Page 15 of 26

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:36 am
by JunkoChan
In post 349, Lucian wrote:Why?
Idk

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:37 am
by JunkoChan
Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:50 am
by Lucian
Well I cannot disagree more, both with that read and with that mindset, but it fits with the idea of town-you I have in mind, so like, okay.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:55 am
by Vanderscamp
In post 314, Dannflor wrote:is it better to swap Vanderscamp for ydrasse? I am worried if it's wrong that Vanderscamp seems very miselimable

I want the scum in the coalition to have to fight hard
Don't worry about me!

I'll fight hard to prevent being miskilled, just put in your top towns

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:59 am
by Vanderscamp
In post 329, Lucian wrote:Is it egoistical of me to scumread Vanders based on the fact that he seems to townread me and wants me in his coalition, but is doing virtually nothing to actually convince anyone of it, or at least engage with other people's scumreads of me?
This is a good question.
I don't feel so strongly about it to feel the need to convince other people.
My case on you being town isn't much more than leaning towards genuineness on your part, and liking the way in which you evaluated one of your reads.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:00 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?
I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:04 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?

Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:05 pm
by Vanderscamp
HEAL: Vanderscamp, Lucian, Menalque, Una, Dann

I was going to swap Junko for Dann before seeing that post anyway, but that read from Junko ensured it, Junko is actively banned from my circle atm.


Why is Junko in other circles?

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:06 pm
by Vanderscamp
Open question to whoever has them in one

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:06 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 352, Lucian wrote:Well I cannot disagree more, both with that read and with that mindset, but it fits with the idea of town-you I have in mind, so like, okay.
Can you elaborate on why you think this?
The second part, I agree the read/mindset is weird

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:21 pm
by Una
is townie. Some of her other posts could be mafia so I guess I'm not adamant about cycling her out.

I guess as I write this post maybe it's not that townie, my kneejeek is that 311 is townie.

It's like
A failure to write fiction, as the alignment that gets to
There's not even "you are until the Dannflor wall was so amazing" or whatever

But maybe it's wolfy in the sense that she just bailed on the opportunity to talk about her other townreads.
But also maybe she's not going at the game at a level of effort commensurate with such a supplementary remark anyway. So maybe I shouldn't deduct from my kneejerk

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:21 pm
by Una
Mafia is hard

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:27 pm
by JunkoChan
In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?
I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.
In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?

Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
this is a contradiction you know?

you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.

HURT: Vanderscamp

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:32 pm
by JunkoChan
HEAL: Una, Menalque, Dannfloor, Ydrasse, junkoChan

there you go

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:34 pm
by Una
Hypocrisy Is Not A Scumtell

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:35 pm
by Dannflor
In post 238, Una wrote:
In post 223, Dannflor wrote:I also really keep coming back to 212 and wondering why you made it. It doesn't feel like its purpose is to sort Una's alignment, especially because you happily threw her in a coalition shortly after.
In post 219, Una wrote:
In post 202, Dannflor wrote:Una where is your
Whimsy posting
I'm ladylike and refined.
Nobody likes whimsy posting.
In post 223, Dannflor wrote:HEAL: junkochan, menalque, una, unwnd, ydrasse

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:38 pm
by Dannflor
this is a joke

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:39 pm
by Dannflor
I don't think vanderscamp is really being hypocritical anyway because activity alone is often NAI due to IRL influences

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:51 pm
by Una
In post 365, Dannflor wrote:
In post 238, Una wrote:
In post 223, Dannflor wrote:I also really keep coming back to 212 and wondering why you made it. It doesn't feel like its purpose is to sort Una's alignment, especially because you happily threw her in a coalition shortly after.
In post 219, Una wrote:
In post 202, Dannflor wrote:Una where is your
Whimsy posting
I'm ladylike and refined.
Nobody likes whimsy posting.
In post 223, Dannflor wrote:HEAL: junkochan, menalque, una, unwnd, ydrasse
I did not post that because it indicates you are mafia. I posted it because it was very funny to me.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:53 pm
by Una
Anyway on a separate topic in starting to worry that excluding Vanderscamp from the coalition is a throw

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:53 pm
by Una
*I am starting

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:58 pm
by Una
It did remind me of my own rule about hypocrisy. My follow up questions were actually more so about smooth vs. jerky vs. plausible vs. Implausible read progression on my slot which has nothing to do with hypocrisy in how it can reveal alignment

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:01 pm
by Dannflor
I think swapping in vanderscamp for someone is a good idea I just don’t know who yet

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:06 pm
by unwnd
My coalition choices are pretty good imho

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:18 pm
by Ydrasse
HEAL: dannflor, una, vanderscamp

mulling over the junkoposts of late