Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:56 am
the progression of that titus read doesn't make sense.
I said caught-up posts, not the catchup ones. The infinite catching up was somewhat scummy to me, but now that he is up to date I have liked his recent posts.In post 3643, Nahdia wrote:i dont know why shaz liked egg's catchup posts but i'll jsut say that i agree with shaz on them bc i'm too lazy to come up with a reason i like them.
You have no wisdom, the only people with insight are scum. Well maybe you do have some insight.In post 3648, Nahdia wrote:you dare question my infinite wisdom??Titus wrote:Can you add egg and Cy and Magna for awhile?
I really want Shotty dead but the info gained...
PM I'm willing to consider as misled town. Other than that, no one is pushing the wagon. When you look at the votes, like 3 of them are on the same page. Zakk was probably bored, cy doesn't really even exist, and lowell, doesn't have the greatest skill in reading me. Liger is just scum.In post 3641, Shaziro wrote:Nos, if your lynch is a mislynch, who do you think is pushing it/being opportunistic about it? (I realize this is assuming he is town, I'm giving a hypothetical.)
ehIn post 3654, Ircher wrote:Shotty thoughts @Nos?
Asking Nos his thoughts on you.
Wow your sentence structuring and grammar needs work.
Can you pls stop with the insults; thanks.In post 3657, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Wow your sentence structuring and grammar needs work.
after titus's Neapolitan claim + Shaz incident no reasonable person would still want to lynch titus. Even zakk, who has wanted to lynch Titus since D1 acknowledges that she's not the lynch for today. This plus attempting to tie ircher with Titus over something that is completely unreasonable is practically a scum claim.In post 3654, Ircher wrote:Shotty thoughts @Nos?
Dumb =\= scumIn post 3640, Nahdia wrote:this is dumb.In post 3639, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Stop it with your chainsaw defense! Also my question wasn't answered. I asked Titus something about Titus and Titus said something about someone who was not Titus. Then I ask again and Ircher tells me to look at Titus's thing about not Titus in regards to my question about Titus.In post 3634, Ircher wrote:Shotty, read the thread.
I'm still feeling really good about an Ircher/Titus scum team.
VOTE: shotty
this is a red herring. You were talking about transparent and scummy wagons. Not accuracy. Of course you are going to say your wagon isn't accurate.In post 3667, Titus wrote:Speed or longevity have no relation to accuracy
this is a red herring. You were talking about transparent and scummy wagons. Not accuracy. Of course you are going to say your wagon isn't accurate.In post 3667, Titus wrote:Speed or longevity have no relation to accuracy
People have been trying to (and have been) wagoning me since D1 where you started it all. Doesn't mean it's accurate, and each resurgence is probably a scum-driven resurgence.In post 3673, drmyshottyizsik wrote:this is a red herring. You were talking about transparent and scummy wagons. Not accuracy. Of course you are going to say your wagon isn't accurate.In post 3667, Titus wrote:Speed or longevity have no relation to accuracy