My core point was to point out my opinion of the anti-town nature of you harping on no counterclaim as evidence of anything.In post 3599, Ausuka wrote:Then he's dead if he's not the real killer, and we don't need to lynch him anyway? I don't get your point here.
My secondary point is more conceptual - insomuch as I do see value in a lynch regardless, especially since it is preferable to lynch a scum than to lynch a town even if a scum will be shot after the town lynch.
I have explained (ad naseum) a scum case on him - at least pretend to be aware of it when you straw man my case into being 'he's anti-town'.In post 3599, Ausuka wrote:I'm taking that as meaning that he's not hardclaiming his other abilities, which is reasonable since no CC or kill means he's conftown here without having to reveal to the mafia anything else he can do.
Like I get if he's town his play has been very weak but I don't think that's a reason to lynch him here.
So you think he has hardclaimed the kill?
Because I don't see that - where do you?