Page 16 of 56
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:16 pm
by Jake from State Farm
and if there are any ladies in this game, my apologies as that was probably disgusting for you to read.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:17 pm
by Darox
Ah hah.
Ah hah.
Give me the scumpicks parker. These aren't contractually binding, just throw them out.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:21 pm
by Jake from State Farm
Kid A
Player yet to be determined
Player yet to be determined
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:24 pm
by Darox
Why is Kid A scum?
How have you formulated all your previous posts without noticing the other 8 players in the game?
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:28 pm
by Amrun
Not sure why just ladies, but it's all right. I'm a big girl.
Not having any reads besides kid a is less all right.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:47 pm
by Jake from State Farm
In post 378, Darox wrote:Why is Kid A scum?
How have you formulated all your previous posts without noticing the other 8 players in the game?
because he has provided no reads, made no legitimate attempts to scum hunt, tunnels a player for most of the pages and when a new player comes in attacks the old slot calling implying like his slot was the scummiest of the game despite not mentioning him at all except a lone reasonless vote and when he finally does give a reason for it's vote it's essentially for being ok with a policy lynch (null) and for him calling a player scum for pushing a bandwagon (the person moz was calling scum just happened to be kid's largest scum read) and when I call him on the fact that he and moz were attacking the same person, he now does a 180 and says Darox isn't his a scum read anymore. Not to mention his iso fits my definition of active lurking cause when he shows up he seems to know exactly what's going on yet not sharing any info with anyone.
That's why he is scum.
@ amrun - I have not yet read the game yet, so I don't have reads. :shrug:
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:48 pm
by Jake from State Farm
and I probably won't get to it until Sunday/Monday now
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:49 pm
by TheIrishPope
Jake, then you'll support me on my Ingrid case, yes?
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:58 pm
by Jake from State Farm
I'm going to read beginning to end, but ill tell you I have trouble believing in you given your history.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:01 pm
by Darox
In post 378, Darox wrote:How have you formulated all your previous posts without noticing the other 8 players in the game?
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:20 pm
by Jake from State Farm
All of my posts have revolved around 1 player's iso and the rest was based on what was happening real time.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:41 pm
by Mr. Flay
In post 355, TheIrishPope wrote:Flay, let's talk a bit, shall we? What's your favourite alignment: Mafia, Town, or some obscure third party?
I like all of them about equally, actually. Townie better than PR, but other than that, don't give me Jester (I lost) and I'm happy. I'm better as scum than town overall, and better at late game than early.
Also, this is probably the spammiest I've played since...ever. It's interesting, though I can't swear I'll be able to keep up the activity level this high as things go on.
I like Jack from Progressive so far. Way better than his predecessor, which makes me think perhaps moz was just lazy/dumb/overly busy.
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:45 pm
by notscience
Moz was kinda sporadic towards the end of Sitcom too.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:45 am
by Mr. Flay
Just finished rereading spicer and Kid A. Definitely like my vote where it is. He's totally misrepresenting gorckat, given that it's not a policy lynch on TIP, it's a better-than-average D1 lynch. If the guy is indistinguishable as scum or town, we'll never know who he is. So without good scumhunting (which hasn't really shown up so far), he's a fucking liability.
Also, this bodes well:
In post 369, gorckat wrote:Vla over weekend. Have phone but laptop
dyong
.
Will prob be unable to resist typos from
phome
posting.
Will
syrive
for succinct
amd
clear thoughts.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:27 am
by Amrun
Mr. Flay, I disagree with that one.
Gorckat has openly called it a policy lynch.
I don't think straight up policy lynch is the way to go, here -- yeah, he is probably a liability, but he did link to meta where he was effective. I think he is a better lynch than most others IF there is a reason to suspect he might be scum.
I think there's enough validity to calling him scum that I'm good with lynching him, but not if everyone else on the lynch is there purely for policy.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:22 am
by Kid A
why would town just jump in a game and start building a case on the person voting them
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:26 am
by notscience
OMGUS is a null tell Kid.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:23 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 390, Kid A wrote:
why would town just jump in a game and start building a case on the person voting them
the better question would be Why would scum?
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:27 am
by Jake from State Farm
it wasn't the vote that bothered me, because I honestly don't care about the vote. What struck me as odd is the fact that your comment associated with the vote implied that moza had been scummy. When I went through your iso to see what you said about my slot, I couldn't find a single thing.
and again , I don't think you answered my question. Why did you not question moza earlier, why did you wait til he replaced out and could not defend himself?
and yet again, you told OTHER people that once darox responded to his wagon you would provide your top 3 scum list. Why have you not done that yet? The fact that you look like you are stalling in giving your reads is very suspicious.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:28 am
by Jake from State Farm
also answer this question please
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:29 am
by Amrun
Jake, why did you look through kid a's ISO just because he voted moza? Did you also read moza's ISO?
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:30 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 395, Amrun wrote:Jake, why did you look through kid a's ISO just because he voted moza? Did you also read moza's ISO?
I already answered that in post 393
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:33 am
by Amrun
No, you didn't.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:33 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 393, Jake from State Farm wrote:. What struck me as odd is the fact that your comment associated with the vote implied that moza had been scummy. When I went through your iso to see what you said about my slot, I couldn't find a single thing.
yes, yes I did
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:36 am
by Amrun
No, see, that paragraph is what prompted my questions. Therefore, it does not answer them.
You wouldn't know that kid A was just now calling mozamis scummy without isoing him, so what was the initial reasoning to do so?
Did you also ISO mozamis? Before, or after, if so?