Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:16 am
how would hypothetical mollie-scum have handled the flandre lynch, given s/he was basically 100% going to be lynched at that point?
Page 146 of 158
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:32 am
Gonna post today in the afternoon
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:36 pm
You've said before that you don't like to bus your partners when you're Scum, but Nacho made a very interesting observation in the QT last night: you didn't actuallyIn post 3623, pirate mollie wrote:mebbe you look up how I feel about bussing and how I got into a postgame spat with regfan over it. I will try to link it later. sometimes you have to bus but you don't do it in stupid ways.
bus
Flandre -- all you did was hammer him. You didn't actively push for his removal from the game, which is kind of what bussing is.The first time you even acknowledge Flandre's existence is 1282, where you state your intention to hammer him. In 1283 you avoid giving a firm opinion of him but say that you're okay with lynching him anyway. Still no strong opinion of him in 1400. You say in 1419 that you asked for a claim from Flandre (even though you never did -- at least, not in this thread, if you catch my drift), and then you hammer him in 1543. That is the full extent of your interactions with Flandre. Do you think that qualifies as "bussing"? Because I sure don't.
Also, I agree with Muffin. You don't really think that hammering obvious-Scum Flandre is bussing in a "stupid way," do you?
And yet, you didn't seem to have a problem talking to fferyllt on Night 4 or Night 5. Also, you had six friggin' nights to talk to Nacho in the neighborhood, so don't act like he was killed before you had a chance to have a substantial conversation with him.In post 3623, pirate mollie wrote:I WISH I had more time to talk to nacho and I find it pretty FUCKING convenient that he was nked before I had a chance to more fully talk to him he was trying to sort me outfor ferybecause fery was getting paranoid about we but we have an implicit understanding that we go through other people to deal with other so that it doesn't shit up the game. that is what nacho was doing, I guarantee it, cos that is what he has done for me. <--- you probably don't understand this but there a lot of people who do cos they have seen the fireworks.
"Zero reevaluation"? Really? I was wondering before whether you've been paying attention. Guess this answers my question.In post 3623, pirate mollie wrote:I don't like how skull is doing zero reevaluation after the venny lynch and is throwing suspicion my way when I am so *popular*. I still think it is muffina.
Am I scummy for being suspicious of you? Is Pidgey equally scummy for "throwing suspicion" at you as well? Is it inconceivable for a Town player to be suspicious of you at this point in the game?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:01 pm
ftr, i went over this before when i talked about mollie's lack of stances / reads on anyone or anything in this game - she tried to counter this by suggesting she did have strong stances on people (e.g. flandre), i pretty much quoted everything she said about flandre to prove her wrong, and she kinda went silent about it after that.skull wrote:The first time you even acknowledge Flandre's existence is 1282, where you state your intention to hammer him. In 1283 you avoid giving a firm opinion of him but say that you're okay with lynching him anyway. Still no strong opinion of him in 1400. You say in 1419 that you asked for a claim from Flandre (even though you never did -- at least, not in this thread, if you catch my drift), and then you hammer him in 1543. That is the full extent of your interactions with Flandre. Do you think that qualifies as "bussing"? Because I sure don't.
Spoiler:
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:06 pm
well, six night and day phases isn't a lot of time and those evil scumbutts were obviously plotting against mollie by taking out sangres N6 so she couldn't have a back-and-forth with nacho!skull wrote:Also, you had six friggin' nights to talk to Nacho in the neighborhood, so don't act like he was killed before you had a chance to have a substantial conversation with him.
it's also rather hilarious that what she said about how "convenient" it was that nacho was killed implies that scum have access to your QT or something, which implies that if she thinks i'm scum she must think there's another scum in your QT or something? or i dunno. getting upset about that is rather odd.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:33 pm
If Muffin seriously doesn't understand why it is scummy to selectively quote to make it seem like the poster is willfully ignoring important aspects of the situation, he should probably play a different game.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:36 pm
if iecerint can't read and doesn't understand that isn't what happened, he'd probably be dead if breathing weren't an automatic function that any idiot could do
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:38 pm
Are you saying that you don't understand why it is scummy to quote people out of context to imply that they didn't say things that they did?
Or are you saying that you do not understand why town should not be scummy?
Are just kind of embarrassed for skimming my post and being called out about it?
Or are you just scum?
Or are you saying that you do not understand why town should not be scummy?
Are just kind of embarrassed for skimming my post and being called out about it?
