Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 6:19 am
No. Can you answer my questionIn post 3673, Andante wrote:I mean, are you confident she's maf?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
No. Can you answer my questionIn post 3673, Andante wrote:I mean, are you confident she's maf?
he answered a lot quicker than you, and you were like "haha I wanna vote the tracker claim"In post 3674, Something_Smart wrote:You don't think scum-Cakez would keep track of who he wants to vote?In post 3671, Andante wrote:I think cakez is town tbh, I liked how he gave the names he'd vote when I asked, like idk felt towny to me
You really thought about it? I don't see how voting out the tracker claim is ever a good idea hereIn post 3677, Something_Smart wrote:Why is answering fast instead of thinking about it town indicative? Town has to put more thought into it than scum...
Yes, I thought about it, because I don't normally view reads in those terms.In post 3678, Andante wrote:You really thought about it? I don't see how voting out the tracker claim is ever a good idea here
...In post 3685, Andante wrote:like dats voted because of my tracker claim
That's kinda how I'm reading it; you saying it's weird for me to be voting the tracker claim implies that your tracker claim means you shouldn't be voted.In post 3684, Andante wrote:I never said I was asking for a free pass?
I mean, I know there's genuine content in my other 400 posts here, unless you want to present some genuine case as to why I'm maf here, yeah it's very odd to be voting the tracker claim. It's 1 think if I had posts like Alyssa/Mena(Pooky) here but I've genuinely been like "yo reads are here, I think X maf cause this" it's literally not my fault people choose to ignore my actual solving, and instead go "ewww why are you team reading. that's a bad way to play" yet not even engage with my reads like "I think you're off on this part, I tr this" so I'm doing what I can with what I'm being given, meanwhile half the table is just coasting/not hereIn post 3688, Something_Smart wrote:That's kinda how I'm reading it; you saying it's weird for me to be voting the tracker claim implies that your tracker claim means you shouldn't be voted.In post 3684, Andante wrote:I never said I was asking for a free pass?
In post 824, Something_Smart wrote:also it just hit me that Andante is top in the draft. That's another reason to scumread her, I guess.
In post 829, Something_Smart wrote:There's a pretty clear correlation between being high in the draft and being scum in PYP games.
The reasons I can think of are (a) scum are less likely to collide in general because they will avoid colliding with each other, (b) based on (a) they are more likely to go for low numbers because it's safer, and (c) they are likely to put more calculation and thought into the draft than town.
In post 830, Something_Smart wrote:I literally spent the entirety of the last PYP game I played correctly calling the top drafter scumIn post 828, Andante wrote:You're just jealous cause you were bottom of the draft
In post 1036, Something_Smart wrote:maybe not, but one of the high drafters probably is.In post 945, skitter30 wrote:pretty sure this time the top drafter isn't
In post 2078, Something_Smart wrote:o/
I think this does lessen my townread somewhat, exactly because of what happened to her last time she was high in the draft.
In post 2440, Something_Smart wrote:I'm not a good neighbor target, in all seriousness. I don't sort much in hoods, and I'm low on the draft so not likely to have PR info, and I would smoke her ass at chess (Faker has seen my lichess profile and can confirm this).
In post 2883, Something_Smart wrote:Based on my data no scum has landed 3rd in the draft with a number lower than 8, in fact they have been pretty consistently high (8, 9, 10, 11). If this sounds like a bullshit statistical coincidence, that's because it is, but I think the logic makes at least a tiny amount of sense because based on the data when scum go for a medium-low number they often also go for a lower which might collide, but it if it does, the medium-low number is likely to score a very good place in the draft (higher than 3rd).In post 2876, innocentvillager wrote:and what is that?
Look, I warned you that it was dumb.
In post 3263, Something_Smart wrote:why would the top draft spot be afraid of getting NK'd? Gee, I don't know...In post 3261, Andante wrote:why would I fear death?
In post 3640, Something_Smart wrote:Top draft is decently correlated with being scum, her play has done nothing to shake me off of that, scum presumably made two kills and neither was aimed at the top 3 (which I believe is fairly rare? might be worth checking the stats there), she's been playing up how she is a known PR and how much that matters and then she claims under basically zero pressure with zero info, her reaction to the double kill was pretty awkward and may have betrayed knowledge that it was a scum vig, and now she's shading me off of Mena associatives rather than push me directly which may be to avoid OMGUS accusations.In post 3629, Datisi wrote:okay, *why*
ye. I tried top, but that was a no go, too many, went for draft instead, tbh all I even remember from you this game for why I've been maf all game has been cause I'm top of draftIn post 3693, Something_Smart wrote:Did you just search my 181-post ISO for the word "draft" and find 9 examples to prove that I do nothing but talk about the draft
yeah what about it? I thought it was funny I was a known pr? it's why I was claiming bp on day 1 lol like I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to say to this, like, not taking into acount anything serious I've said? ok, and? Don't like posts I thought were funny/was having fun? ok.. shading you off mena? I mean, I don't exactly tr you, nothing you've done couldn't be easily replicated by scum! you, like idk, I also don't sr you enough to tunnel you yet, but you're definitely a lot different from the fish game so mehh, and I can definitely see town you being like you are I guess? idk, I'm not sorting you now, and I mean, ideally we're trying to solve for a scum here, not this back and forth whateverIn post 3640, Something_Smart wrote:Top draft is decently correlated with being scum, her play has done nothing to shake me off of that, scum presumably made two kills and neither was aimed at the top 3 (which I believe is fairly rare? might be worth checking the stats there), she's been playing up how she is a known PR and how much that matters and then she claims under basically zero pressure with zero info, her reaction to the double kill was pretty awkward and may have betrayed knowledge that it was a scum vig, and now she's shading me off of Mena associatives rather than push me directly which may be to avoid OMGUS accusations.In post 3629, Datisi wrote:okay, *why*
This feels like a comfy solve
When did this start?In post 3499, SirCakez wrote:Rethinking my read on you