Mafiascum.net

In post 3004, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Why do you hate being scum? I love being scum.

In post 2986, NoPowerOverMe wrote:The amount of non conversation is staggering. Present a new case or get on board with the old one.

These

In post 3599, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 3584, unwnd wrote:I was getting tunnel vision on the gamestate and I apologize. I hope you can see though that Gamma fanning the flames of our argument was scum as fuck regardless

DGB, 100%

You haven't seen the role card, how can you be certain?

Cause Umlu was a VT and was neighborized by the same process as Vax

Scum neighborizers are popular.

My new thought is

NPOM/Insano/Glitch/(Gamma)

Seriously I looked at NPOM and it's a barren fucking wasteland

Wait no ABR has to fit there too

God fucking hell

In post 2695, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Mod pls replace my scumbuddies ive been so lonely in mafia chat.

Also could be construed as “taunting”

In post 3605, innocentvillager wrote:

In post 2695, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Mod pls replace my scumbuddies ive been so lonely in mafia chat.

Also could be construed as “taunting”

Yes

Would Gamma do what he did with us earlier as town DGB?

I think I'd rather vote Glitch today if we're voting outside of PRs, because then at least we resolve that 1v1. the neapolitan can target VT claims and confirm or guilty them, DGB rolestops him tonight so he's guaranteed to get at least 2 checks in starbuck/nopower/gamma and that wins the game, probably.

Insano, you're very sensible when you post but I worry about your activity/other gut pings. Give me a stream of consciousness when it comes to how you feel about this thread and why you've sorta avoided it

can we just call unwnd/me/dgb/vax a townblock

glitch as scum

And we need to find the 3 scum in

Gamma
ABR
NPOM
Insanoflex
TGP
Starbuck

(in rough order of activity)

I'm still suuuper skeptical of the claims all being real, but if we keep them alive they have to keep giving reports.

Also, I really think ABR is scummy so I'm just sitting here lost in all these fucking claims, so the NO GUN result just fucks with my brain further

In post 3607, unwnd wrote:Would Gamma do what he did with us earlier as town DGB?

.

In a 2 vs 1

You support the side with 2

Like isanoflex did. He sided with the 2

i was in a clutch situation like this before where town is pressed against the edge of a rope. The best thing we can do is assume a reasonably ok townbloc, try to avoid being consumed by paranoia, and work together as a team to solve it

Can normals have indies?

In post 3608, Insanoflex wrote:I think I'd rather vote Glitch today if we're voting outside of PRs, because then at least we resolve that 1v1. the neapolitan can target VT claims and confirm or guilty them, DGB rolestops him tonight so he's guaranteed to get at least 2 checks in starbuck/nopower/gamma and that wins the game, probably.

you really think it’s that easy? 6 townies have died and we massclaim and we just get some confirmations and win it?

I can’t tell how I feel about this

Where is TGP

normals can have a SK. But there probably isn’t one with one death per day, I’m feeling 4 scum or 3 scum one traitor or something weird like that

Is 4 scum 1 traitor possible with all this town power? Idk

I am still concerned with the napolitan stuff, we need to consider than 8ne coul be scum, or that goons are recrutable.

In post 1615, NoPowerOverMe wrote:My guess on a setup is 11/5/1

This guy has been dropping TMI this whole game and I just am now seeing it

glitch’s interactions with ABR are certainly weird. ABR expresses him in his elim pool but never votes him.

Idk if it’s necessarily partnery (definitely could be? it’s a little like, too theatrical every time he mentions him) but it is weird and worth looking into.

And if ABR scum, insanoflex is probably just scum

ABR/taylor interactions don’t look incredible either

In post 3609, unwnd wrote:Insano, you're very sensible when you post but I worry about your activity/other gut pings. Give me a stream of consciousness when it comes to how you feel about this thread and why you've sorta avoided it

I don't know, I think I've just not gotten into the flow of the game? I think I got in over my head joining a game of this size for my first game here and haven't adapted well. I'mnot really used to the post you guys have been posting at, I used to play a long time ago and I'd just post a couple of times per day. I've been busy with IRL stuff and have a bad habit of procrastinating so I've been avoiding the game when I should be posting in it. It was also kind of dead before you/vax showed up and everyone started posting. It was also really hard to get reads off the game having to take in so much at once and with so many people it was impossible to get anything off of.

Certainly you have a bit of reads even if they're maintained by gut or what have you. I've given up my nicer presentation of the previous days to just hash things out even if it isn't pretty. If you're town I'd love to see a bit of just letting loose

In post 3616, innocentvillager wrote:

In post 3608, Insanoflex wrote:I think I'd rather vote Glitch today if we're voting outside of PRs, because then at least we resolve that 1v1. the neapolitan can target VT claims and confirm or guilty them, DGB rolestops him tonight so he's guaranteed to get at least 2 checks in starbuck/nopower/gamma and that wins the game, probably.

you really think it’s that easy? 6 townies have died and we massclaim and we just get some confirmations and win it?

I can’t tell how I feel about this

I don't think it's easy but...if they have to keep giving investigations on the unconfirmed pool, it's guaranteed to narrow things down, right?