Or are you just scum?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:46 pm
here, i'll walk you through it in baby steps so even you can understand it
you said that if all three of {you, AD, sangres} were town, scum could kill any of you interchangeably
i said no, that's not the case, because it was only really sangres who was confirmed town - nowhere did i suggest that all three of you weren't town, just that prior to last night, sangres was the only real conftown - i tacked onto this that i, personally, would have killed sangres over the other two even if it was interchangeable, because you suggested that as a
you then got upset and suggested i didn't know what you meant and complained about me deleting part of your quote
i loled
but here's the thing, your ENTIRE POST WAS POINTLESS because it MEANS NOTHING AT ALL IN REGARDS TO THE GAME and you're getting upset that i didn't quote a portion of it when i didn't respond
AH DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
literally surprised you're able to post on here when you're typically the kind of person i would think has more fun playing in traffic
you said that if all three of {you, AD, sangres} were town, scum could kill any of you interchangeably
i said no, that's not the case, because it was only really sangres who was confirmed town - nowhere did i suggest that all three of you weren't town, just that prior to last night, sangres was the only real conftown - i tacked onto this that i, personally, would have killed sangres over the other two even if it was interchangeable, because you suggested that as a
possibility
and i was reinforcing thisyou then got upset and suggested i didn't know what you meant and complained about me deleting part of your quote
i loled
but here's the thing, your ENTIRE POST WAS POINTLESS because it MEANS NOTHING AT ALL IN REGARDS TO THE GAME and you're getting upset that i didn't quote a portion of it when i didn't respond
AH DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
literally surprised you're able to post on here when you're typically the kind of person i would think has more fun playing in traffic
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:48 pm
like i read your entire post, your entire post was empty speculation, i was telling you my thought process in regards to it, the fact that you don't understand this means you were probably slapped on the head one too many times as a kid
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:52 pm
It's interesting that you read my post, thought it was "empty speculation," and then regurgitated the exact same content while pretending that it was your original invention. 
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:53 pm
notice the usage of the word "i" after "also"
it implies what i would have done, not what others necessarily would have done
now how about you shut the fuck up and post something worth reading instead of using this as an excuse to pretend you're posting content
coz if mollie flipping scum doesn't end the game, i'm power-lynching the fuck out of you tomorrow
it implies what i would have done, not what others necessarily would have done
now how about you shut the fuck up and post something worth reading instead of using this as an excuse to pretend you're posting content
coz if mollie flipping scum doesn't end the game, i'm power-lynching the fuck out of you tomorrow
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:54 pm
Vote: Muffin
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:55 pm
like, you cannot be this fucking dumb
i literally explained why the whole premise of the post was flawed then explained why i would have killed sangres anyway even if it WEREN'T flawed
i literally explained why the whole premise of the post was flawed then explained why i would have killed sangres anyway even if it WEREN'T flawed
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:55 pm
Please don't make me spend any more days with this person. Especially not lylo.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:56 pm
why aren't you commenting on anything in regards to mollie (or anything actually relevant to the game)?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:57 pm
I probably would have wanted to lynch either mollie or mastin today if you hadn't decided to be a dick.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:57 pm
But I've already indicated multiple times that I'm sheeping AP on mollie. Maybe you should read my useless posts more?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:58 pm
*clap* *clap*
you're a pretty good player
you're a pretty good player
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:59 pm
In post 3619, zMuffinMan wrote:like, how stupid can you be, to think that something like 3587 is any better a contribution than not posting at all? or that anything you've said in this game is worth shit when you're not reading and your reads are borrowed from dead people. *clap* *clap*
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:59 pm
no wait, i'm the one not reading
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:01 pm
Let's please kill him before we have to kill him in lylo.
Maybe it will affect how he plays games in the future.
Maybe it will affect how he plays games in the future.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:02 pm
it won't
because i'm right
and you're a VI
because i'm right
and you're a VI
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:03 pm
isn't it going to be hilarious when mollie flips scum and we see just how bad you actually are at mafia?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:03 pm
I am not going to spend 24 hours of my life reading 130 pages. I've done it before; it's not happening in this game.
It is not my job to explain the game to you. It is your job to explain the game to me, to the extent that you think I do not have all the necessary pieces of the puzzle. This is doubly obvious when the objective probability of my being town-aligned is extremely high, and triply so when my relative ignorance about the content in the game makes me more likely to survive slightly longer.
Antagonizing me as you are doing does not make sense to me as a tactic regardless of your alignment.
It is not my job to explain the game to you. It is your job to explain the game to me, to the extent that you think I do not have all the necessary pieces of the puzzle. This is doubly obvious when the objective probability of my being town-aligned is extremely high, and triply so when my relative ignorance about the content in the game makes me more likely to survive slightly longer.
Antagonizing me as you are doing does not make sense to me as a tactic regardless of your alignment.