Mafiascum.net

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 371, GuyInFreezer wrote:It's Mara/Al, isn't it.

You

are

good with the WIFOM. I'll give you that

That post was damn serious.

In post 373, TheIrishPope wrote:Alright, so, SMM didn't post, and your read of him changed
The feck?

Alstro is scum
GIF is null
That's it

And there's your epileptic cheerleader...

GIF is always serious
(defending my scumbuddy, wayne, if you haven't noticed)

In post 375, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 371, GuyInFreezer wrote:It's Mara/Al, isn't it.

You

are

good with the WIFOM. I'll give you that

That post was damn serious.

Well, could you expound on it for us slow folk?

In post 373, TheIrishPope wrote:Alright, so, SMM didn't post, and your read of him changed
The feck?

Nice catch.

In post 370, GuyInFreezer wrote: 3 people who he claims that posted less.
Gives townreads on them except for Mara.
Why not Mara?

Why not Mara? Because I want Mara to respond to your accusations of her before I decide whether I think she's town or not.

Your suspicions of Mara seem too weak to justify a lynch ("not being a helpful IC" - really?), and if you're scum I think it be an attempt to distance yourself from her. If we lynch Mara and she flips scum, that'll put you in a fairly good light.

That's just a hypothesis, though. I'm unsure because my suspicion of you is a gut feeling.

In post 379, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 373, TheIrishPope wrote:Alright, so, SMM didn't post, and your read of him changed
The feck?

Nice catch.

I say I was going to reread the thread in my first set of reads.

In post 378, waynegg wrote:

In post 375, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 371, GuyInFreezer wrote:It's Mara/Al, isn't it.

You

are

good with the WIFOM. I'll give you that

That post was damn serious.

Well, could you expound on it for us slow folk?

Not yet.
But consider it as where I am right now.

In post 381, Alstroemeria wrote:

In post 379, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 373, TheIrishPope wrote:Alright, so, SMM didn't post, and your read of him changed
The feck?

Nice catch.

I

did

say I was going to reread the thread in my first set of reads.

Ok then.
Tell me which part of his post changed your read on him.
Of course, you also get to explain why you thought him as null and town now.

In post 375, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 371, GuyInFreezer wrote:It's Mara/Al, isn't it.

You

are

good with the WIFOM. I'll give you that

That post was damn serious.

Well, I'll be much more interested in this if Pope flips town. For now, and looking back at Al's ISO, she did allude to she would be actively reading and rereading the thread. I'm not weighting her read changes to heavily .

I don't like sudden read-changes.
I don't like it even more when the reason is "reread" and nothing else.

Shoulda read the pedits...meh.

Pedit- read that one. GiF really doesn't like read changes. Like at all.

In post 386, waynegg wrote:GiF really doesn't like

out-of-nowhere sudden

read changes.

FTFY.

In post 387, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 386, waynegg wrote:GiF really doesn't like

out-of-nowhere sudden

read changes.

FTFY.

In post 383, GuyInFreezer wrote: Of course, you also get to explain why you thought him as null and town now.

I gave SMM a null the first time around because I was concentrating on trying to work out what was going on between Waynegg and TIP. On rereading, I liked his #85, #121 and #124 and thought they read townish.

Besides, I gave just about everyone except those waynegg and GIF a null in my first reads. You even commented on it.

ok then.
Explain the rest of them.

And I know Mara is active scumlurking because she's in the chat

your post is missing a vote.

attaboy.

Oh christ... I wanted this game to be more active... but not THIS active!

In post 198, Ms Marangal wrote:Regarding voodoo?

In post 107, Voodoo Lady wrote:

In post 103, TheIrishPope wrote:It's town motivated to ask what kind of puppy everyone is? Wow

ANSWER THE F!@#$ING QUESTION, POPE!!!

WHAT KIND OF PUPPY ARE YOU???!?!!?

This post.

Hey, Marangal.

Look, sweetheart... We've played with each other quite a few times. Heck, we've even been lovers together. We know each others' playstyles pretty well. So riddle me this: do I usually direct my queries in the form of large, angry all-caps demands? 107 was intentionally hyperbolic-- hence the huge bolded text and exclamation marks.

In post 211, waynegg wrote:

In post 83, Voodoo Lady wrote:

In post 82, waynegg wrote:And I still want to know what kind of puppy everyone pictures themselves as...

I've always imagined myself as a Pomeranian. I'm quite fluffy. :0)

Huh...rereading is good, because I missed this. Three times. Going back to my RQS and what I was looking for with part A to that question, fluffy is one of those key words which would distance oneself from a scum RC. Then once I fully explained my play...

In post 109, Voodoo Lady wrote:Saw this explanation coming from a mile away.

Perhaps I've had my tunnel glasses on after all...

I would describe myself as a fluffy Pomeranian as scum, yep. But I'd also do that as town because I love Pomeranians.



It's Pope's refusal to answer the question and his repeated denial of its significance that gives us the reliable tell.

Also, GIF. Is your vote on Marangal solely because she's inactive, or is there some deeper motivation behind it I've overlooked? Because if so--

In post 64, Voodoo Lady wrote:Why vote for someone who's inactive? Like, seriously-- what's your motivation here? [Marangal] is not suddenly going to wake up in the middle of the night and make a post here just because you voted for [her].

Pope's reasoning for self-voting is laughably bad, but I think that's already apparent here.

In post 396, Voodoo Lady wrote:Also, GIF. Is your vote on Marangal solely because she's inactive, or is there some deeper motivation behind it I've overlooked?

There is a deeper motivation behind it You've overlooked and I'm not willing to say it until she shows up.

scratch the overlooked part because I never mentioned it in the thread so you'll never find it unless I say it.

In post 396, Voodoo Lady wrote:Why vote for someone who's inactive? Like, seriously-- what's your motivation here? [Marangal] is not suddenly going to wake up in the middle of the night and make a post here just because you voted for [her].

Pressure, beetlejuice, name them all!
Also what if I know her general non-sleeping time?