate Session, it moves to Session II directly and they can use their Automata while the Invitees decide for an elimination.

Will we be notified when an automata is released and who the target was, even if the attack fails?

Thank you.

yes I guess it makes that reason to town-read him invalid and moves him closer to neutral for me

his continued absence also is kind of a thing >.>

Does anyone townread Yellow?

VOTE: Yellow

Yellow stood out to me as someone I want to sort. I also want to see how my townreads react.

yellow posted a few posts in our pt. disappointed yellow didn’t post in thread. it looks like yellow posted sporadic wine and gave up. barring any actual effort i will take out yellow but would want to see teal and magenta and olive post things to make sure it’s not just apathy. i would like discussion focused on other slots.

these are wine reads of yellows so i don’t take much stock until yellow posts them. yellow intruder reads purple and changes their mind on blue. that’s it for reads.

The players I am probably currently the most concerned about would probably be Teal/Yellow based mostly on what they’re partners are saying about them.

malding