Mafiascum.net

Thats part of the reason I wanted to claim it

In post 3647, WhemeStar wrote:My results come in the form of visions

So you did know ahead of time that your results were going to be weird and not straightforward.

Meh, it's probably a flavor thing then. Possibly you'll have to use it several times to see if there's a pattern.

Yeah I think claiming it was the right call

In post 3648, WhemeStar wrote:The thing that gets me about my role pm is the may part which is like are all my results a 50/50 on if something happened or not

Have you tried to clarify what "may" means with unwnd?

In post 3643, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3626, Guillotina wrote:I don't believe town saps SP from someone on N0 without considering that the target may be a protective/cop that will need the SP later to perform their action. I'm a wild card, a loose cannon and even I wouldn't do any N0 actions as town, the fact that you claim that you did looked questionable to me.
And then, your "Conflict Words" claim, you said that you could self target and then you backtracked... I don't trust you.

For sure, it might be anti-town to steal SP from someone... but it seems weird to say that you shouldn't steal SP because then a cop

might

not be able to use their power, when you know that if you don't, a cop

definitely

won't be able to use their power.

All things considered, I feel pretty good about Artemiana.

Why is it weird to say that? You are missing the point. You can't just steal someone else's SP like that without any reference or info, it's just bad play.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't feel good about Arte. The fact that she lied about being able to self target and then say that she cannot self target after someone else pointed out that self targeting was not possible, makes me not trust her and I'm ok with a yeet between her and Titus. I'm not trusting Morph either, like how can they look at all that fuckery and say that Titus and Artemiana are both town?

In post 3653, morph the cat wrote:

In post 3648, WhemeStar wrote:The thing that gets me about my role pm is the may part which is like are all my results a 50/50 on if something happened or not

Have you tried to clarify what "may" means with unwnd?

When that got brought up he responded with that he would not lie to me

In post 3617, Artemiana wrote:WELL WILL YOU LOOK AT THAT

ITS A LION

A LION THAT DEFINTELY IS NOT ME

Morph, Bingle, Shea, LLD, Bell, Guillo

If each of you had my rolecard how would each of you use tonight

Sounds fun.
I'd probably target Murdercat and NDMath.
I'm not entirely sure why you didn't just take two of your strongest scum reads and isolate where they were both clear or not. But I don't think you're scum and I don't think you're lying, so I'll leave it alone with a (?) for post game.

I'd probably Sap Murdercat.
Well, this was a good use of my time as I have a slow meltdown from guilt and so on.

In post 3654, Guillotina wrote:Why is it weird to say that? You are missing the point. You can't just steal someone else's SP like that without any reference or info, it's just bad play.

I mean she had to do it for her cop power to work... and that's a pretty freaking strong power.

The wheme dream thing,
Sigmund was not targeted by anyone and he tried to protect someone and missed.
I have an associates in dream interpretation (this is a lie) so you can trust me.

In post 3630, WhemeStar wrote:Okay so my innate ability allows me to see stuff that may have happened to my target.

I target sigmund last night

I got - Alone but troubled. The scenery is filled with clouds. He tries his best, but his best was not needed.

ANYONE WANNA HELP TELL ME WTF THIS MEANS

I would assume (and believing in his doctor claim) that he was roleblocked.

Tbh, that's not cryptic enough and seems like an OP ability.

I would have liked the power to have been used more effectively than comparing to the not_mafia doppelganger, but I'm pretty ok with losing SP for an N1 Cop action.

~spay

(probably won't see much of Cabd for the next 18 hours or so)

That said, I will never, ever, ever, ever, ever eliminate someone for having a seemingly OP role. Stung once, twice shy.

In post 3658, Bell wrote:The wheme dream thing,
Sigmund was not targeted by anyone and he tried to protect someone and missed.
I have an associates in dream interpretation (this is a lie) so you can trust me.

We targeted Sigmund and were told we were successful.

In post 3657, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3654, Guillotina wrote:Why is it weird to say that? You are missing the point. You can't just steal someone else's SP like that without any reference or info, it's just bad play.

I mean she had to do it for her cop power to work... and that's a pretty freaking strong power.

Yo! Do you read my posts when you reply to me? What part of "She claimed she could self target and later back tracked on it saying that she didn't" you didn't understand. I don't believe her claim after she getting caught in a lie. Let me speak plainly, I don't think she is who she says she is and I think if the sap is true, that she did for shady reasons.

*sigh*
Gunna go to bed and then to work.

Good night. I still feel fairly comfortable murdering Titus.

Pedit: That's cool Morph.

<3

In post 3662, Bell wrote:That said, I will never, ever, ever, ever, ever eliminate someone for having a seemingly OP role. Stung once, twice shy.

really? because I had to sit through people in this game going "oh, someone claimed loyal mailman after a traffic analyst and two protective roles, that seems perfectly believable and not at all suspicious"

In post 3658, Bell wrote:The wheme dream thing,
Sigmund was not targeted by anyone and he tried to protect someone and missed.
I have an associates in dream interpretation (this is a lie) so you can trust me.

I asked just to be sure if its only stuff that happens to my target and not what my target did and unwnd said yes

I mean obviously

When there has been enough talk about what's happened and everything

Pedit: to eliminating titus

In post 3664, Guillotina wrote:Yo! Do you read my posts when you reply to me? What part of "She claimed she could self target and later back tracked on it saying that she didn't" you didn't understand. I don't believe her claim after she getting caught in a lie. Let me speak plainly, I don't think she is who she says she is and I think if the sap is true, that she did for shady reasons.

I mean, that is a completely different matter.

It's much more reasonable to be suspicious of her for that. I feel like the way she claimed the debuff outweighs the chance that she legitimately bungled a fakeclaim (imo it's more likely that she made a genuine error which could happen as either alignment), but I can see where you're coming from at least.

In post 3658, Bell wrote:The wheme dream thing,
Sigmund was not targeted by anyone and he tried to protect someone and missed.
I have an associates in dream interpretation (this is a lie) so you can trust me.

This is my favorite interpretation

Seers are fun

In post 3668, WhemeStar wrote:

In post 3658, Bell wrote:The wheme dream thing,
Sigmund was not targeted by anyone and he tried to protect someone and missed.
I have an associates in dream interpretation (this is a lie) so you can trust me.

I asked just to be sure if its only stuff that happens to my target and not what my target did and unwnd said yes

Something happened to your target then because we were told our action was successful.

I was also told that.

Heres a fun scenario

I use my "conftown status" to shield town faer from elimination, jump on a bus early to achieve that hard core white knighting, bus right out the gate and play an amazing theatrical show with my partner.

So now I'm one of 4 scum remaining and its only d3

I buy myself another day by claiming I can't take an action on the second night but then I'm expected to give a result on said 4 game day