Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2021 12:38 pm
that is literally not what i am doingIn post 3566, Taly wrote:oh, I'm getting BoP'd on my few scum games. Love it.
i just realized i cannot give you the easy surface level clear. that's all
that is literally not what i am doingIn post 3566, Taly wrote:oh, I'm getting BoP'd on my few scum games. Love it.
Understood.petapan wrote:that is literally not what i am doingIn post 3566, Taly wrote:oh, I'm getting BoP'd on my few scum games. Love it.
i just realized i cannot give you the easy surface level clear. that's all
In post 3359, Morning Tweet wrote:The illustrious gameshow host returns to center stage to make an announcement.
"Everyone! Team Blue has locked in their judgement. The show will be resuming very, very soon! Don't leave your seats, you aren't going to want to miss this!"
Can't wait.
basis of my defense of you as no real reason for you to basically choose dunnstral to be in duel then push end of day even if you progression on dunnstral wasn't exactly transparentIn post 3577, petapan wrote:did anyone in the other thread do analysis on the wagon movement at the end of phase 2, since that seems to have been a point of interest for at least some of you
and like, additional votes on dunnstral don't count as much once day was being pushed to end just the ones up until he'd be second duelistIn post 3579, ulyana wrote:basis of my defense of you as no real reason for you to basically choose dunnstral to be in duel then push end of day even if you progression on dunnstral wasn't exactly transparentIn post 3577, petapan wrote:did anyone in the other thread do analysis on the wagon movement at the end of phase 2, since that seems to have been a point of interest for at least some of you
i feel seenIn post 3579, ulyana wrote:basis of my defense of you as no real reason for you to basically choose dunnstral to be in duel then push end of day even if you progression on dunnstral wasn't exactly transparentIn post 3577, petapan wrote:did anyone in the other thread do analysis on the wagon movement at the end of phase 2, since that seems to have been a point of interest for at least some of you
That's a, uh, outlandish theoryIn post 3561, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like it’s possible 2 scum were in the pink room and since the wagon was landing on Infinity, who is sussing Saber, the scum in the pink room just wanted an opponent that wouldn’t get votes over infinity.
In post 3563, Gammagooey wrote:Why would scum need to? Scum working together or seeming like they're working together in the PT seems actively bad and if there are two scum in Pink that means they only have to not nom a single person in blue team. and if all 3 scum were in pink obv they don't have to give a shit about the nom at all.
I mean it was not at all easy to make u the nom, i'm not really sure what yoj're trying to say with ur first pointIn post 3564, petapan wrote:i think it goes without saying that in a world where i have 2 teammate in pink thread i am not where i am. i would go so far as to argue it doesn't happen if i have even if i have one there given how incoherent it seems to have been
but then, the theory that pink is clean is pretty ridiculous too because it would suggest that i went all in hardcore powerwolfing for the sake of...making my teammate the second wagon in the even anyway, after spending a good chunk of time defending him. it makes no sense as any kind of rational scum play on my part.
Not a good reaction to that ...In post 3566, Taly wrote:oh, I'm getting BoP'd on my few scum games. Love it.
Very much disliked the timing of ur dunn suspicionIn post 3581, petapan wrote:i feel seenIn post 3579, ulyana wrote:basis of my defense of you as no real reason for you to basically choose dunnstral to be in duel then push end of day even if you progression on dunnstral wasn't exactly transparentIn post 3577, petapan wrote:did anyone in the other thread do analysis on the wagon movement at the end of phase 2, since that seems to have been a point of interest for at least some of you
thank you
fwiw, re: my progression on dunn, i went to review his scum games, including Isekai mafia, which at the time was still in progress. i then checked back here and realized that while his posts had seemed fine to me in the moment, the body of work wasn't great and he had done something that was incredibly scummy for him and made me change my mind. i didn't feel it was necessary to burn the tell (it's deeper than just inactivity, he lurks as either alignment and it was why i was so hesitant to vote him for a long time), so i didn't explain it, and at any rate anything after his flip would be post hoc justification that wouldn't be hard to fake as scum. but that was my thinking at the time
i literally do not let myself get put up with a 2 vote wagon, that's the damn point. i'd be micromanaging the absolute hell out of my teammate in that topic. i. would. not. allow. you. to. nominate. me.In post 3585, skitter30 wrote:I mean it was not at all easy to make u the nom, i'm not really sure what yoj're trying to say with ur first pointIn post 3564, petapan wrote:i think it goes without saying that in a world where i have 2 teammate in pink thread i am not where i am. i would go so far as to argue it doesn't happen if i have even if i have one there given how incoherent it seems to have been
but then, the theory that pink is clean is pretty ridiculous too because it would suggest that i went all in hardcore powerwolfing for the sake of...making my teammate the second wagon in the even anyway, after spending a good chunk of time defending him. it makes no sense as any kind of rational scum play on my part.
And yeah i dont think the pink room is entirely empty either, like i said earlier i think there's 1
okay greatIn post 3588, skitter30 wrote:And how it came on the heels of pushing cakez and dropping it shortly thereafter
fwiw i don't hate this method but it's worth understanding that with a player as inactive as Dunn it's going to lead to a fair deal of false positives, and i don't think he's a total chump who doesn't know how to distance or whateverIn post 3590, Toogeloo wrote:My analysis was based on Dunn's name dropping tendencies, which I felt Dunn is the type of scum player who actively ignores his buddies if he can. What I drew from his iso is how he never once mentions Saber ever, not even in a quote, and peta and Ydrasse only get a couple mentions at all. I figured there was some possibility of scum in one of those.
imagine me rolling my eyes at you extremely hardIn post 3595, Gamma Emerald wrote:Immediately after losing a member? I don’t think so.