Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:57 am
It's cause he thought you and I were scumIn post 3673, Brian Skies wrote:Oh wait nevermind you did.
Page 148 of 177
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:57 am
Hmm. Idk. I don't think you ever checked back in so I'm not buying this response about 'would have moved over and lynched srceen.'
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:57 am
im jesus apparently
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:57 am
nero i need to borrow your avatar
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:58 am
oh and while im here
vote: cheeky
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:01 am
Scum who never puts in a fail card is functionally equivilent to an extra town.
Town who put in a fail card are breaking core game rules.
Screen claimed it was possible to do something it's not possible to do in game to attack Pan, likely hoping nobody would realize it couldn't be done.
It's possible he could have said 'oh, I meant I was playing online and I'd look at the role after a couple of nights'. I would have doubted that because:
- I checked on site, and he wasn't playing there.
- It sounded like he meant playing irl.
- Checking your role card irl would be a lot trickier than online due to the fact you can see people/body language and stuff.
- Talking about people getting annoyed d1 is different to not checking d1/intent to check later.
-He didn't say that when I asked him, he dodged the question (or gave an answer that didn't explain things).
Town who put in a fail card are breaking core game rules.
Screen claimed it was possible to do something it's not possible to do in game to attack Pan, likely hoping nobody would realize it couldn't be done.
It's possible he could have said 'oh, I meant I was playing online and I'd look at the role after a couple of nights'. I would have doubted that because:
- I checked on site, and he wasn't playing there.
- It sounded like he meant playing irl.
- Checking your role card irl would be a lot trickier than online due to the fact you can see people/body language and stuff.
- Talking about people getting annoyed d1 is different to not checking d1/intent to check later.
-He didn't say that when I asked him, he dodged the question (or gave an answer that didn't explain things).
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:02 am
I see a Corpsekington I vote with a Corpsekington
VOTE: cheeky
VOTE: cheeky
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:06 am
HAHAHAHA noIn post 3669, Brigand Vvulf wrote:series of bad posts. If we apply the 1 in 3 rule? creature is scum here
This was so bad I'm tempted to lay down a vote for you. Why push Creature here?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:07 am
hahaha so funny xd
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:07 am
In post 3676, Brian Skies wrote:Hmm. Idk. I don't think you ever checked back in so I'm not buying this response about 'would have moved over and lynched srceen.'
I have work, but I checked the thread (not sure if it was at lunch or end of the day), and there was a hammer down and thread was 'locked'
It doesn't actually matter whether you buy it or not since it's only a lie if I'm scum, so it becomes circular.
- If I'm town I'm telling the truth because why not.
- If I'm scum I'm lying for whatever reason (or telling the truth, which is a functional lie anyway in that scenario since the motive is different)
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:08 am
This was your last post before the day ended.In post 3454, Hopkirk wrote:Absence.In post 3452, the worst wrote:> aware of metaIn post 3451, Hopkirk wrote:Screen isn't a townread anymore Thor.
Phone posting is hard.
Someone should meta me. I have a couple of obvious scumtells.
> tells us to look for scumtells to prove towniness
....wat
@Brian- preferably your thoughts.
You said he was hammered by the time you got on next. We didn't actually get a lynch till the last 30 minutes or so of the deadline. Were you waiting until last minute to check in or...?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:09 am
Okay I see you've already responded to me. I'll think about it.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:15 am
This isnt a real response to my real question.In post 3683, Brigand Vvulf wrote:hahaha so funny xd
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:17 am
Probably wouldn't have switched if GI was bigger.
Hammer was at 5.30 my time. Checked in when I got home from work and there'd been a hammer.
Although looks like deadline was earlier than I thought and I might have missed the opportunity anyway. Didn't check the timer.
Hammer was at 5.30 my time. Checked in when I got home from work and there'd been a hammer.
Although looks like deadline was earlier than I thought and I might have missed the opportunity anyway. Didn't check the timer.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:21 am
I kind of just want to lynch Hopkirk for Ausuka's 'he looks genuinely uninformed' defense.
What are people's reads on Pan?
What are people's reads on Pan?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:24 am
Looking into this, he clearly said he just plays as town.In post 3680, Hopkirk wrote:Scum who never puts in a fail card is functionally equivilent to an extra town.
Town who put in a fail card are breaking core game rules.
Screen claimed it was possible to do something it's not possible to do in game to attack Pan, likely hoping nobody would realize it couldn't be done.
It's possible he could have said 'oh, I meant I was playing online and I'd look at the role after a couple of nights'. I would have doubted that because:
- I checked on site, and he wasn't playing there.
- It sounded like he meant playing irl.
- Checking your role card irl would be a lot trickier than online due to the fact you can see people/body language and stuff.
- Talking about people getting annoyed d1 is different to not checking d1/intent to check later.
-He didn't say that when I asked him, he dodged the question (or gave an answer that didn't explain things).
Which sounds like maybe a crappy way to play - but not a lie.
Does look like an attack on Panop though.
Meh, okay, let's leave Panop off the table.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:26 am
I was more negative about Pan until Hopkirk pointed out Srceen's limp wrist attack.In post 3689, Brian Skies wrote:I kind of just want to lynch Hopkirk for Ausuka's 'he looks genuinely uninformed' defense.
