Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:32 am
↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:Naw, not where I come from...other than to taunt...
you have proved nothing, just a bunch of blah blah blah blah blah
Why weren't you vigged
Why weren't you vigged
Page 143 of 165
Why weren't you vigged
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:34 am
↑ TiphaineDeath wrote:Given the level of apathy in this game I'm not sure that logic is safe DGB.
imma echo this thought and also say that iirc PN was
never at l-1
I don't see where/how DGB is coming from, and (while I'm guilty of it) I don't like how DGB only pulls this out after the day where PN was in any danger of being lynched
it feels like she's grasping at straws
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:35 am
↑ Saki wrote:↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:Naw, not where I come from...other than to taunt...
you have proved nothing, just a bunch of blah blah blah blah blah
Why weren't you vigged
*sigh*
i'd vig you personally and publicly but certain things prevent me from doing so
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:59 am
SKOT is town, I will never vote for SKOT.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:00 am
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:04 am
UNLYNCHABLE TOWNIES
DrippingGoofball
Jon_h61
Sharpest-knife-on-tree
UNWASHED MASSES
Saki
TiphaineDeath
Xayzeck
Jordan_Downey
RachMarie
SCUM
Perpetual Nonsense
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:10 am
Field Polarity:
Light
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:13 am
Prodding Jon_h61 and RachMarie.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:16 am
↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:SKOT is town, I will never vote for SKOT.
im convinced that hes town but i wont be sorry to see him go especially before when he really starts to matter
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:17 am
and dgb shows no reaction/interest towards me whatsoever so I'll just stop talking to her in general
anyways
vote rach everyone
saki off
anyways
vote rach everyone
saki off
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:18 am
Also, as a side note, could the members of the Jordan_Downey hydra please post in their hydra account.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:47 am
seriously, when an investegator has said over and over someone is scum and they end up dead, what I come from that person is turbolynched and we move on. It is really simple. I do not understand the lack of this.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:52 am
↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:seriously, when an investegator has said over and over someone is scum and they end up dead, what I come from that person is turbolynched and we move on. It is really simple. I do not understand the lack of this.
↑ PeregrineV wrote:"But Pere, you're not voting Saki!"
Yeah, he could be an innocent victim of whiteknighting/buddying/
If an investigator expresses his doubts about someone being scum, and opts to pursue another scumread in a process that's (looking from an objective point of view) his own logic and not a guilty he has, AND TO TOP IT OFF HE HASN'T ACTUALLY CLAIMED A GUILTY, please assume that he didn't actually have a guilty.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:53 am
btw you keep mentioning 'where I come from'
after this game is over please fuck the hell off back to 'where you come from'
after this game is over please fuck the hell off back to 'where you come from'
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:02 am
↑ Saki wrote:↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:seriously, when an investegator has said over and over someone is scum and they end up dead, what I come from that person is turbolynched and we move on. It is really simple. I do not understand the lack of this.
↑ PeregrineV wrote:"But Pere, you're not voting Saki!"
Yeah, he could be an innocent victim of whiteknighting/buddying/
If an investigator expresses his doubts about someone being scum, and opts to pursue another scumread in a process that's (looking from an objective point of view) his own logic and not a guilty he has, AND TO TOP IT OFF HE HASN'T ACTUALLY CLAIMED A GUILTY, please assume that he didn't actually have a guilty.
I never stated he had a guilty. I am saying what his play indicated. You need to be lynched. Simple.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:05 am
never fear, when what I am currently playing in, is over, I am going back to where I come from because the arrogance, group think, and other nonsense that goes on here is really beyond what I can bear, and I have tried. Now that being said, you need to be lynched. You are most likely scum. It is time for you to go.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:19 am
oops sorry everyone been a rough few days
I am VT
Could someone besides Saki who is being rather OMGUS explain the case on me?
I am VT
Could someone besides Saki who is being rather OMGUS explain the case on me?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:22 am
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:38 am
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:39 am
↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:
there is no real case, there are 2 folks on you likely scum...
and yes, this is the claim I anticipated here...
So what else will scum claim with a dead tracker?
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:58 am
I'm sorry you're being driven away SKOT, despite the difficulties I have reading you and how differently you play I actually genuinely enjoy playing with you, I suspect there are many other people who would say the same. It's not like we can force you to change your mind but I'd ask you to take a little time to think about it first.
Back to the game though, @Rach, my vote on you is entirely based on wagon analysis, Saki's was detailed in 3515 I believe, and PN..... PN may well be scum and is either bussing or a reason to get off your wagon, I'm not sure yet.
In fact, as I'm writing this I just realized something, PN was the second vote on the Rach wagon, and with only 2-3 scum left there is no way in hell PN and Rach are scum together.
I just went and Iso'd PN and found 4, count them 4, mentions of rach all game. None of the first three with the slightest push towards her being scummy. And the fourth is a vote.
I am going to go ahead and call right now that Rach/PN are not on the same team, and at this point I think PN is more likely scum
VOTE: PN, Hey DBG, let's do this shit.
Back to the game though, @Rach, my vote on you is entirely based on wagon analysis, Saki's was detailed in 3515 I believe, and PN..... PN may well be scum and is either bussing or a reason to get off your wagon, I'm not sure yet.
In fact, as I'm writing this I just realized something, PN was the second vote on the Rach wagon, and with only 2-3 scum left there is no way in hell PN and Rach are scum together.
I just went and Iso'd PN and found 4, count them 4, mentions of rach all game. None of the first three with the slightest push towards her being scummy. And the fourth is a vote.
I am going to go ahead and call right now that Rach/PN are not on the same team, and at this point I think PN is more likely scum
VOTE: PN, Hey DBG, let's do this shit.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:42 am
↑ aphix wrote:↑ Perpetual Nonsense wrote:↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:Still if you're scum, you come and hammer this townie.
You don't even know if scum were already on the wagon, unless you're scum.
I was unfortunately thinking the same thing. The logic is flawed. What if any remaining scum are within DrippingGoofball, Jon_h61, TiphaineDeath? That would mean no scum to hammer. Not to mention he was at l-2 as far as I can see at deadline. Even if he was town and there were two scum left off the wagon, I don't see scum quick hammering when it's pretty apparent we have a vig. That's suicide.
Sorry, could have sworn I logged in on hydra to post that.
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:58 am
Hey Saki, I don't get your post 3569, wouldn't a dead tracker make it more likely for scum to claim PR's since they can't be caught lying anymore?
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:15 am
↑ TiphaineDeath wrote:Hey Saki, I don't get your post 3569, wouldn't a dead tracker make it more likely for scum to claim PR's since they can't be caught lying anymore?
refer to dgb's sig
Claiming VT has less strings attached and has less to explain than claiming a PR.
even with a dead tracker
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:19 am
The Collective is heading out to celebrate Labor Day and wishes everyone except evil a purifying Labor Day.