Mafiascum.net

skitter > tw > datisi > pooky > raven > dsjstr

don't @ me

In post 3574, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3492, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:messed up quotes there,

my response is:


I am only slumslotting your slot in the event that tw dies in the night and skitter gets a 2nd visit confirmed

This is what is confusing me about your posting. I liked this answer for example

In post 3546, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm just curious btw

if you are scum - is there a chess game in the Scum PT between Koba and Bugspray ?

but then you make this comment. Are you tl me or shading my slot, I really can’t tell.

that's just my normal banter

also why is there an evil smiley face there

In post 3567, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3499, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i meant tw/skitter

Um . . . that’s two?

How do you forget you’re a PR here?

i mean tw/skitter can't be the scumteam because that would mean I am the only PR.

also cuz datisi got a pm from mod that skitter is FN

In post 3576, Something_Smart wrote:skitter > tw > datisi > pooky > raven > dsjstr

don't @ me

You’re kidding right? How do you have me this low and btw you are not locktown, only Skitter is, because that means mech confitown but Dats comes extremely close to that.

In post 3579, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3576, Something_Smart wrote:skitter > tw > datisi > pooky > raven > dsjstr

don't @ me

You’re kidding right? How do you have me this low and btw you are not locktown, only Skitter is, because that means mech confitown but Dats comes extremely close to that.

Why the bolded? @SS?

It's semantics. I use locktown to mean extremely confident town based on reads, as opposed to conftown which means confirmed town based on mechanics.

In post 3580, Raven Branwen wrote:Why the bolded? @SS?

(in case that was a serious question, the answer is because I expected putting Pooky over you to be controversial.)

actually Raven on reread your latest string of posts isn't as bad as I initially thought it was. Stuff like 3569 does rustle my jimmies though.

In post 3578, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 3567, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3499, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i meant tw/skitter

Um . . . that’s two?

How do you forget you’re a PR here?

i mean tw/skitter can't be the scumteam because that would mean I am the only PR.

also cuz datisi got a pm from mod that skitter is FN

Oh sorry then, I misunderstood. Well Skitter is mech locktown and Dats is damned close to that, so I don’t understand why dsjstr is still voting him when he cleared me but I’ll have to wait for him to answer that.

In post 3572, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3548, Something_Smart wrote:I don't have any clue what your alignment is honestly, I keep going back and forth in my head

and

yes my play today makes a lot of sense as locktowned scum

. but that ignores the reasons I got locktowned in the first place.

??? Did you read this before you pressed “send”?

I don't see what's confusing about this, btw. If I'm scum here who got mistakenly universally townread, it's totally reasonable for me to lurk the day out and let town eat itself alive... but that assumes the reasons for me getting universally townread were wrong in the first place, which by definition they were unlikely to be.

my reads are really just [giant mess] > dsjstr

we definitely need dsjstr's flip to make sense of anything

In post 3584, Something_Smart wrote:actually Raven on reread your latest string of posts isn't as bad as I initially thought it was. Stuff like 3569 does rustle my jimmies though.

3585, I misunderstood his post.

fwiw I both think dsjstr's vote on datisi could be distancing and don't buy datisi's argument that he wouldn't have confirmed skitter as scum here

In post 3586, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3572, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3548, Something_Smart wrote:I don't have any clue what your alignment is honestly, I keep going back and forth in my head

and

yes my play today makes a lot of sense as locktowned scum

. but that ignores the reasons I got locktowned in the first place.

??? Did you read this before you pressed “send”?

I don't see what's confusing about this, btw. If I'm scum here who got mistakenly universally townread, it's totally reasonable for me to lurk the day out and let town eat itself alive... but that assumes the reasons for me getting universally townread were wrong in the first place, which by definition they were unlikely to be.

It read like a weird contradiction, which is why I assumed it was some kind of typo or something like that.

In post 3589, Something_Smart wrote:fwiw I both think dsjstr's vote on datisi could be distancing and don't buy datisi's argument that he wouldn't have confirmed skitter as scum here

I don’t know if he would or not but have you read any Dats’ scumgames? He plays very differently as scum from how he’s playing here.

In post 3590, Raven Branwen wrote:It read like a weird contradiction, which is why I assumed it was some kind of typo or something like that.

yeah I guess it was because you were interpreting "locktowned" differently from me. makes sense.

In post 3591, Raven Branwen wrote:have you read any Dats’ scumgames?

I don't believe so

ok super fucking lazy catchup because i have slept like 1.7 hours in the past i don't even know how many

In post 3558, the worst wrote:Let's policy elim datisi for not spamming

i was about to have words

In post 3558, the worst wrote:But I want to be scum with Dats. *pouts*

<3

In post 3576, Something_Smart wrote:skitter > tw > datisi > pooky > raven > dsjstr

don't @ me

@s_s

In post 3589, Something_Smart wrote:fwiw I both think dsjstr's vote on datisi could be distancing and don't buy datisi's argument that he wouldn't have confirmed skitter as scum here

are you genuinely thinking about killing me here? lemme know when i need to start screaming again k thx

In post 3593, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3591, Raven Branwen wrote:have you read any Dats’ scumgames?

I don't believe so

smuggler's port???

ok like nothing that has happened in the past two? pages makes me change my mind on anything

like i see that people want to kill dsjstr and like i'm fine with that because i do think he's scum but i just see pooky lowkey positioning for that and i fear the fate of this town

anyway yes
my brain capacity right now is no
if ya got questions shoot them

In post 3593, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3591, Raven Branwen wrote:have you read any Dats’ scumgames?

I don't believe so

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=32624

Here’s a very recent one. He lacks the conviction I’m seeing here and many of his posts are fluff.

In post 3558, the worst wrote:Let's policy elim datisi for not spamming

In post 3568, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3503, skitter30 wrote:

In post 3479, the worst wrote:

In post 3463, skitter30 wrote:im scum with u dats, don'tcha know?

Can you two recruit me?

on it

Bu I want to be scum with Dats. *pouts*

In post 3576, Something_Smart wrote:skitter > tw > datisi > pooky > raven > dsjstr

don't @ me

In post 3589, Something_Smart wrote:fwiw I both think dsjstr's vote on datisi could be distancing and don't buy datisi's argument that he wouldn't have confirmed skitter as scum here

In post 3593, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3591, Raven Branwen wrote:have you read any Dats’ scumgames?

I don't believe so

raven, s_s PLAYED in that game. which is why i'm finding this funny

In post 3568, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3503, skitter30 wrote:

In post 3479, the worst wrote:

In post 3463, skitter30 wrote:im scum with u dats, don'tcha know?

Can you two recruit me?

on it

Bu I want to be scum with Dats. *pouts*

@Dats, I said that not duckling.

In post 3594, Datisi wrote:smuggler's port???

I played in smuggler's port but that does not mean that I read it

why are those quotes there what the

whatever

pedit: oh.