Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 9:26 am
obviously the nature of your supposed task means you cannot double post. however both your tasks are seemingly ones that obfuscate what you have to say. Regardless I doubt that there would be a task to restrict word count. Postcount maybe? Or perhaps postcount AND word count. but otherwise it is so vague that this doesn't make sense. If you have no restriction on posts per day then u should be fine to post once someone else posts. Obviously town!you would not not be allowed to break up a post and just c/p it in parts. but to just post responses to posts as you go is totally fair game.In post 3677, Flea The Magician wrote:wow catching up and someone finally noticed xD amazing.
Look at the rest of the post. I also claimed admin.
I came clean in the night PT as well on arrival in admin.
It was done to see who was paying attention.
Also, spirit of the task, game moves fast, etc...
ellaborateIn post 3659, MURDERCAT wrote:Windows TMI?
i made it pretty clear. I wont repeat this again because ive already claimed it like 2 times. maybe if i make it simpler for u??In post 3662, SirCakez wrote:wtf is this?In post 3635, DkKoba wrote:I didnt claim my ROOM was sabotaged. i said my TASK was sabotaged. like my slot went to submit it as completed and i was told it was sabotaged by scum - which im asssuming means that it doesnt count and i have to redo it to get it done - (i prob will die tonight via the factional nightkill.)
does anyone else have a non-2 number of tasks btw? this could also be a scumclaim.In post 144, Titus wrote:I have one.In post 35, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:should we all claim task number? i see no reason not to
I have 2
I plan on doing mine asap so I can pick up one of the other tasks and then do it.
...run that past me again?In post 3677, Flea The Magician wrote:wow catching up and someone finally noticed xD amazing.
Look at the rest of the post. I also claimed admin.
I came clean in the night PT as well on arrival in admin.
It was done to see who was paying attention.
Also, spirit of the task, game moves fast, etc...
VOTE: Flea
Ah fuck. Shit. Crap. I swore I'd not slip up like this.In post 3681, mastina wrote:VOTE: Flea
As promised.
Small confession--after one of my times interacting with Flea, I was desperate to try and find a reason in faer iso to townread fae.
Unfortunately, I came to the opposite conclusion when I iso'd Flea, because I noticed three different post restrictions on three different days, in spite of how on D1 it seemed like Flea was miserably failing faer posting restriction that day. And while the second posting restriction was too much effort for me to read in spite of it being on the critical D2 and the D3 restriction is harsh, the presence of three, separate, posting restrictions, when I only have two, did set off a red flag to me since if this was explained, I didn't see it.
And the interactions I did see and interpret, weren't great.
I really, really enjoy Flea's presence in this game, and for that reason I'm not too happy to remove said presence, but I do admit that, yes, Flea is probably scum. </3
I could see your defense coming from scum to wk townie.In post 3679, WindowsXP wrote:ellaborate
SirCakez does not understand why he would claim it as townIn post 3672, Battle Mage wrote:i'm not sold on that bud. Scum were given safeclaims right? So I'm not convinced it's a scumslip, although agree it's maybe marginally scum indicative as town might remember their room better. I'm not getting too excited over it, but I wouldn't completely dismiss it either if that makes sense.In post 3664, SirCakez wrote:SirCakez cannot see how Flea claiming Storage is not a scumslip
other people have claimed thisIn post 3679, WindowsXP wrote:does anyone else have a non-2 number of tasks btw? this could also be a scumclaim.
Titus was with HC alone on n1. and they believe that HC is scum somehow when theyre the most clear to them.
wait did I get limmed without a defence chance? holy shit.In post 210, Flea The Magician wrote:Security and Storage.In post 64, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:every1 claim what rooms you need for your tasks
i will excel it and figure out optimal pathing
alisae will probly do it faster and better
[...snip...]
Hey I came in to the game less than an hour after it started and 6 pages! Get yo climbing gear ready, because until I'm in admin, there's gon be some waaaaaaalllllllls!In post 89, xRECKONERx wrote:ok good people are just spamming, i literally took like a 5 minute break and there were 4 pages
i'm not going to keep up with all this hyperposting nor am i going to be rereading the hyperposting that i miss, just as a heads up
i'm going to do other things now
[...snip...]
The other things is the imposters can claim tasks, but these won't count against town wincon? so it'd like automatically complete or something?In post 134, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:scum can only use the bonus NK on someone in a room if they are in the room with that person AND there are no other town in that room.
so if there r 2 town in a room, a bonus NK can't happen in that room.
also when someone dies, their tasks become open to be claimed, so that sets us back, hence why I said more alive townies = faster task completionThe other thing is there's a PT for each room so we'd have knowledge of who is in what room. So if someone is where they're not meant to be we'd know by the next room phase.In post 136, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:a scum has to fake-claim 2 rooms,In post 133, SirCakez wrote:can you show me how this works because I can't wrap my head around it
but let's say a townie is the only person who is going to room ____
then the scum can see that and also claim he needs to go to room _____
if we popcorn the mass claim right now, scum can't adjust to try to setup bonus nks etc.
I have just realised a flaw in the plan. My Storage task is a long task. I have to be there until it completes.
Why not?In post 3695, DrippingGoofball wrote:not feeling this choo choo
It's almost like I have to write my thoughts down and show my working because people don't like it when I don't... almost like I said the read was completely inconclusive and I didn't know what to think of it... hmm....In post 3519, Haschel Cedricson wrote: Anyway, I see there's a wagon on me right now. Haven't read back to see why yet but I'll find out now. You're gonna get my thoughts as I read the thread because fuck multiposting with my restriction.
