Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:20 am**

Not the only one*

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:22 am**

In post 3722, Gamma Emerald wrote:home site, where you first played mafia

It's not a mafia specific forum. It's a fantasy football forum and I was introduced to it by some of my league mates.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:17 pm**

ok then

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:31 pm**

im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:35 pm**

In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad

Excuse me hoooooow was that a bad thing?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:36 pm**

Couldnt clear themselves of being last red is my guess

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:37 pm**

inb4 im scummy for answered your question not addressed to me, im still waiting for the pm and im planning to ask for mass claim once i get it

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:37 pm**

answering*

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:40 pm**

In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad

You're absolutely definitely utterly right, and I strongly ... WAIT! WHAT????

Why is blocking something that does NOTHING "quite bad" to you???

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:58 pm**

In post 3733, Almost50 wrote:
In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad
You're absolutely definitely utterly right, and I strongly ... WAIT! WHAT????

Why is blocking something that does NOTHING "quite bad" to you???

yep

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:49 pm**

In post 3733, Almost50 wrote:
In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad
You're absolutely definitely utterly right, and I strongly ... WAIT! WHAT????

Why is blocking something that does NOTHING "quite bad" to you???

It prevents us from confirming who is a religion spreader or not. Funny how you want us to assume they are all true?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:50 pm**

In post 3724, Jodaxq wrote:
In post 3719, Titus wrote:
In post 3712, Jodaxq wrote:
In post 3704, Titus wrote:
In post 3700, Almost50 wrote:
In post 3673, Titus wrote:I am a non consecutive night doctor.
I have voted Gamma since his soft claiming it was fake.
Elbrin died visiting Gamma.

Period.
Why is a JOAT with a protective shot suspect to a non-consecutive Doctor??
It's my job to protect brassherald and you're arguing mere coincidence that

a) gamma overlaps our roles
b) too many protectives
c) gamma saved by last second counter
d) The players pushing me were largely silent or townreading me until today.
What is the point of D. Yeah I haven't posted a ton. Does that make my read less valid? Does that make my claim illegitimate? Does it make me less town? This is absolutely worthless shading and looks extremely scummy.
And no. Your role and Gamma's role do not overlap. I come from a site with almost 100% role madness games and JOAT + full roles is completely standard.
You weren't part of the category in D. D is Gamma Almost and Chara. The people who couldn't be bothered to do anything until Gamma was about to die. (Queue Gamma AtE)

I don't know where you come from but where I come from Gamma's role conflicts with mine 90+ percent of the time and I have played a lot more than you.
I could believe your second statement if others did. I'm not the not one who think they don't conflict

Does Joey not count?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:00 pm**

Joey doesn't agree with you?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:02 pm**

I kinda think it should compete but im not certain im competent enough about setup spec to really have a voice there, its just the design mentality that tells me it should conflict considering a JOAT having 2 shots from existing roles + 1xtrack like another role

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:58 pm**

In post 3735, Titus wrote:
In post 3733, Almost50 wrote:
In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad
You're absolutely definitely utterly right, and I strongly ... WAIT! WHAT????

Why is blocking something that does NOTHING "quite bad" to you???
It prevents us from confirming who is a religion spreader or not. Funny how you want us to assume they are all true?

eh, thing here is that it was just a meh thing at this point i think. "quite bad" is kinda strongly worded there

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:08 pm**

In post 3735, Titus wrote:
In post 3733, Almost50 wrote:
In post 3728, marshy wrote:im a bit busy today but looks like not much has happened. all i want to say is b careful with the resolutions and lets try to pick an obvious one cuz last nights religions being blocked was quite bad
You're absolutely definitely utterly right, and I strongly ... WAIT! WHAT????

Why is blocking something that does NOTHING "quite bad" to you???
It prevents us from confirming who is a religion spreader or not. Funny how you want us to assume they are all true?

Why would they be fake? Would scum want to claim a worthwhile role?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:23 pm**

...cuz the entire town wanted more information about the religion spreading and being blocked inhibits just that?

wow

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:24 pm**

I mean we got plenty of info from everyone claiming it already plus the one that flipped?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:26 pm**

your statement isnt false. neither is mine

this is a dumb line of conversation

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:29 pm**

w/e I still feel like you're outrage is a little excessive

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:33 pm**

outrage is a strong word. i was just saying to be more careful (including myself) with the world congress so we can avoid things that shouldnt b an issue like powers that ppl want to verify not being able to do so. this just makes me feel worse about you/klazam cuz this is the kind of nulltell that scum like to pick at to look like theyre doing something

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:44 pm**

I mean I spoke out against it when I realized the implications but no one listened so I'm kinda jaded about it

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:51 pm**

klazoum do you agree to claim after the wc is outed ?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:53 pm**

Whats with wanting to confirm yourself so badly mate? Its obvious all the religions spreaders are what they say. We had literally no reason to come out at day 2 with this kind of role, it would be fucking dumb. At the dame time i sont see oue role being useful at all so i dont get why you are saying it was the worse thing.... really weird statement.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:54 pm**

Are you drunk lmao

Mafiascum.net

Sid Meier's Civilization 5 UPick Mafia (GAME OVER)