Mafiascum.net

I honestly forget what my fucking reads are because ive been spending like 5 RL days now explaining that DGB is bullshitting her claim that she knows im lying.

i need to do work on this game because we need to find someone we can lynch and simultaneously confirm my double vote.

↑ Magua wrote:

@Mod(s):

Kindly answer the question asked of you in this post.

↑ Sir Elton Hercules John wrote:

↑ Magua wrote:

@Mod(s):

Kindly answer the question asked of you in this post.

N

o

,

t

h

e

r

e

w

a

s

n

o

m

o

d

e

r

r

o

r

i

n

t

h

a

t

v

o

t

e

c

o

u

n

t

.

Oh trollie?

yes?

Hi.

I am willing to be the compromise lynch today on the condition we don't lynch zoraster, who I have a very strong townread on.

VOTE: zoidberg

... You havent been paying attention

Zoidberg's alias was well-chosen.

↑ dramonic wrote:

↑ Sir Elton Hercules John wrote:

↑ Magua wrote:

@Mod(s):

Kindly answer the question asked of you in this post.

N

o

,

t

h

e

r

e

w

a

s

n

o

m

o

d

e

r

r

o

r

i

n

t

h

a

t

v

o

t

e

c

o

u

n

t

.

Oh trollie?

Yoooo hooooooo

Dbg these people make me want to cry.
Hold me?

*HUGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ*

im confused as to what u want from me

↑ dramonic wrote:... You havent been paying attention

↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:Zoidberg's alias was well-chosen.

↑ dramonic wrote:Dbg these people make me want to cry.
Hold me?

Lynch me, then. I don't want to be the one to fuck this up in lylo.

Zoidberg, are you a hated townie? If not, shut it.

---

↑ dramonic wrote:At this point I'm almost inclined to say that there are actually two mafia members left, I don't think magua can really be this retarded without an ulterior motive

Sadly, I do think you can be this retarded without an ulterior motive.

My god, snippy posts are fun.

↑ zoraster wrote:so this is a question: why even bother try for vollkan today, Magua? As best I can tell you don't have a 100% scum read on him (just heavily suspect him), and even if he's scum you'll need to lynch me next (or else have a sure read on someone else). is it just that you think you're dying tonight?

I suspect him more than 80%, and so am willing to lynch him, yes. It's more that I simply do not see a game where vollkan is town.

A vollkan-scum-lynch today would make this 6:1, NK would make it 5:1, so lynching you would not be an automatic move because you couldn't be instalynched in a four player mylo.

---

So with the mod response, I went back and checked the vote counts, and yes, Trollie's vote was counting as 2 in the VCs.

Post #2876, with 16 votes (4+5+7) in play (Trollie is voting DGB)
Post #2927, with 15 votes (4+3+8) in play (Trollie is not voting)
Post #3000, with 16 votes (3+3+3+7) in play (Trollie is voting Wyrd)
Post #3050, with 15 votes (3+1+1+3+7) in play (Trollie is not voting)

Yet this is not the case D5, when Trollie has claimed to take vollkan's vote, as can be seen in #3250.

Kindly vote for someone nao pl0x. I don't care who.

Also , kindly explain your belief as to why your vote showed as 2 votes on the VCs D4, but not D1 or D5.

↑ Magua wrote:Also

@Trollie

, kindly explain your belief as to why your vote showed as 2 votes on the VCs D4, but not D1 or D5.

D1 i did not have 2 votes

D5 i think the mod correctly did not divulge my double vote.

Your reasoning for lynching zora is relatively sound, yet you're dismissing it to chase a phantasm, I dunno what you want me to call that. You're basically providing reasons to not do what you're doing

Okay the way I see it, the only other viable lynch seems to be Zora at this point. I wouldn't have placed Zora among the remaining scum. If I don't get lynched today, it just means I get lynched tomorrow, which is far worse. It infuriates me that I have nothing to contribute, but I'm trying to be realistic about this. I've stuffed up, but that's the best way to salvage it.