What are people's reads on Pan?
I'd be fine with a Hopkirk lynch at the moment, but I'm still not fully settled in on who I'd like dead. Had plots for Ausuka, but now those are settled, so...y'know, new victims needed.
Probably scum on Grey wagon though - I like the idea of lynching there.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:27 am
You're a winner! Well beeboy and random were floating votes places, which makes me feel slightly better about them, but you don't think that's a list of 8 townies, even with 3 scum dead, do you? I think it is not. I think it really, certainly is not. The scum lost way too much yesterday, and they can't have wanted to do that. Ausuka was in a bad position, with or without the vig (although great shooting, vig, if you exist - look up Camden to see what might be going on here).In post 3663, Thor665 wrote:Not thrilled by the Nero, Tchill, Chickadee or randommidget names there.In post 3657, GreyICE wrote:I would like to lynch from this list: Nero Cain(229), Creature(298), Hopkirk(204), Tchill13(97), CheekyTeeky(163), Chickadee(414) Beeboy(87), randomidget(190)
Currently have Creature, Cheeky, and Beeboy all as various soft levels of town also.
Hopkirk is a big pile of 'meh' right now.
Is that your entire wagon at peak?
Suggests one of my reads is bad, or at least that I have a soft town lean on a scummer.
Chickadee pushing Brigand Vvulf of all people hurts me inside.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:30 am
Yeah, but Chickadee slot is town, that's a pretty solid read in my head.
We can do Hop to be lazy and just to flip him, but I'm kinda meh on it still from yesterday.
Cheeky probably isn't a bad push - might need to re-read that slot and Beeboy, the Beeboy read is assuredly stale at this stage, so might be wrong.
We can do Hop to be lazy and just to flip him, but I'm kinda meh on it still from yesterday.
Cheeky probably isn't a bad push - might need to re-read that slot and Beeboy, the Beeboy read is assuredly stale at this stage, so might be wrong.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:31 am
'Justing playing as a townie' is part of the problem.
It's equivilent to removing a scum and adding an extra town instead.
Unless it just meant looking at it at the start of the mission phase if there were two passes already, but that's also really stupid.
Plus, in practice unless with complete newbies, scum would assume someone misread their card and stop the game during the pregame identification stage.
It's equivilent to removing a scum and adding an extra town instead.
Unless it just meant looking at it at the start of the mission phase if there were two passes already, but that's also really stupid.
Plus, in practice unless with complete newbies, scum would assume someone misread their card and stop the game during the pregame identification stage.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:32 am
Can we wait until people give opinions on me before putting votes down there?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:33 am
Hopkirk's interaction with Screenplay wasn't awful.In post 3693, Thor665 wrote:Yeah, but Chickadee slot is town, that's a pretty solid read in my head.
We can do Hop to be lazy and just to flip him, but I'm kinda meh on it still from yesterday.
Cheeky probably isn't a bad push - might need to re-read that slot and Beeboy, the Beeboy read is assuredly stale at this stage, so might be wrong.
I'd rather do Cheeky or Nero Cain tbh.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:34 am
Just quoting this. Please ignore.In post 113, Hopkirk wrote:You are 100% confirmed scum to me right now. We need to 1v1. Anyone who votes outside of us from this point on is confirmed wolf. On a scale of one to infinity, you are infinitly scum. You need to flip to death and I willIn post 98, GreyICE wrote:Could you self vote and speed things up?In post 93, Hopkirk wrote:Voting scum isn't a good way to find scum.
We've already found scum.
The problem is voting them.pillageyour corpse for the towncred that will naturally follow from me being so so right about how terrible a thing you are. That's right, a thing, not a person. You can try and hide it all you want, but everyone witheyescan BLATENTLY see exactly what you are doing here. It makes me sick to even be having to case you for being obvious scum here. Anyone who isn't voting for Grey here should take a moment to consider whether they read their role pms wrong, because being scum is literally the only way you couldn't see exactly what kind ofSICKgame Greyice is trying to play here. The scum/wolf stench is so strong I can bearly bear actually voting with him. The association with that much scum in one place makes me feel like scum too. You are the scumabyssand even a glance makes me feel worse, let alone a gaze. The scumminess radiating from you in every direction makes me want to lynch you, and the people above and below you in the playerlist. I am shocked and appalled that you haven't been either lynched, or vigged already. It is simply inconcievable that you, scum incarnate, are still here right now.
They'll never suspect thisreally isa mutual hard bus.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:38 am
Ok, but how do you feel about his push on easy-to-read-creature?In post 3692, GreyICE wrote:Chickadee pushing Brigand Vvulf of all people hurts me inside.
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:40 am
Also I'm nowhere near as convinced on a Creature town read as you are.
Because I might want to lynch Tchill as well. I know, I know, it was kind of a drum I beat day 1, but I have yet to be convinced it's a bad one.
What's the followup on this, friends?
Because I might want to lynch Tchill as well. I know, I know, it was kind of a drum I beat day 1, but I have yet to be convinced it's a bad one.