no, your being dumb by not being on it. Read PV's posts. Seriously. Ignore Saki's cherry picking one he can twist. Cop calls a player scum multiple times you lynch that player. Period. You are being a stubborn cuss for not cooperating.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:30 pm
by RachMarie
Seriously Saki?
Just as I was rethinking my read on you bah
Been busy with work stuffs will post more tomorrow
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:30 pm
by Jordan_Downey
Sorry about that, Bulb. I promise a third won't be necessary. Life's been a little bit hectic and I genuinely forgot to keep up with this game. Yeah, I'm an asshat.
no, your being dumb by not being on it. Read PV's posts. Seriously. Ignore Saki's cherry picking one he can twist. Cop calls a player scum multiple times you lynch that player. Period. You are being a stubborn cuss for not cooperating.
This is like, the shittiest reasoning. I'm going to go over both of the wagons and hard reset, but I'm totally 0% behind this reasoning. It is clear that PerV did not have a guilty on Saki. Saki has pointed that out. You're
still
arguing his lynch based solely on PerV having a scumread on him. If SKOT isn't scum here, I don't know what to think.
I'm also giving up on syncing with my hydra partner, because we just can't seem to make the time to talk to each other.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:24 pm
by Xayzeck
↑Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:Read PV's posts. Seriously. Ignore Saki's cherry picking one he can twist. Cop calls a player scum multiple times you lynch that player. Period. You are being a stubborn cuss for not cooperating.
PV was cop, not a amazing miraculous scumhunting genius. He's not an idiot either, he would have vote-parked to make it more obv maybe.
Or a crumb, if you're going to bother finding one. "Let's lynch Saki because cop voted him and called him scum a lot" is a dumb argument, it's using a cop flip and a cop's bad/inaccurate reads to justify a dumb lynch.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:25 am
by Sharpest-knife-on-tree
please, just lynch me then. Either lynch Saki or me as I am absolutely fed up.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:28 am
by Sharpest-knife-on-tree
scratch that, got games disoriented. Feel free to run me up though.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:50 am
by Jordan_Downey
Yeah, so VOTE: SKOT
The Saki wagon is damned terrible. I could be convinced to switch to PN, but SKOT is more likely scum IMO.
I'm fully being Jingle being an asshat. Also fully behind our vote.
Honestly thought I had posted a bit more recent in here, but in a big decision point where I might be leaving my employment and it's been a little stressful.
The Saki wagon is damned terrible. I could be convinced to switch to PN, but SKOT is more likely scum IMO.
so please enlighten me oh great-wise hydra why you consider Saki wagon damned terrible?
The whole. There's no cohesive case. The biggest reasoning I can find for a case is "PerV said he was suspicious about Saki." There is no risk to jumping on this wagon, because you're putting the reasoning of it entirely on the shoulders of a dead player. There is exactly zero reason that PerV's role PM would make his reads any better, and yet you're making the argument that because he was a cop his suspicions that obviously don't have a result backing them up are somehow better.
IKA sheeped you on that shitty ass read. PN voted out of self preservation, which
might
be town, but is definitely not goodvotes. Saki voting himself is almost as expected as the sun shining in the morning from what I've heard.
Especially given the fact that I found PerV's case about as convincing as a kid in a bedsheet on Halloween pretending to be a ghost, I'll stand by my: "It's a shitty wagon." statement.
The Saki wagon is damned terrible. I could be convinced to switch to PN, but SKOT is more likely scum IMO.
so please enlighten me oh great-wise hydra why you consider Saki wagon damned terrible?
The whole. There's no cohesive case. The biggest reasoning I can find for a case is "PerV said he was suspicious about Saki." There is no risk to jumping on this wagon, because you're putting the reasoning of it entirely on the shoulders of a dead player. There is exactly zero reason that PerV's role PM would make his reads any better, and yet you're making the argument that because he was a cop his suspicions that obviously don't have a result backing them up are somehow better.
IKA sheeped you on that shitty ass read. PN voted out of self preservation, which
might
be town, but is definitely not goodvotes. Saki voting himself is almost as expected as the sun shining in the morning from what I've heard.
Especially given the fact that I found PerV's case about as convincing as a kid in a bedsheet on Halloween pretending to be a ghost, I'll stand by my: "It's a shitty wagon." statement.
The Saki wagon is damned terrible. I could be convinced to switch to PN, but SKOT is more likely scum IMO.
so please enlighten me oh great-wise hydra why you consider Saki wagon damned terrible?
The whole. There's no cohesive case. The biggest reasoning I can find for a case is "PerV said he was suspicious about Saki." There is no risk to jumping on this wagon, because you're putting the reasoning of it entirely on the shoulders of a dead player. There is exactly zero reason that PerV's role PM would make his reads any better, and yet you're making the argument that because he was a cop his suspicions that obviously don't have a result backing them up are somehow better.
IKA sheeped you on that shitty ass read. PN voted out of self preservation, which
might
be town, but is definitely not goodvotes. Saki voting himself is almost as expected as the sun shining in the morning from what I've heard.
Especially given the fact that I found PerV's case about as convincing as a kid in a bedsheet on Halloween pretending to be a ghost, I'll stand by my: "It's a shitty wagon." statement.
oh good lord, cases are someone making up whatever it is in their own mind to indicate and convince someone is bad. Please point me to one solid case that is not someone cherry picking or harping on shit. You cannot. Self-voting is Null. I have done it as scum, I have done it as town. When you have a cop proclaiming you as scum, you do whatever is necessary. If you want harp on shit factors outside of the COP SAYING HE IS BAD SEVERAL TIMES, just focus on his lack of engagement until things are thinned out and he is the focus of attention. Sure, you can say that Saki just always does that, the point is still there. The most compelling and sound piece of evidence one can find is a cop role stating more then once that a player is bad. Do I need to count and bump the # of times Peri called him bad, or you just going on the cherry picked quote that Saki is using to defend self. This is just plain outright dumb ass play and you can go on and play pretend making up cases and think you are all that when it is really just conbias and other smoke and mirrors.