Mafiascum.net

In post 3669, CheekyTeeky wrote:1. I thought he might be NK to make all the people pushing him look bad.

So Gamma is town.

Only if cheeks is scum and I guess it's not impossible that scum targets her buddy that she thinks will be investigated

Khzfzmyxmh ihcykitsyxykx oydi6foy.

In post 3676, Nero Cain wrote:Only if cheeks is scum and I guess it's not impossible that scum targets her buddy that she thinks will be investigated

Cheeky's argument TMI's Gamma!town, is what I'm saying.

Or am I wrong?

You could interpret it that way I guess

Nero has a point about checking for people targeting a buddy
But I do kinda think whoever mentioned me not being a likely investigation target made sense as well
Tbh the only investigating role I could see targeting me in that scenario is something loyal/disloyal that has non-investigative functionality

In post 3493, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 3252, Gamma Emerald wrote:I legit forgot she was in this game 0_0

...I have my pronoun right under my avatar. My God.

Get well soon.

I was diagnosed with a pronoun before. It's as serious as one would think.

Why are we not having a quick day today?

Cheeks idk y u r getting mad when it's your play that's gotten u suspected. Like I just don't really feel like targeting a vanilla that got ran up d1 was the best use of your action. What am I not understanding here? Also you miseliminated me as a town invest so it's poetic justice although I think I'm a little more thoughtful.

In post 3681, Almost50 wrote:serious

Is there a chance we'll see game-related content? Be still, my heart!

In post 3559, CheekyTeeky wrote:I am a watcher,

Excuse me, WHAT??? You're a WATCHER, who saw MegA claim WATCHER and decided not only to not CC, but also unvoted and let the wagon get redirected unto cyrus???

In post 3562, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3560, Dwlee99 wrote:So we had a watcher claim... and you kept the person who claimed it alive another day?

Yes it was perfect because DGB had claimed and there was a decent chance they were going to be targeted by scum so I left the watcher alive knowing they were scum to catch more scum. It was genius until my role failed...

Hmmm... maybe it was the correct play after all.. even if it did fail. Yeah, I can understand your logic there

In post 3669, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3668, Roden wrote:

In post 3658, CheekyTeeky wrote:Someone vig me and put me out of my misery. Note to self to assess players level of reasoning before attempting to gain maximum utility out of a role instead of CCing and being killed.

If there actually was a Vig, Shrek would already be dead.

Also it's really unfair to say our reasoning is bad when you've been asked multiple times why you Watched Gamma N1 when that's only something scum would gain important info from. All you've done is blankly defend it without telling us why you actually did it or what you hope to gain from it.

I already have posted my reasons for it, if you don't like them that's a matter of opinion. Here it is again:

1. I thought he might be NK to make all the people pushing him look bad.
2. I thought Nero/DGB were scum based on play therefore likely to NK gamma.

I wasn't expecting to gain any information N1 because I'd have to try and predict scum NK which I knew was unlikely. Why would a scum watcher watch Gamma and not A50 or someone else quietly watching the thread as PRs typically do?

In post 3670, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3668, Roden wrote:why you Watched Gamma N1 when that's only something scum would gain important info from.

Like explain this to me because it makes no sense at all.

In post 3672, CheekyTeeky wrote:You're both saying my target was dumb but not dumb enough for a protective or cop to target which is contridictory.

In post 3674, Nero Cain wrote:No it's not? Like I could see an invest target gamma but I think a protective never does. But then if you were a town watcher why would you want to catch a protect or invest? That's actually csfs and rodent point that it makes more sense as a scum watcher to target gamma than a town one

Nero pretty much covered it here.

If Gamma is scum, his scum buddies never target him. They can't kill him and would only ever Rolestop him to prevent investigation roles from getting info, which we know didn't happen because your N1 action was successful.

If Gamma is town, due to claiming VT there's no reason to think scum Cops or Blocks him. They also definitely don't kill him because he has more use as a mis-elim than a NK target to shade his detractors.

If I'm Watcher, I always just target PR claims or the highest town read player or town leader. Targeting a scummy VT claim just doesn't make sense to me.

Actually, Cheeky who did you target last night?

Tbh I forgot Gamma had claimed VT so maybe it wasn't the best target, I'll concede that but again it's unlikely any target I chose would have given me anything so it's not really wasted. Like anyone who thinks they would have watched Norwee is kidding themselves.

In post 3688, Roden wrote:Actually, Cheeky who did you target last night?

Dwlee.

In post 3683, Nero Cain wrote:Cheeks idk y u r getting mad when it's your play that's gotten u suspected. Like I just don't really feel like targeting a vanilla that got ran up d1 was the best use of your action. What am I not understanding here? Also you miseliminated me as a town invest so it's poetic justice although I think I'm a little more thoughtful.

Oh your bitterness makes sense now.

In post 3689, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I forgot Gamma had claimed VT so maybe it wasn't the best target, I'll concede that but again it's unlikely any target I chose would have given me anything so it's not really wasted. Like anyone who thinks they would have watched Norwee is kidding themselves.

I wouldn't have guessed Norwee either, which I guess was the point with that NK. Gamma is just such a weird choice though, even with your explanation.

In post 3690, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3688, Roden wrote:Actually, Cheeky who did you target last night?

Dwlee.

Why Dwlee over someone in the neighborhood?

In post 3677, CheekyTeeky wrote:Khzfzmyxmh ihcykitsyxykx oydi6foy.

That's how the whole thread seems to me at times. Tbh, DotW is the only one whose posts make sense consistently (obviously reading and comprehending the thread). Everyone else is either not reading, making some bizarre assumptions/conclusions, tunneled, or a mix of those three.

I had already done DGB and my action failed so wanted to be sure I was being blocked by targeting elsewhere. Scum never kill LQ even if confirmed town for obvious reasons.

In post 3684, DrippingGoofball wrote:Be still, my heart!

GOOD suggestion. Thank you

Hey, with any luck, Shrek will flip scum RB, and Cheeky's role will resolve itself tonight.

I would prefer KittyTacky give a readlist before ending the day.

VOTE: Shrek

L-2 it is.

(Just in case you end the day while I'm offline like you did twice thus far)

The power of notsci compelled me.

Sure I'm being bitter. Get over yourself