Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:09 am
Idk this just feels like town VP by gut maybe he’s big braining here but it seems like his townplay
Not really, no. I am promoting him for SCUM MVP though, in the sense that he is likely a townie that is playing it all into the hands of scumIn post 3644, Frogsterking wrote:Eyes are you proposing a Nero wagon?
Perfect. So I'm scum irregardless of whatever VPB's alignment is?In post 3645, Nero Cain wrote:I don't care what your read of him is but there should be a progression and a lack of progression makes you look informed whether its that you know that he's town or that he's your buddy and you are expressing a town read on him so you don't have to vote him.
You are making this out like Nero is being dishonest, but he is allowed to scumread an action you've taken on own.In post 3654, Eyes without a face wrote:Perfect. So I'm scum irregardless of whatever VPB's alignment is?In post 3645, Nero Cain wrote:I don't care what your read of him is but there should be a progression and a lack of progression makes you look informed whether its that you know that he's town or that he's your buddy and you are expressing a town read on him so you don't have to vote him.
It's possible yes. But I also think you're doing alot of fussing...In post 3654, Eyes without a face wrote:Perfect. So I'm scum irregardless of whatever VPB's alignment is?In post 3645, Nero Cain wrote:I don't care what your read of him is but there should be a progression and a lack of progression makes you look informed whether its that you know that he's town or that he's your buddy and you are expressing a town read on him so you don't have to vote him.
Nero, do you feel like you're bad faithing me at all this game if you take a second to consider I'm town?In post 3640, VP Baltar wrote:If you are actually town here, I have reached out to you more than once to try and resolve these differences we have in seeing the game and you keep trying to take cheap, stupid shots at me. Be more mature and talk to me if you want me to engage you again. I asked you for your perspective on skitter awhile back now and you just basically ignored me. It's incredibly frustrating to me if you're actually town in this scenario because I make good faith efforts to think about your alignment, and there is no reciprocation. And I don't really want to have pointless convos that just bloat the thread.
Yeah, it's lazy. Maybe informed, but could also just be holding onto reads. I don't really know. Are you saying you want to flip Eyes today?In post 3661, Nero Cain wrote:I don't care if he agrees with me or not just that town reading you off of your 15th post makes him look informed and not really paying attention to the game.
why have you repeatedly not engaged with me when I've tried to do things like talk about your skitter read then? I feel like when I am trying to set aside your nonstop surface level spamming of calling me scum and try to actually talk to you, you're just nonresponsive. That doesn't feel like good faith from my perspective.In post 3664, Nero Cain wrote:I could have conf bias but I'm not treating you in bad faith.
I think your bad faith is more likely just really bad town play and tunneling. You've stuck with it too long, considering you're going to look like shit if I ever flip. Scum you would know that. (Which is also why i think if you back off too late on my wagon it is +scum for you). I don't really get OMGUSy too often with people for bad reads. That doesn't make a person scum automatically.In post 3667, Nero Cain wrote:then how can you town read me? You basically just keep calling me scum here but you won't push. Why?
Yes, I called it out before it could even rise to an issue. If you're going to snipe me all game, I expect you to follow through. I'm not going to leave the door open for a scummy backpedal at the last minute to give plausible deniability in a clear misyeet distraction today. If you do happen to be scum here, you would have gotten away with your Wu backpedal.In post 3669, Nero Cain wrote:You know that I never unvoted, right?
Fixed.In post 3648, Eyes without a face wrote:Enchant because of the Vig claim which I don't believeIn post 3475, April Ludgate wrote:Can you explain your VP/Enchant/STD/Deas reads for me?any scumanyone in their right mind wouldfakeclaim on D1. Not even if they were informed that there is no Vig would scum have the heart to claim something they know they will never be able to prove.
sure.In post 3673, Nero Cain wrote:I didn't backpedal on Wu. There was contradicting evidence and I listened to that. Like I said earlier if you thought Wu was so bad that he needed to be that d1 elimination then fine? He played pretty poorly down the stretch and I was more than ok with his elimination. But still, that's not a backtrack, and claiming that it is one is a horrible misrep and/or treatingin bad faith.ME
You won't vote me b/c I'm not the path of least resistance.