Mafiascum.net

In post 3533, Nero Cain wrote:My assumption is that dgb was the intended kill and the bg saved dbg. Would dgbs neighboizor still happen if dgb was killed last night?

oh my god dude get with the fucking program

VC 4.4

Shrek (3) - CheekyTeeky, Dwlee99, Dragon of the West
Gamma Emerald (2) - Shrek, Cat Scratch Fever

Not voting: Almost50, Nero Cain, KittyTacky, Gamma Emerald, ArcAngel9, Roden, DrippingGoofball

With 12 alive it takes 7 to exile.

Day 4 will end in (expired on 2021-08-30 21:30:00) or when an exile is reached.

Dragon of the West is V/LA until Sunday.

ArcAngel9 is V/LA until Monday night.

In post 3551, ArcAngel9 wrote:

MOD - I am V/LA until Monday night

ArcAngel9 is V/LA until Monday night.

In post 3512, KittyTacky wrote:Well no shit? It was half the game ago, my two readslists were close together.

My reads changed quite a bit at this point though.

Please post a readslist.

In post 3550, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3533, Nero Cain wrote:My assumption is that dgb was the intended kill and the bg saved dbg. Would dgbs neighboizor still happen if dgb was killed last night?

oh my god dude get with the fucking program

Y is suggesting that scum tried to kill dbg the other night such an offense?

In post 3517, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 2405, CheekyTeeky wrote:UNVOTE: Perfect, you can either get shot or watch DGB

Oh what's that, you suggested watching and then acted like it was my idea?? What are you doing if you're town cheeky?

I never claimed it was your idea, I'm looking for who pushed the wagon onto Cyrus. I know I said not to go for MegA after the claim but even prior to the claim Nero was calling me dumb for defending Cyrus and telling everyone to vote them.

I think you're both town, if it helps.

@Nero and Gamma

Nero why is Gamma scum in your opinion?

Ok I think the no kill happened for 1 of 2 reasons:
1. I was JK'd and the target.
2. Scum wifom chose to no kill to see which direction today was going to go and give us less info to work with. This lines up with Shrek rescinding his claim because he would have been the logical NK after not rescinding yesterday. So scum killing anyone else would have confirmed him as scum. If scum were blocked from killing it was definitely aimed at me.

Since my role is now redundant, I'll claim. I am a watcher, which doesn't clear Gamma in anyway. N1 noone targeted Gamma, which I thought was where the NK would go if all the pushes on Gamma came from Town. I was trying to decipher Gamma's play after the result and I can see strange associatives with both MegA and Kitty that could indicate a scum!Gamma here. Town would have worked this out on my flip so that could be why I've been kept alive to keep people believing I have an inno on scum!Gamma. I don't think this necessarily clears Nero because his pushes on Gamma haven't really led anywhere.

Nero associatives with MegA are slightly better than Gamma but it's weird that MegA only felt comfortable pushing Nero. I think it's slim chances that both Nero and Gamma are town or Scum but more likely one is scum and it's probably Gamma.

So we had a watcher claim... and you kept the person who claimed it alive another day?

I don't feel like he's hunting. Like yea he's pushing for Shrek but outside of that he's doing what? Maybe lining up for dw. 3507 gave me a kinda busy vibe. Kinda felt like the quick hammer yesterday was scum that wanted to stop the day phase.

I'm also assuming that you don't have an inno

In post 3560, Dwlee99 wrote:So we had a watcher claim... and you kept the person who claimed it alive another day?

Yes it was perfect because DGB had claimed and there was a decent chance they were going to be targeted by scum so I left the watcher alive knowing they were scum to catch more scum. It was genius until my role failed...

In post 3561, Nero Cain wrote:I'm also assuming that you don't have an inno

I do not have an inno on Gamma.

In post 3560, Dwlee99 wrote:So we had a watcher claim... and you kept the person who claimed it alive another day?

!!!!!!!

I could somewhat buy cheeky thinking she's too important to cc but ima look to see if she ever unvotes mega

I am scumreading both Shrek and Cheeky.

In post 3559, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok I think the no kill happened for 1 of 2 reasons:
1. I was JK'd and the target.
2. Scum wifom chose to no kill to see which direction today was going to go and give us less info to work with. This lines up with Shrek rescinding his claim because he would have been the logical NK after not rescinding yesterday. So scum killing anyone else would have confirmed him as scum. If scum were blocked from killing it was definitely aimed at me.

Since my role is now redundant, I'll claim. I am a watcher, which doesn't clear Gamma in anyway. N1 noone targeted Gamma, which I thought was where the NK would go if all the pushes on Gamma came from Town. I was trying to decipher Gamma's play after the result and I can see strange associatives with both MegA and Kitty that could indicate a scum!Gamma here. Town would have worked this out on my flip so that could be why I've been kept alive to keep people believing I have an inno on scum!Gamma. I don't think this necessarily clears Nero because his pushes on Gamma haven't really led anywhere.

Nero associatives with MegA are slightly better than Gamma but it's weird that MegA only felt comfortable pushing Nero. I think it's slim chances that both Nero and Gamma are town or Scum but more likely one is scum and it's probably Gamma.

You thought the N1 NK would be on Gamma in spite of him being the EOD counterwagon to town!T3? Why would scum do that >_> - it would reveal so much info about the Day 1 gamestate. Not to mention removing an easy mislim.

So in my head I was really excited for D3 to start because I had MegA lock scum, plus the NK or RB target. I didn't think about a rolestop, which I guess is still possible and I definitely didn't expect to be directly roleblocked.

In post 3565, Nero Cain wrote:I could somewhat buy cheeky thinking she's too important to cc but ima look to see if she ever unvotes mega

It was nothing about importance. It made sense not to claim and force MegA to provide BS results D3 and have a chance at finding more scum. We just so happened to have Shrek wander into the net when he was targeted by DGB.

Shrek is scum for sure, why on Earth would a town player track me?

There was no reason to track me because my actions would self-resolve from having a witness in the neighbor PT.

As for Cheeky, I don't understand why a player with a sweet role like watcher would fakeclaim mason from Day 1.

In post 3570, DrippingGoofball wrote:Shrek is scum for sure, why on Earth would a town player track me?

I don't know why they claimed anything they did but I think the pressure of being caught by the hood and our pressure for an explanation forced the bad fake claim.

In post 3572, DrippingGoofball wrote:As for Cheeky, I don't understand why a player with a sweet role like watcher would fakeclaim mason from Day 1.

Because I was wifoming scum which worked N1 and may have kept working if I didn't panic when my role failed N2.