Mafiascum.net

also anything you say about popularity literally has nothing to do with my alignment so it's weird that this is the tack you're going with :/

In post 3720, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think MathBlade is arguing in good faith right now.

I think that regardless of his alignment, math is currently tilted.

But, he just keeps posting anyways.

In post 3480, Bell wrote:

In post 3471, T-Bone wrote:

In post 3440, Frogsterking wrote:Aaa fuck that's the grenade dropping I was trying to stop.

In post 3443, Bell wrote:

In post 3442, T-Bone wrote:Far be it for me to jump to conclusions but there's one conclusion I immediately jump to.

I don’t know what conclusions you’re reaching?

That post is so out of context I think it was meant for a PT

I had a convo earlier in the game about Frog, Granade throwing. It’s in reference to that.
Though, I thought they did it intentionally as a reaction test

lol

In post 3720, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think MathBlade is arguing in good faith right now.

+1

In post 3725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also anything you say about popularity literally has nothing to do with my alignment so it's weird that this is the tack you're going with :/

Yeah like I wouldn’t yeet you in a hot nanosecond if I thought you were actually scum here.

In post 3725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also anything you say about popularity literally has nothing to do with my alignment so it's weird that this is the tack you're going with :/

My point is that if I was scum I do attack you because you’re never elimmed

As scum it’s hella easy to fake reads

And I keep posting because I keep getting asked questions

Like strongly pushing anyone is so easy to do for cred.

I am very very good at generating towncred as scum because it’s so easy

The only problem comes in when you piss people off

I pissed people off for asking you talk to each other

I called I would be wagoned

I was right

I can’t defend myself because defense never works

So gg no re

If I push it’s always bad faith

There is literally nothing I can do that is protown

In post 3483, MathBlade wrote:I think NKA is one of the best ways to catch scum.

nka is pog

Let me fucking catch up and stop slandering me every three seconds with obviously false bullshit

you could hunt for scum and make a case for someone being scum?

complaining about me being never elimmed is um.. not useful for anything?

In post 3496, Malakittens wrote:

In post 3471, T-Bone wrote:

In post 3440, Frogsterking wrote:Aaa fuck that's the grenade dropping I was trying to stop.

In post 3443, Bell wrote:

In post 3442, T-Bone wrote:Far be it for me to jump to conclusions but there's one conclusion I immediately jump to.

I don’t know what conclusions you’re reaching?

That post is so out of context I think it was meant for a PT

But but

Scum don’t have daytalk

So no

Good point XD

In post 3535, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3531, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 3518, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3515, Frogsterking wrote:Yup Math is town.

Also, I feel like one of the replacements is probably scum

Why?

Replacements are more likely overall to be scum. I think context is important though. In this context I think players on a scum team who fall behind in a large game are more likely to replace out due to guilt of letting the team down.

So I see there have been several rep-outs already and I'm thinking that the rep-out pool is a better place to hunt than the entire player list.

Except this is fundamentally wrong.

Replace outs are indicative of a player not playing/wanting to play/busy/RL/bans or millions of reasons.

Some games have replace outs from all town because town is losing or lack of cooperation or unfun.

This game is insanely large and we (from where I have caught up to) haven’t had a single wagon all fucking game except Cephrir and maybe one other person. That’s demoralizing

It's not fundamentally wrong dude, you are uninformed. These people at stanford used this very website as a corpus and showed that replace outs are more likely to be scum. You can find the corpus yourself online easily.

In post 3732, MathBlade wrote:Let me fucking catch up and stop slandering me every three seconds with obviously false bullshit

No no I am pro NKA that's why I called it pog

In post 3726, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 3720, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think MathBlade is arguing in good faith right now.

I think that regardless of his alignment, math is currently tilted.

But, he just keeps posting anyways.

He was tilted in PYP too but for very different reasons. There he was upset that his reads weren’t getting listened to.

In post 3721, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3707, Bellaphant wrote:@johnny, don't have one, would be shocked if it didn't involve at least one you, mala, ceph or pp. Then maybe bell.

