Mafiascum.net

Not sure which head is posting but your other head was a bit aloof/lacking emotion in their posts, which made it harder to read. I almost started to think it was intentional

In post 3499, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 3495, unwnd wrote:

In post 3492, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 3489, unwnd wrote:Don't agree with targeting Flavor Leaf, if there exists a beneficial role that involves results/protection then there is likely something scum has to counteract this. That's just basic setup philosophy. I think you should protect someone who is town who isn't spearheading conversation but something scum would consider a safe kill. Then I think you should roleblock a lurker slot and see what comes of it. Wildcard? Do something controversial.

You realize I'm the role that got an investigation, right

Yes and I'm saying now that you're outed, scum is likely going to try and stop you from getting investigations. I can't see an investigation role just having free reign in a 22-player setup.

That's fine. They don't know how my role works.

i will also bump that there are 2 of us

plus a competent towncore

so.

In post 3497, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:I appreciate you not sitting on Guillotina, even if it's just temporary Flavor.

I get wanting to take a shot on a scumread but I just...really don't see them as scum based off that interaction w/ Gamma.

Just trying to figure out which one of us is right with confirmation from a flip.

In post 3501, L4pe wrote:

In post 3499, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 3495, unwnd wrote:

In post 3492, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 3489, unwnd wrote:Don't agree with targeting Flavor Leaf, if there exists a beneficial role that involves results/protection then there is likely something scum has to counteract this. That's just basic setup philosophy. I think you should protect someone who is town who isn't spearheading conversation but something scum would consider a safe kill. Then I think you should roleblock a lurker slot and see what comes of it. Wildcard? Do something controversial.

You realize I'm the role that got an investigation, right

Yes and I'm saying now that you're outed, scum is likely going to try and stop you from getting investigations. I can't see an investigation role just having free reign in a 22-player setup.

That's fine. They don't know how my role works.

i will also bump that there are 2 of us

plus a competent towncore

so.

Yes, but I was trying not to out you, and have scum force all their stuff on me.

If l4pe is town then I definitely think Beeboy was just nuthugging to two townies as scum lol

I'm going to go ahead and claim my role, but I don't want this to prompt other people to claim their roles as well, we don't need all the information out there at once.

This also ties into why I thought Noraa's role was believable.

Flavor-wise, I'm Fan la Norne

Mechanics-wise:
If I'm targeted at another Blade, I prevent them from using the action they are using that night the next night.
If I'm targeted at a Driver, they permanently lose all of their passive abilities.

In both cases, the target is informed that this has happened to them.

I'm either not using my ability, or I need a target, or pool of targets

In post 3500, unwnd wrote:Not sure which head is posting but your other head was a bit aloof/lacking emotion in their posts, which made it harder to read. I almost started to think it was intentional

peta plays how peta wants, sometimes it's Assassin in FGO and sometimes it's this.

I'm happy to let him. I got to flex on him with Cakez but I still have complete faith in the President.

All of the posts with capitalization are me, some of the lowercase ones today are too but it's like half/half

In post 3504, unwnd wrote:If l4pe is town then I definitely think Beeboy was just nuthugging to two townies as scum lol

would not put it past him

zzz

In post 3505, Dunnstral wrote:I'm going to go ahead and claim my role, but I don't want this to prompt other people to claim their roles as well, we don't need all the information out there at once.

This also ties into why I thought Noraa's role was believable.

Flavor-wise, I'm Fan la Norne

Mechanics-wise:
If I'm targeted at another Blade, I prevent them from using the action they are using that night the next night.
If I'm targeted at a Driver, they permanently lose all of their passive abilities.

In both cases, the target is informed that this has happened to them.

I'm either not using my ability, or I need a target, or pool of targets

Hmmm... Okay who do you want giving you your pool? Who is your masonry this game?

In post 3508, Cabd wrote:Hmmm... Okay who do you want giving you your pool?

You and Flavor and whoever else you want

In post 3505, Dunnstral wrote:If I'm targeted at another Blade, I prevent them from using the action they are using that night the next night.

Delayed roleblock?

Beeboy/Noraa/Cakez/??/??

Sounds like a really boring team but whatever. Even more boring if I slot someone like ManWithNoName...

In post 3510, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 3505, Dunnstral wrote:If I'm targeted at another Blade, I prevent them from using the action they are using that night the next night.

Delayed roleblock?

Yes, but only for the ability they used

{Beeboy, Nora, Cakez, LLD, Guill}?

that's essentially like an indecisive-ifier but for power instead of target

In post 3512, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3510, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 3505, Dunnstral wrote:If I'm targeted at another Blade, I prevent them from using the action they are using that night the next night.

Delayed roleblock?

Yes, but only for the ability they used

So it's like the move Disable.

I think it's pretty random to call beeboy scum

Thing is, I don't see scum-dunn walking in here and making that sort of claim right after seeing how noraa's claim went down.

Dunn I'm going to target you, and I have reasons to do so

After talking it over with Reagan, we're fine saying we didn't link.

Bell, we would really like to link with you if Cabd is fine handing you off.

Cabd: Can you loan us a Bell?

In post 3518, unwnd wrote:Dunn I'm going to target you, and I have reasons to do so

ok

In post 3516, Dunnstral wrote:I think it's pretty random to call beeboy scum

nah
this is a p dumb rule but essentailly I believe if beebs doesn't obvtown he's scum
he hasn't obvtowned this game and in fact has felt a little scummy

I don't mind being targeted by Dunn.

Don't know what it would accomplish, but there you go.

The POE is hella shrinking.... so all scum within this list is actually possible maybe?

4 in this 6 (well, 3 in 5, because noraa is conf) would be insane levels of cohesion though...


Lady Lambdadelta
beeboy
ManWithNoName
Will catch up later maybe
Guillotina
noraa

In post 3517, Cabd wrote:Thing is, I don't see scum-dunn walking in here and making that sort of claim right after seeing how noraa's claim went down.

I agree, right now I think he's town and I made a presumptuous read on him based on Noraa