My parting word would be that something about DGB's play this game has bothered me (I think that was partly behind my points earlier), but I can't work out what.

↑ Magua wrote:Also

@Trollie

, kindly explain your belief as to why your vote showed as 2 votes on the VCs D4, but not D1 or D5.

The Mod says the votecounts are CORRECT, right?

Looks like Trollie's vote how shows up twice here (D4), too:

↑ Sir Elton Hercules John wrote:

Votecount 5.2

T

h

e

M

i

n

i

-

L

i

b

r

a

r

i

a

n

-

0

I

e

c

e

r

i

n

t

-

0

z

o

r

a

s

t

e

r

-

0

S

l

u

m

b

e

r

p

a

r

t

y

b

o

i

s

-

0

d

r

a

m

o

n

i

c

-

0

Z

o

i

d

b

e

r

g

-

0

v

o

l

l

k

a

n

-

0

K

a

w

a

i

i

-

3

(

D

G

B

,

T

h

e

T

r

o

l

l

i

e

)

M

a

g

u

a

-

0

T

h

e

T

r

o

l

l

i

e

-

0

D

r

i

p

p

i

n

g

G

o

o

f

b

a

l

l

-

3

(

K

a

w

a

i

i

,

S

l

u

m

b

e

r

P

a

r

t

y

B

o

i

s

,

M

i

n

i

-

L

i

b

r

a

r

i

a

n

)

N

o

t

V

o

t

i

n

g

-

6

(

I

e

c

e

r

i

n

t

,

z

o

r

a

s

t

e

r

,

d

r

a

m

o

n

i

c

,

Z

o

i

d

b

e

r

g

,

v

o

l

l

k

a

n

,

M

a

g

u

a

)

1

1

a

l

i

v

e

.

T

a

k

e

s

6

t

o

l

y

n

c

h

EBWOP: D5

Yeah, ok so when i asked about my vote not being public, that PM went directly to Reck, meaning that UT probably counted my Double Vote and Reck didnt, explaining the differences in VCs

I don't understand. If you don't send a PM, then your vote remains public? Is the publicness of your vote something you can choose?

k.

So, first.

Now.

Between vollkan, zoraster, and Trollie, having not voted for a collective 72 days and somehow stunningly having a total of zero collective scumreads, I'm officially sad, because there's no possibility where they are all scum.

Then there's "Want a lynch? Why not" Zoidberg.

And so that's half the game that I simply cannot respect as mafia players.

---

So, we have 36 or so hours to deadline.

With Trollie's double vote now confirmed, absolutely against lynching Trollie. dramonic can rail all he wants, but a double-voter in lylo is bad news bears for the scum and should be a top NK priority and I see no reason to help them with that. Furthermore, Trollie *steals* a vote, so even if scum let him live until D7, even if they kill him N7, they're taking a 50% chance that he'll steal their vote which will also cause them to lose. In addition to having another chance to crosskill. Etc. Etc.

Still want to lynch vollkan. dramonic says I'm chasing phantoms, which is lulz because I feel that dramonic is doing the exact same thing with Trollie, except Trollie will be NK'ed and vollkan never will.

At this point, my two suspects are vollkan and Iecerint, though I still want to go back and see if I think Iecerint fits as Mafia or just SK. Iecerint is just pinging for hanging back, commenting on mostly factual things (eg, Trollie's vote), and neither pushing his suspects or trying to engage people about theirs, but, eh, suspect was Trollie, so meh. Not certain enough on Iecerint to want to vote him today.

So it's still vollkan > zoraster for me.

*Really* curious about Iecerint's thoughts about lynching Trollie now that the double vote is confirmed.

↑ vollkan wrote:If I don't get lynched today, it just means I get lynched tomorrow, which is far worse.

Unless I'm not seeing something here, the only people willing to lynch you are trollie and magua. I think(?) DGB was only voting you for trollie test purpose.