P-edit I don't want you to be Bella like? I'm saying that I'm surprised at how difficult I am finding it to read you this game.

Can you explain a bit about how you are reading me right now?

Is it ok if I do this in the morning? It'd really help me actually If you could give me a few sentences about where your head in the game is overall - what do you think is going on with the wagons, any replacements that have shifted your thinking, anything that's stood out as particularly scumny/towny, etc.

In post 3733, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you could hunt for scum and make a case for someone being scum?

complaining about me being never elimmed is um.. not useful for anything?

I did that yesterday

And today

And tried to form a townblock

But you just spam “but math is scum”

So I have to spend 10000 posts arguing I am town against “Corwin is aggro”
Then moving the damn goal posts

Versus building a town block which is remarkably protown

ok who do you think is scum and what's the case again?

I want to talk my reads and catch up

But instead there’s this flash wagon on absolute bullshit.

Where no one talks a single read I have

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection

Read it and weep "Math"Blade

In post 3740, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok who do you think is scum and what's the case again?

Again I don’t have a single locked scumread

Frog is bad based on the VCA when I came in
Klick is bad for some of their posting

If I could label Bell a neutral I would

Lukewarm’s post with reads and who he’s willing to elim matches my list pretty much

In post 3739, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3733, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you could hunt for scum and make a case for someone being scum?

complaining about me being never elimmed is um.. not useful for anything?

I did that yesterday

And today

And tried to form a townblock

But you just spam “but math is scum”

So I have to spend 10000 posts arguing I am town against “Corwin is aggro”
Then moving the damn goal posts

Versus building a town block which is remarkably protown

Or ignore him?

Like, yes. Pooky was calling you scum.

But there was also multiple slots defending you. Off the top of my head, Me, Both heads of Dancing Puppets, OTH all made posts about stopping your wagon.

The thread did not need 10000 posts from you arguing with Pooky.

In post 3702, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 3699, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hey Bella what's your hero solve

Johnny, if you asked me this question I might just cry.

It's fun! Mafia's fun

In post 3712, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 3695, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Is that Nancy

yeah

Did we ever hydra?

In post 3742, Frogsterking wrote:https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection

Read it and weep "Math"Blade

I have way too much to read right now.

What’s the subject and premise and I will get to it after I take a break and such

This is Town!Math because of the irrational insistence that I'm scum.

In post 3735, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 3535, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3531, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 3518, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3515, Frogsterking wrote:Yup Math is town.

Also, I feel like one of the replacements is probably scum

Why?

Replacements are more likely overall to be scum. I think context is important though. In this context I think players on a scum team who fall behind in a large game are more likely to replace out due to guilt of letting the team down.

So I see there have been several rep-outs already and I'm thinking that the rep-out pool is a better place to hunt than the entire player list.

Except this is fundamentally wrong.

Replace outs are indicative of a player not playing/wanting to play/busy/RL/bans or millions of reasons.

Some games have replace outs from all town because town is losing or lack of cooperation or unfun.

This game is insanely large and we (from where I have caught up to) haven’t had a single wagon all fucking game except Cephrir and maybe one other person. That’s demoralizing

It's not fundamentally wrong dude, you are uninformed. These people at stanford used this very website as a corpus and showed that replace outs are more likely to be scum. You can find the corpus yourself online easily.

Yeah but I don’t think RCE and Drap are scum.

In post 3744, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 3739, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3733, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you could hunt for scum and make a case for someone being scum?

complaining about me being never elimmed is um.. not useful for anything?

I did that yesterday

And today

And tried to form a townblock

But you just spam “but math is scum”

So I have to spend 10000 posts arguing I am town against “Corwin is aggro”
Then moving the damn goal posts

Versus building a town block which is remarkably protown

Or ignore him?

Like, yes. Pooky was calling you scum.

But there was also multiple slots defending you. Off the top of my head, Me, Both heads of Dancing Puppets, OTH all made posts about stopping your wagon.

The thread did not need 10000 posts from you arguing with Pooky.

It does

Pooky says someone is scum

That’s it

They’re the elim