Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:24 pm
Quick question guys. Was this staged in advance in the scum QT, or did you two break it out today for fun?
i would care about as much as notscience cares (which seems to be not at all at the moment)nacho wrote:So you don't care if Notscience is lynched and flips town
Selkies wasn't a mislynch candidate. Whenever I push for ffery's lynch, she goes into berserk town mode, and hoping she will die eventually when she's not playing horrible is an idiotic thought. If I was shot and the shot was blocked, I would need some luck and people who don't hate me around. I kill you, people tell me the kill points back to me, I call you obviously town and a strong player and that reasoning never gets traction.In post 3723, zMuffinMan wrote:also i'm not suggesting you never make kills that point back to you, but you were already under heavy suspicion (almost lynched D2), a possible vig candidate (as evidenced by every single post cabd made at the end of D2) and i don't think you'd want to risk shooting at a player that was going to point back at you on top of that IF cabd did claim to have shot you. coz he woulda been both suspicious of you being bulletproof and he woulda seen a kill that pointed back to you.
besides, killing selkies wasn't really a plausible option when they were still a viable mislynch candidate, and i clearly wasn't in the game enough for it to matter (especially since at least my read on goodfather was way off)
Why don't you think the no kill is a big deal of Cabd getting roleblocked is a big deal?In post 3726, zMuffinMan wrote:also you're focusing so much on the no kill not making sense, when i have stated multiple times i don't know what happened and i'm not trying to make sense of that (even if i can come up with possible explanations)
what you're failing to address is the important part of N2 (the ONLY important part, so stop making a big deal of the no kill occurring)
why was cabd blocked
instead of bringing it to D3 mylo
and you cannot come up with a reasonable explanation for this that involves me being scum with notscience
... we are not reading the same gamenacho wrote:Selkies wasn't a mislynch candidate
it wouldn't HAVE to get traction, it would just be there, lingering, on top of the fact you were already under heavy suspicion and if cabd had tried to vig you N2 there would have been a lot of circumstantial evidence pointing back to younacho wrote:I kill you, people tell me the kill points back to me, I call you obviously town and a strong player and that reasoning never gets traction
stop playing dumbnacho wrote:Why don't you think the no kill is a big deal of Cabd getting roleblocked is a big deal?
You can't come up with a plausible explanation for why anyone would no kill ever, so I guess we're back to the beginning yet again.In post 3733, zMuffinMan wrote:... we are not reading the same gamenacho wrote:Selkies wasn't a mislynch candidate
it wouldn't HAVE to get traction, it would just be there, lingering, on top of the fact you were already under heavy suspicion and if cabd had tried to vig you N2 there would have been a lot of circumstantial evidence pointing back to younacho wrote:I kill you, people tell me the kill points back to me, I call you obviously town and a strong player and that reasoning never gets traction
like
i can come up with possible explanations
i don't know what is right though
so you arguing the wifom train here doesn't do anyone a lot of good
and what you can't do is come up with a plausible explanation for me blocking cabd over letting the game go to D3 mylo which, with the game state as it was, woulda favoured a me, ns, goodfather team
sooooooooooooooooooooooo
yeah
Whatever townie he shoots is pretty much dead, so it isn't really that much of a risk to block him instead of letting him shoot.In post 3734, zMuffinMan wrote:stop playing dumbnacho wrote:Why don't you think the no kill is a big deal of Cabd getting roleblocked is a big deal?
there are multiple possible explanations for the no kill happening and all of them are soaked in wifom
there is NO good reason to block cabd if his vig list was all town players
i can, though, and i have multiple timesnacho wrote:You can't come up with a plausible explanation for why anyone would no kill ever
This continues to amaze me.In post 3729, zMuffinMan wrote:i would care about as much as notscience cares (which seems to be not at all at the moment)nacho wrote:So you don't care if Notscience is lynched and flips town
I know that feel.In post 3732, Selkies wrote:My eyes are bleeding.
NOnacho wrote:Whatever townie he shoots is pretty much dead, so it isn't really that much of a risk to block him instead of letting him shoot
Like it really, really continues to amaze me.In post 3739, Nachomamma8 wrote:This continues to amaze me.In post 3729, zMuffinMan wrote:i would care about as much as notscience cares (which seems to be not at all at the moment)nacho wrote:So you don't care if Notscience is lynched and flips town
And you played suboptimally so you could push this shit angle if your partners went down in burning flames.In post 3741, zMuffinMan wrote:NOnacho wrote:Whatever townie he shoots is pretty much dead, so it isn't really that much of a risk to block him instead of letting him shoot
NACHO
THIS ISN'T AN EXPLANATION
BECAUSE
OPTIMAL PLAY WAS LETTING CABD SHOOT AND BRINGING GAME TO D3 MYLO
IF HIS VIG LIST WAS ALL TOWN
STOP PLAYING FUCKING DUMB
yes, and now it comes out, the only possible explanation you can pushnacho wrote:And you played suboptimally so you could push this shit angle if your partners went down in burning flames.