Page 142 of 257

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:29 pm
by Transcend
suddenlyarabbit is town. let's
In post 3489, Dunnstral wrote:H A M M E R

P E R F O R M E R

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:30 pm
by beeboy
How mad would you all be if I hammered preformer in my next post?

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:31 pm
by Transcend
not in the slightest bit, but i think he's l-2 now.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:31 pm
by Zachstralkita
In post 3524, Dunnstral wrote:Hey Zach

Who else do you think is mafia, aside from performer? What do you think of the possibility of scum wake


Hey Mirhawk, what do you think of this performer wagon?


Wake is town but he's kooky

Podo mafia

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:31 pm
by beeboy
k set me up for the hammer transcend and I will do it

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:33 pm
by Transcend
i'm already voting. ask dunnstral.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:33 pm
by beeboy
Dunnstral set me up for the hammer pls

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:34 pm
by Dunnstral
Nah I'm not into the whole quickhammer business. You can vote if you so choose, though

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:34 pm
by Zachstralkita
Beeboy hammer him smite the scum

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:34 pm
by beeboy
I want to hammer but someone needs to set me up :/

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:35 pm
by Dunnstral
Hey guys he has to like

Claim and stuff

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:40 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3324, implosion wrote:
Mirhawk wrote:I kinda agree with the sentiment that there was likely no scum in most of the latter people on Ved's wagon. But I probably wouldn't apply that to Dunn and Shannon as the writing was on the wall by that point so I could see bussing happening there.
Read: "I don't want to look weird for disagreeing with this sentiment but I don't want it to prevent me from pushing on Dunn or shannon even though them being town is 40% of what the sentiment says." Saying that he agrees with the sentiment and then essentially discounting it wholesale by saying that 40% of the 5 people that have been called town for it are scum is just posturing.
I thought it was six people. In any case I'm saying I agree that the first three (or four if it was six) are probably town since that was a flashwagon and there is no reason for scum to participate on a sudden flashwagon on their temmate. The last couple are less likely to be town becuase at that point they probably know they're close to a lynch and don't want to be seen being off the wagon or want the towncred it provides.

If you want to assume all of them are town good on you. I'm saying I wouldn't.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:41 pm
by Mirhawk
is performer close to being lynched? I'm not completely up yet?

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:41 pm
by Dunnstral
Yeah they're L-2

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:41 pm
by Mirhawk
I don't even know the case on performer.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:45 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3330, Wake1 wrote:Willing to Lynch Titus/Dunnstral Day 2?

(If you're playing please answer with 'Yes' or 'No.')
Wake this is very silly. Titus and Dunnestel aren't a two pack. I would lynch Dunn, but not Titus. I'm curious how that fits into your chart.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:49 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3336, Zachstralkita wrote:And in the fucking parallel universe where Dunn IS scum, why would he claim vigilante when he could have just left it for the town to speculate about Lapsa's death? Is there something hard-coded into your DNA that says dumb gambits like the fake mason claim have to be scum?
For the record claiming a one shot vig and stacking it on top of the nightkill is incredibly convenient if you don't want to ever have to prove your claim.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:53 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3355, Transcend wrote:Is there anything besides meta of that game that you wanna use to validate your point? It's fairly solid right now, it's just some people (myself included but I think Dunn!Town) won't be super convinced if your argument for a slot being town is SOLELY based on meta.
I'm moderately amazed you thought Titus had any sort of reason ASIDE from meta.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:10 pm
by Mirhawk
OK I found AGar's sparknotes edition on performer. It's pretty convincing, I mean I can't really think of any good reason to not vote performer after reading that.

Is the reason everyone else is voting him because of those points? I'm getting a serious lurker lynch vibe here and I typically avoid those.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:17 pm
by Transcend
okay suddenlyarabbit can you please vote performer

beeboy you should hammer it too if you're still around

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:19 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3444, Airick10 wrote:I'm open to lynching Performer. His D1 voting actions make me suspicious of him. Why was Vedith not in his lynch pool, then sneaks in an early vote on Vedith and keeps it there? Bussing Vedith is entirely possible. I read scum actions.

I'm not voting for Performer just yet in hopes that we are able to get anything else out of him or any word on a replacement. Again, I don't like lynching someone that doesn't give us much info to work with on D3. I'm going to be out the next few hours and read up. If I still get silence from anything Performer or news on a replacement, I'll vote him.
This is weak as hell.

In the first paragraph he agrees with performer being likely scum, but by the end he doesn't want to go there because he doesn't think we'll get enough information. Follows up with a he'll go there if he has to.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:20 pm
by Mirhawk
Who the heck is suddenlyarabbit?

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:22 pm
by Mirhawk
In post 3465, beeboy wrote:I like Shannon and Zach for town btw
Shannon, no thanks.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:27 pm
by Dunnstral
We're not ending this day until I find out what Transcend's hangman phrase was.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:27 pm
by Transcend
In post 3546, Mirhawk wrote:Who the heck is suddenlyarabbit?
here's a little hint:

they sleep in the same bed as you.

shannon's town dude and i have my account on the line on this one.