***
I was asked to explain my scumreads. First of all, I mentioned Murdercat in my previous post; there are connections to known scum Bell that I don't like at all. I also think Flea is scummy for multiple reasons; faer reads have very little substance behind them, the late no-lim vote was bad, and if you parse the no-vowel thing Flea says "I'll have read and the Bell case is priority tomorrow but I'm not expecting to be convinced" which doesn't look great in light of Bell's flip. In fact, on Day 1 Flea said a lot of things about Murdercat that ended up in a shrug and no conclusions; I can absolutely see a Bell/Murdercat/Flea team.
Yup, we confirmed that.In post 3519, Haschel Cedricson wrote: ***
Reck, I was in Admin last night. I assume Taly or Flea answered that.
AndIn post 3519, Haschel Cedricson wrote: [snip]
***
Wow, Murdercat just quotes a bunch of my posts and votes for me with no analysis except "seen enough for suss". Murdercat, what specifically do you object to in those posts you quoted in #3430?
This would be a good time to mention my "scumslip" that I confessed almost immediately after some slight flirting with Taly. Yet, it is absent. It was mentioned quite a bit as well as Taly interrogated me for it. Talked for a bit was about 6 posts most in total between them btw.In post 3519, Haschel Cedricson wrote: [snip]
***Obviously I don't have access to the thread any more but from memory it wentHC i'd like you to describe what happened N1 in your room with Titus. would be helpful if you added that to the response to what you did n2 that reck is asking you.
[snip]
Night Two I was in Admin with Taly and Flea. Taly and I talked for a bit but I don't remember about what. Then Flea showed up and saying my thoughts to scum didn't seem appealing so I just lurked the rest of the night.
ITS NEKKID! Basically anyway.
In post 3652, Haschel Cedricson wrote: First thing we can see is that Flea was the second vote on the wagon that Bell was pushing, on a player I have concluded is town.You and most of the rest of us...
Here’s everything that Flea said about Bell, as well as Flea’s list of reads.
Nothing committal about Bell at all, and says he “was where he said he would be” as way of explanation why fae is not joining the Bellwagon and is instead joining the Tituswagon. We also see dismay that Bell was hammered, and a scumread on a player we know 100% is town.
Oh I'm sorry would you like me to chop my posts up into 50 word chunks and post stupid amounts of times in a row? Kinda defeats the point of the restriction and given how quick this game can move at times... I'd miss so muchIn post 3652, Haschel Cedricson wrote: I’m gonna come back to the Bellwagon chart in a bit, but faer play today is pretty bad as well.
Unless there is also a postcount restriction, which we haven’t been given any indication exists, there is literally nothing preventing Flea from clarifying the posts in question over time. Unless, of course, fae doesn’t want to.Flea wrote:As much as I'd love to clarify those posts, theyre over my 50 word limit and blatently breaching that is liable to be bad, especially as this is my long task I'll have a read over once I've slept (whoo 4am) and break them down for you.
Ah yes, using my restrictions against me, Good job. How else would you like me to refer to my piss poor opinion on your ISO? Whats your thoughts on my flash wagon? hm?In post 3652, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Bullshit. I dedicated an entire paragraph to Flea in the same post I made my vote. Here it is again:Flea wrote:I still have no idea why Hasc is voting me.
Consider this Intent then I guess? I should look at their ISO.
Don’t pretend you have no idea about something that was spelled out and then say you’re announcing intent. Also, putting somebody at E-1 because their ISO leaves you “massively unimpressed” is not a good look, especially when it’s the holidays and that person hasn’t had a chance to get back to the game yet to post about a wagon that flared up for shaky reasons.HC wrote:I was asked to explain my scumreads. First of all, I mentioned Murdercat in my previous post; there are connections to known scum Bell that I don't like at all. I also think Flea is scummy for multiple reasons; faer reads have very little substance behind them, the late no-lim vote was bad, and if you parse the no-vowel thing Flea says "I'll have read and the Bell case is priority tomorrow but I'm not expecting to be convinced" which doesn't look great in light of Bell's flip. In fact, on Day 1 Flea said a lot of things about Murdercat that ended up in a shrug and no conclusions; I can absolutely see a Bell/Murdercat/Flea team.
Aight me ol mucker, you asked or it.In post 3652, Haschel Cedricson wrote: Can anybody else in this game look at Flea today and honestly say they are doing any scumhunting at all? Even a little bit? I can’t say that; Flea has spent the entire day talking about faer post restriction and talking about how claiming was a bad idea after all. The latter was obvious from the start of the game. Normally I’d say there’s no followup but Flea is not producing anything with which to follow up on in the first place! Flea, you think I’m scum? Fucking interrogate me. Don’t just speak vague “I don’t understand why HC is voting for me”s in my general direction.
Almost like I claimed it in the PT and now the Hasc wagon is at risk of going through it's a surprise bit of evidence. Oy... lol.In post 3652, Haschel Cedricson wrote: Oh, I forgot about this but check out post #210. Specifically this part of #210:
There is no Storage room on the ship.Flea wrote:
In post 3655, xRECKONERx wrote:ok i finally parsed that without the fucked up quote tags
let's roll
VOTE: flea
In post 3681, mastina wrote:VOTE: Flea
As promised.
Small confession--after one of my times interacting with Flea, I was desperate to try and find a reason in faer iso to townread fae.
Unfortunately, I came to the opposite conclusion when I iso'd Flea, because I noticed three different post restrictions on three different days, in spite of how on D1 it seemed like Flea was miserably failing faer posting restriction that day. And while the second posting restriction was too much effort for me to read in spite of it being on the critical D2 and the D3 restriction is harsh, the presence of three, separate, posting restrictions, when I only have two, did set off a red flag to me since if this was explained, I didn't see it.
And the interactions I did see and interpret, weren't great.
I really, really enjoy Flea's presence in this game, and for that reason I'm not too happy to remove said presence, but I do admit that, yes, Flea is probably scum. </3