Mafiascum.net

In post 3724, fferyllt wrote:On a semi-related topic how do you feel about Cakez' recent posts?

I wish FakeGod had given me the role I asked him for the first time, a 16-shot daycig.

It's like a dayvig, but they die of lung cancer instead.


</snark>

But yeah, they've been uh... fine? Still have him near the top of the list and willingness to yell at the retirement home for masons is probably re-enforcement of that?

In post 3698, Nahdia wrote:alright you got me when i said "catching up" i meant "im gonna read the first page after my last post and the most recent page and call it even."

That’s why I post a lot of quotes when catching up generally, it helps me maintain my place if I get distracted

In post 3708, The Bulge wrote:you're saying "what good does it do to consider I might be wrong", then?

I think peta doesn’t want to seem like he’s challenging cabd to shoot him, that’s how I’d imagine saying “I don’t think you’re actually gonna shoot me” would come off, it’s a daring thing to actually say.

I mean my shoot pool by definition needs to be at least two people for what I hope are obvious reasons.

So even in townflip land peta can pray to RNJESUS

In post 3711, SirCakez wrote:isn't this a trust tell??????

Can’t really say but I think the self-awareness Bell shows when he says “well it was scum for the wrong reasons once” is interesting, as it shows he processes his play on what I think is a pretty deep level.

And I’ll fetch those examples that show the posting of mine I was talking about

In post 3728, Cabd wrote:I mean my shoot pool by definition needs to be at least two people for what I hope are obvious reasons.

So even in townflip land peta can pray to RNJESUS

You already named Nahdia and mwb as shot options you were considering at least on red flip

Btw that first post of this page makes me wonder, what’s the rules on posting stuff from mafia games in the no context quotes thread? Nothing from ongoing is what I’d presume but I want to check because that second line is perfect for it.

In post 3725, Cabd wrote:

In post 3724, fferyllt wrote:On a semi-related topic how do you feel about Cakez' recent posts?

I wish FakeGod had given me the role I asked him for the first time, a 16-shot daycig.

It's like a dayvig, but they die of lung cancer instead.


</snark>

But yeah, they've been uh... fine? Still have him near the top of the list and willingness to yell at the retirement home for masons is probably re-enforcement of that?

YaYa sisterhood thankyouverymuch.

What about compulsive self day-vig Cabd?

In post 3474, Gamma Emerald wrote:oh
wow I misread

BAD

In post 3476, Gamma Emerald wrote:I still think the way DS handled being wrong sucked but scratch the adoption of another's points thing I was pushing, that was a complete mistake

In post 3483, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm really open to other's opinion on DS because I've been tuned out for a while because of my misread

In post 3485, Gamma Emerald wrote:The issue is know through my own personal scum history that I tend to try and get conftown to doubt themselves if they're pushing accurate reads
I want the vig shot to be on me or DS tonight so I don't have to solve this situation for much longer

In post 3493, Gamma Emerald wrote:Go ahead and drive, I’ve clearly shown I can’t steer for shit

@Cakez this is what I mean by my reaction. When I realized I was so blatantly wrong on the thing I saw DS doing, I got super defeatist for a little bit.

I see

Why point this out to me so aggressively?

Yeah I've been the same sorta way. I'm tired of trying to bridge this gap between "there's no way Cabd isn't scum", "this set-up makes no sense with 4 masons and 4 pseudo-masons", and "we have 4 mason claims and 4 pseudo-mason claims".

And then if that's indeed the case, the rest of us are just white noise. You could almost literally solve the game and auto-win with just the 8 conf!town. (Since it's 8 conf!town versus 9 uncertains)

In post 3736, DiamondSentinel wrote:Yeah I've been the same sorta way. I'm tired of trying to bridge this gap between "there's no way Cabd isn't scum", "this set-up makes no sense with 4 masons and 4 pseudo-masons", and "we have 4 mason claims and 4 pseudo-mason claims".

And then if that's indeed the case, the rest of us are just white noise. You could almost literally solve the game and auto-win with just the 8 conf!town. (Since it's 8 conf!town versus 9 uncertains)

Yeah that's what we have been trying to do.


But remember that four of the masons take two kills to die.


So it's a little less optimal than it looks.

i guess i am a little shook despite what i said earlier, but to the extent of "conftown can have what they want because i'd feel bad if i forced the decision and was wrong", not to the level of feeling very differently about my read

I like peta

his decisive attitude feels good here =]

but that's probly just how he plays the game

Yeah that's unfortunate.

thanks pooky i like you too

In post 3734, SirCakez wrote:I see

In post 3735, SirCakez wrote:Why point this out to me so aggressively?

I thought you might have input on it based on past experience with you. The fact you don’t is probably a plus for your alignment being town though.

In post 3742, petapan wrote:thanks pooky i like you too

In post 3743, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3734, SirCakez wrote:I see

In post 3735, SirCakez wrote:Why point this out to me so aggressively?

I thought you might have input on it based on past experience with you. The fact you don’t is probably a plus for your alignment being town though.

I mean I don't think it looks bad for you
But I question your intentions here given you asked me to look at it more than once. Like you're fishing for towncred off of it.

In post 3731, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3725, Cabd wrote:

In post 3724, fferyllt wrote:On a semi-related topic how do you feel about Cakez' recent posts?

I wish FakeGod had given me the role I asked him for the first time, a 16-shot daycig.

It's like a dayvig, but they die of lung cancer instead.


</snark>

But yeah, they've been uh... fine? Still have him near the top of the list and willingness to yell at the retirement home for masons is probably re-enforcement of that?

YaYa sisterhood thankyouverymuch.

Yaya is your lot.

Retirement home for cranky masons is collective of all three groups.

In post 3745, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3743, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3734, SirCakez wrote:I see

In post 3735, SirCakez wrote:Why point this out to me so aggressively?

I thought you might have input on it based on past experience with you. The fact you don’t is probably a plus for your alignment being town though.

I mean I don't think it looks bad for you
But I question your intentions here given you asked me to look at it more than once. Like you're fishing for towncred off of it.

I was trying to read you off it, because in Cards of Destiny you had a pretty questionable reaction to similar content that I feel like was key to me catching you personally. I don’t think you’ve been playing dumb to get me to expand, so the fact you’re not forming a hard read is probably a good sign that you’re not trying to force a perception of me and not trying to appeal to any sensitivities.

In post 3656, FakeGod wrote:Countdown to deadline: 1 day, 5 hours, 23 minutes

So... probably time today to finish this?

Once tammy is satisfied.

I'm fine.

Kinda spinning my wheels and finding more reasons to suspect everyone at this point, which isn't helpful.