Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:42 pm
Meaning I chose not to, and therefore still could.
Vote: Shattered Viewpoint
If he didn't read it he wouldn't have known his alignment.
No elaboration whatsoever.
↑ Quinter wrote:Vote: Jal
I don't like his tone at all. It's way too snarky. His push on AcRv and attack for an OMGUS vote is bad.No elaboration whatsoever.
Pedit: I did say I was going to be inactive, but your attack on me for "hopping on wagons without reasoning" is completely false, brundibar.It's completely true. One line of a shit excuse to hop on a wagon doesn't equal reasoning.
Obviously he superskimmed the thread so much that he wasn't even able to tell that we were talking about a different game.
This sounds like what I would try and say if I were scum trying to find a quick suspect to park my vote on at the start of the day. Also note no elaboration whatsoever. Since when was he even getting pressure in the first place?
Still waiting...
Why is it shitty?
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:I would link to one instance to it, but that was lost in the crash... I'm sure if you looked you could find occassions where it's done. I can understand why they do it too, hence why I'm doing it. I only do it early game so scum don't give me an early town vibe and then mess with me a bit later on.But if they start acting like that once they see your reason for your town reads, then surely that would be suspicious to you wouldn't it? It's a shit reason to not give out your town reads. You aren't just witholding information from the scum, but also from the town.
Or town could be doing it because, you know, it's a TOWN thing to do, and so TOWN are naturally going to do things that TOWN naturally do.So basically anyone who isn't following your towntells is scum. Nice to know.
Where did I say you had to agree with it? I just said that it's not scummy to not explain town readsWhere did I say I had to agree with it? Explain your town reads please. There is nothing to hide.
Uh... you said you had to agree with it here:the quoted part right above wrote:So basically anyone who isn't following your towntells is scum. Nice to know.
If everyone is scum for disagreeing with unexplained townreads, then by that logic I should expect everyone to agree with them. Which I don't. Because you're not scum if you disagree with my town reads. You were the one assuming that. And I remember you saying something earlier...Ommy wrote:Stop assuming things.
No, it meant that anyone who wasn't following your towntells is scum to you. Though I can see how that was a bit ambiguous.
↑ mcqueen wrote:I must say this before Lastsurvivor posts the day ending votecount -
AcRv wrote:Where in my definition did it say "of oneself"? Hm? Yeah, I called it a noun (what happens when you're sleep deprived), but does that change the point? Honestly, that's not even good pedanticism, just stupidity!
I have so much temptation to yell at you how stupid this is, but there is no time for that, and it would be pointless. You explained defending as protecting yourself from an attack (well, I used a different wording, but you get the point). If someone else is getting attacked, and you defend [them], you are defendingyourself, using your definition. Defending someone else isprotecting themfrom an attack, not protecting yourself, then saying it's defending someone else. I know my wording is bad in a lot of this post, but I'm trying to make it quick, but you are naive not to see the flaw in your usage of your definition.
Shattered Viewpoint - Nobody Special. I'll admit, you seemed nothing like the Nobody Special I (half-)know, so now my read may be biased. But I'm going to have to say you're scum. Even if you're an Alt, you aren't playing anything like the town Nobody Special. -Scum
↑ drmyshotgun wrote:Prove it.
↑ Shattered Viewpoint wrote:How do you suggest I do that?
↑ drmyshotgun wrote:Are we supposed to tell if we armed or not?
↑ AcRv wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:I would link to one instance to it, but that was lost in the crash... I'm sure if you looked you could find occassions where it's done. I can understand why they do it too, hence why I'm doing it. I only do it early game so scum don't give me an early town vibe and then mess with me a bit later on.But if they start acting like that once they see your reason for your town reads, then surely that would be suspicious to you wouldn't it? It's a shit reason to not give out your town reads. You aren't just witholding information from the scum, but also from the town.
Or town could be doing it because, you know, it's a TOWN thing to do, and so TOWN are naturally going to do things that TOWN naturally do.So basically anyone who isn't following your towntells is scum. Nice to know.
Where did I say you had to agree with it? I just said that it's not scummy to not explain town readsWhere did I say I had to agree with it? Explain your town reads please. There is nothing to hide.
Uh... you said you had to agree with it here:the quoted part right above wrote:So basically anyone who isn't following your towntells is scum. Nice to know.
If everyone is scum for disagreeing with unexplained townreads, then by that logic I should expect everyone to agree with them. Which I don't. Because you're not scum if you disagree with my town reads. You were the one assuming that. And I remember you saying something earlier...Ommy wrote:Stop assuming things.
No, it meant that anyone who wasn't following your towntells is scum to you. Though I can see how that was a bit ambiguous.
Disagreeing with people isn't scummyThat was you who said that :V I said the bolded bit at the end.
But have there been any other town flips the previous times you did this? Why does a town-flip previously have an impact on a scum-flip this game?
As for Quinter... I'm hesitant to go on him because last time I played with someone not posting content they promised they flipped town... so I'm really hesitant to vote there at the moment.
But have there been any other town flips the previous times you did this? Why does a town-flip previously have an impact on a scum-flip this game?