Nachomamma8 wrote:And tomorrow, people aren't going to claim who they stalked?
Uhm .... thinking that over
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:14 pm
by hitogoroshi
I've done some thought on it. We don't claim who we're stalking tonight, but we claim tomorrow, success or failure. Don't want to get in a huge in-depth discussion as to why because I don't want to let the cult in on my thought process.
Ben, I don't really want town to give up an action for no reason, and one rob alone is free. Mind if I (or some other townread of yours) take over one of your robs so we get one more town action in the mix? I understand that you've elected your townreads to stalk, but they can still rob AND stalk so townies aren't having not-free robs.
1. You mentioned it was an ordered list. My advice for the stalkers is - disregard the 'order'. I want cult to have NO idea who on that list is getting the stalk treatment. My advice is to remove anyone you're not super-happy about stalking and then roll a die for the rest.
2. I seem to remember Feysal being semi-confirmed from some thread happening? I'd appreciate someone with a sharper memory to confirm/deny this one.
Working on the updated reference, should be in your grubby hands Tuesday night sometime. (I have a Latin final in 14 hours to worry about first.)
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:21 pm
by hitogoroshi
EBWOP: Also, any chance we could add Andrius to that list? Still skeevy about him taking obsession and immediately trying to get rid of it (if you didn't want to use commune a bunch the fuck would you take obsession for) but that's a better vig than a lynch, I feel.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:26 pm
by Nachomamma8
Fey was the other guy to rez Wicked.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:28 pm
by hitogoroshi
Ah yeah. With Wicked's townflip, I think Feysal is a fairly likely townie. Something to look in to in a few days, sure, but not on the same scale as the rest of that list.
Nominate Feysal to be removed from the list of potential stalk targets
.
(you can replace him with Andrius so the number stays the same )
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:28 pm
by Benmage
Feysal was second, first I believe being nachos spot. Also nachos spot was communed by triglav.
I don't really get why Feysal or AV are on the stalk list. Also, I don't think Nacho being communed clears him (or even makes him all that much less likely) of being cult. Other than that, the list looks ok to me.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:33 am
by AurorusVox
I think Ben just has a hate on for me because I rode his ass raw about not going through with his stalk...
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:09 am
by Iecerint
The basis of the claim was that scumFeysal may have lied about his action, since beating the cult kill becomes overdetermined if his intervention is considered. I don't think it has anything to do with Wicked's alignment...we pretty much knew he was town from D2 s/p no other revive claims the same night.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:59 am
by Wraith
Fine, I guess I'm stalking then?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:03 am
by Trilobite
Unvote, Vote: Spy
That puts Spy at nine votes. Vote count is on this page even, no excuses.
Would also echo Seacore and Hito by asking Andrius be put on the stalk list please. At absolute best he is a chronic lurker, still think he is likely scum though. Rest of the list looks good.
~Sotty
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:31 am
by kunkstar7
So looking at the stalk-kill dealio I think it's good. Had we had any rogue murderers I would be wary of the amount of sanctioned stalkers but we seem to be lucky in that aspect, I do foresee some cross-stalking though, with 5? stalkers and 8? targets. We'll just have to evaluate those claims when they come.
VP Baltar wrote:I don't really get why Feysal or AV are on the stalk list. Also, I don't think Nacho being communed clears him (or even makes him all that much less likely) of being cult. Other than that, the list looks ok to me.
Nacho's slot in addition to being communed claimed the rez on wicked before Feysal.
AurorusVox wrote:I think Ben just has a hate on for me because I rode his ass raw about not going through with his stalk...
Which was such horrid logic. You actually thought I was scum creating some insane gamble instead of seeing the simple logical truth.
Then there was the whole having occult books..not having occult books....Yeah I think you're best grave robbing tonight.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:30 am
by Benmage
Wraith wrote:Fine, I guess I'm stalking then?
Yeah, that'll probably be best for you.
