Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2020 10:08 pm
If he was revealed as a cop he'd also have to clear inno 3 players / fake claim he checked at least 2 dead people which would make him look really bad.
In post 239, bob3141 wrote:You say he votes for the same player that you voted for after calling your rad weird. But what do you think of nick read on the same player and how does that affect your read on sala.In post 179, joges wrote:In post 122, joges wrote:VOTE: Salamence
Seems a good way to make town not care about the game is to lull them to depression with negative insight.
Honestly, this is a stretch, but nothing else has stood out.
Concerning the self vote, it's RVS. And no amount of making it anything more than that will make it more than that.In post 149, Nicholai wrote:joges' read sure is weird though, people come up with the craziest ideas of how scum are doing crazy strats like "making town not care about the game to lull them to depression with negative insight." when in reality scum are just trying to appear not scummy 95% of the timeIn post 152, Nicholai wrote:VOTE: Salamence his ISO is sludgy
(note this is not an OMGUS, i actually intuitively townread people who vote me by default)122 - I vote Sala, and mention it's a stretch for my reason but it's all that stood out.In post 173, Nicholai wrote:what what what? i was disagreeing with your read and basically calling it reaching actuallyIn post 163, joges wrote:This feels misreppy.. Like you want to distance yourself from my read by saying something I already said when I made the vote. Like you just wanted to make sure the same words were in your ISO.In post 149, Nicholai wrote:joges' read sure is weird though, people come up with the craziest ideas of how scum are doing crazy strats like "making town not care about the game to lull them to depression with negative insight." when in reality scum are just trying to appear not scummy 95% of the time
149 - You call my already self-proclaimed shaky read "weird"
152 - 3 posts later you vote for Sala.
173 - you claim to disagree with my read, while voting my read, and yet I'm supposed to think you're "disagreeing with me"?
In post 519, bob3141 wrote:In post 469, Flavor Leaf wrote:Knowing you, would she not try to get you on her side early as scum?
How would scum her be different?
Post like this is making me lean towards FL being town this game. Its not like his last game where he was scum. As although many players scum read him he was very oily and was only lynched day 3 i think. Even though there had been pushs on him day 1 and day 2.
Here i get none of that feeling but a sense of openess from him. Both in his questioning but most in his evaluation. That last game he never realy asked question but pushed this case or that case
In post 1636, bob3141 wrote:
I think it is bad and just as suspect as kanna and invis votes. As thats teh first tiem nom slot was pushed to l-2 and quickly followed by invis. When it dropped back down to l-2 kanna jumped on it with so little progression. But so far i feel that first wagon on rex feels suspect.
SausasaurusRex (4): Invisibility, kanna, Non lmh, Ankamius
If it were not for my bad feelign over that first wagon then maybe i would see rex vote differntly. As looking it independently of my read on him from that wagon. It does share similar hall marks to how invis/kanna voted for nom. But then when you look at rex iso it is grounded in allot more interaction as apposed to the other two. And appears to me as although he scum read nom due to her push no gjt. As unlike invis and kanna his vote was never on gjt. So in isolation it does look just as bad but as part of his iso and vca it inherently has a much more cohesive progression
As although looker was the hammer and had joined gjt he had joined gjt just after nom went up to l-1, keeping it at tied 5 5. But he never realy tried to push gjt wagon over noms. And implied he would back after gjt gave him his answers. And his intereactions with nom in the vca of the end day wagon and day leave me with gut feeling that he is town. I feel for looker to be noms partner he would have had to done some convincing theater
where fl generaly day one felt towny to me. And although flav is known for doing gambits e.g. double no kill. But woud he realy push a lynch of his partner that he woudl know is a joat.
In post 3532, Auro wrote:I'm cool with bob, but then let's hear from everyone first - and Bob, claim.
If you're doing my work for me, why would I push on it? I don't follow.In post 3540, Flavor Leaf wrote:And if he were scum he’d have pushed more on the me supposed to sheep.
Anybody could... but it's a pretty sub-optimal kill, because I literally said she's scumclaiming. Unless scum has some non-vanilla role they don't want Titus to see -- and I feel like this is low % -- they would've just leave her alive and kill someone else who's widely townread (like you). I would've been hard-pushing her today, free mislynch.In post 3406, insomnia wrote:Titus was a fucking cop
Why are we even discussing the nightkill here and who would make it? Everyone would.
bob's the first vote on Pine, do you really think he was bussing? When there's a chance of other investigatives in the game and 3 lynches for town? Would bob be this ballsy as a scum partner to Pine?In post 3243, bob3141 wrote:Titus why do you not want someone that is barley posting.
Claimed pine claimed he wanted to reevaluate when he unvoted auro and taht was 3 days ago. he the only reasons he gave for his on vote auro other than he wanted to sheep flav. Was that he though auro was stalling
Pine who do you think is scum. So far you have just prodged all game. You say auro was stalling but dont you think the same could be said about you.