@Hito I want to make sure we see ELG's and SpyreX's flip. I can only be 100% sure with myself being a rob graver on both. I think me double rob graving for just tonight is fine.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:32 am
by Benmage
And VPB/Hito/Sea seeing as you are 3 of the 4/5 stalkers....You guys simply don't have to stalk Feysal or AV, or anyone you dislike on the list.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:44 am
by VP Baltar
benmage wrote:Nacho's slot in addition to being communed claimed the rez on wicked before Feysal.
Well, scum know who they killed. In fact, I would almost expect scum to claim first if they failed at killing. But whatever. I think you need to be looking at play, and as far as I'm concerned, Feysal looks much more protown than Nacho or NPAU ever did.
ben wrote:And VPB/Hito/Sea seeing as you are 3 of the 4/5 stalkers....You guys simply don't have to stalk Feysal or AV, or anyone you dislike on the list.
I realize this, but I'm just voicing dissent because us killing town players is still bad even if we're moving forward with a stalk-murder plan. I hate to vocalize like this because it does point out to the scum who I am more likely to go after, but if our NK plan goes sideways (ie, we hit all town or something) we're going to be in a deep dark place real soon. So, ultimately it is your choice who goes on there, but I am still going to want it to be filled with people I think have a high probability of being scum.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:48 am
by AurorusVox
Benmage wrote:Which was such horrid logic. You actually thought I was scum creating some insane gamble instead of seeing the simple logical truth.
No; I admitted that you were town AFTER you had completed the stalk/murder attempt. Before that, you had NOTHING to back up your stalk claim. I could turn around and say: "Oh, hey, I stalked XXX" and if I then didn't follow through with it, that WOULDN'T make me town, would it? Saying anything else is the horrid logic.
Benmage wrote:Then there was the whole having occult books..not having occult books....Yeah I think you're best grave robbing tonight.
If I was cult, why would I not have just lied and continued to say that I had books? I mistook what item I'd searched for N0, and then acknowledged the mistake. If I was cult, on the other hand, I'd know which of the zero insanity people really had zero insanities (i.e. which ones weren't cult) and fabricate a result that would be impossible to distinguish from the real result, which would ALSO enable me to explain away an insanity. Admitting I'd made a mistake makes NO cult sense whatsoever. This is further horrid logic.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:59 am
by Benmage
AurorusVox wrote:
Benmage wrote:Which was such horrid logic. You actually thought I was scum creating some insane gamble instead of seeing the simple logical truth.
No; I admitted that you were town AFTER you had completed the stalk/murder attempt. Before that, you had NOTHING to back up your stalk claim. I could turn around and say: "Oh, hey, I stalked XXX" and if I then didn't follow through with it, that WOULDN'T make me town, would it?
Saying anything else is the horrid logic
.
Suggesting Cult was making the gamble, and wanting the act followed through is one thing. But you believed that I was cult lying to be the case over me being town/stalking. I.E. you believed the farfetched slight chance conclusion over the 10X more logical one.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:10 pm
by AurorusVox
Benmage wrote:(1) Suggesting Cult was making the gamble, and wanting the act followed through is one thing. (2) But you believed that I was cult lying to be the case over me being town/stalking. I.E. you believed the farfetched slight chance conclusion over the 10X more logical one.
How does (1) =/= (2)?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:37 pm
by totallynotmafia
Sorry guys have been hectically moving house for the past four days and haven't had access to the internet, I'll make a proper post tonight, please don't end the day before then.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:41 pm
by xvart
I would prefer Plum with Benmage on the El Goosuki grave rob because I'm most concerned about her being Cult.
Also, have we thought ahead to the possible pile of bodies tomorrow?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:41 pm
by xvart
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:10 pm
by Benmage
xvart wrote:I would prefer Plum with Benmage on the El Goosuki grave rob because I'm most concerned about her being Cult.
Also, have we thought ahead to the possible pile of bodies tomorrow?