Mafiascum.net

In post 372, Trust Fund wrote:huh. NO idea why that first quote is there. But anyways, i didn't see it as a misrep, so whatever.

~sasha

Walk me through how it wasn't a misrep. When he said "I didn't like it" he was referring to my reaction to matt's gambit. You bolded the last sentence, in which he said the gambit helped town, as if he was simultaneously saying he didn't like it but it benefitted town. What you did was the very definition of a misrep.

In post 369, No Brains Here wrote:

In post 353, sangres wrote:So mollie did you notice that Nacho is doing for stupendous exactly what he did for me in the Xenoblade game?

which was...?

Gave him some space to catch a breath and calm down which ultimately helps town get a more accurate read and makes it possible for a reasoned lynch rather than a kneejerk.

In post 368, Desperado wrote:

In post 361, StupendousKey wrote:

In post 345, Desperado wrote:With that said you proclaimed Trust Fundscum before he said that, so can you tell me what it was when you said it then?

Initial vote was a reaction test, but his fluff posts and recent misrep have solidified my read.

Matt's aggressiveness is super town.

-SM

Really? You gave up and called Trust as scum as your presumptive last words and all you can say now is it was a reaction test?

I could lie and bullshit here, but I'll be honest and tell you that I didn't really think Trust Fund was scum until recently. Those were my presumptive last words since I basically had no other scum reads (yes, you are on my town list). But each new post of his is confirming my read.

In post 372, Trust Fund wrote:huh. NO idea why that first quote is there. But anyways, i didn't see it as a misrep, so whatever.

~sasha

In post 329, StupendousKey wrote: I didn't like it

because it looked opportunistic, especially since

his gambit benefited town.

How about now? Do you see it now?

I know everyone is like allowing no brains here to Judy do what they please but keep in mind the slot is scum and will be lynched tomorrow

Perhaps I should have seperated them and explained, but I thought it was obvious they were two different thoughts. "I didn't like it" is a bad response to your reaction because it's vague and shitty. The second thing is a scumclaim because there's no way for him to know that it benefited town for sure... unless he knew who town was.

That's what I get for doing that post quickly I suppose.

Make sense now?

~sasha

In post 377, StupendousKey wrote:I could lie and bullshit here, but I'll be honest and tell you that I didn't really think Trust Fund was scum until recently. Those were my presumptive last words since I basically had no other scum reads (yes, you are on my town list). But each new post of his is confirming my read.

What are your reads?

VOTE: Trust Fund

it pains me to kill you right now, but you seriously did not do that to SK's post, no matter how terrible they are C

~Sugar

In post 360, MattP wrote:This is why we should be speedlynching

So that stupid conversations can be avoided

Stay strong guys

NOTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID HAS IN ANY WAY MADE STUPENDOUS MORE LIKELY TO BE TOWN

I am more of a head before the ass type of gal

I don't want him speedlynched can you guys at the very least give me a chance to talk to dgb ffs

eta: jesus christ is there any possibility of a jester

VOTE: sangres

In post 373, Trust Fund wrote:

In post 370, sangres wrote:I don't remembr that. All I remember is a vast sea of pitchforks and torches.

Like hell you don't remeber white knighting the shit out of me as you went down.

~Sasha

I remember whiteknighting you. I don't remember you thinking I was town. A lot of peoiple waffled and eventually voted me. I don't remember what your consistent stance was. I was at the bottom of a pile-on for most of that game day.

In post 342, Desperado wrote:

In post 337, Majiffy wrote:Look at Posh Mafia, or Xenoblade mafia, or any game I've ever modded, you'll probably find examples.

ICBA.

I meant in this game.

In post 342, Desperado wrote: What does he do if it never slows down?

And you seriously couldn't get me policy lynched if you tried.

Replaces out, like aforementioned players do

And yes, I probably could.

In post 348, No Brains Here wrote:majiffy you better trust my read sangres I mean how many times do I need to fucking prove it

Wut? Are you not reading Sangres as town? Because I'm reading Sangres as pretty clearly obviously town.

and, as much as I don't like SK right now, I really don't like how fast the wagon is going, and I really, really do not like how they aren't really doing anything to keep it from actually happening

~Sugar

In post 379, MattP wrote:I know everyone is like allowing no brains here to Judy do what they please but keep in mind the slot is scum and will be lynched tomorrow

Good to know. Maybe you should open up your thoughts a little bit and consider someone who's actually scum.

Gotta go eat dinner. Be back soon.

In post 380, Trust Fund wrote:Perhaps I should have seperated them and explained, but I thought it was obvious they were two different thoughts. "I didn't like it" is a bad response to your reaction because it's vague and shitty. The second thing is a scumclaim because there's no way for him to know that it benefited town for sure... unless he knew who town was.

That's what I get for doing that post quickly I suppose.

Make sense now?

~sasha

That's a really plausible explanation for what you could have meant. Now if only you had led with that instead of claiming multiple times that you didn't misrep him even though several other people independently called you out on it, I could say you were town. I guess it'll have to be null for now.



Do you have anything to add to the game that doesn't have to do with defending Stupendous?

In post 380, Trust Fund wrote:Perhaps I should have seperated them and explained, but I thought it was obvious they were two different thoughts. "I didn't like it" is a bad response to your reaction because it's vague and shitty. The second thing is a scumclaim because there's no way for him to know that it benefited town for sure... unless he knew who town was.

That's what I get for doing that post quickly I suppose.

Make sense now?

~sasha

That's a really plausible explanation for what you could have meant. Now if only you had led with that instead of claiming multiple times that you didn't misrep him even though several other people independently called you out on it, I could say you were town. I guess it'll have to be null for now.



Do you have anything to add to the game that doesn't have to do with defending Stupendous?

In post 383, No Brains Here wrote:

In post 360, MattP wrote:This is why we should be speedlynching

So that stupid conversations can be avoided

Stay strong guys

NOTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID HAS IN ANY WAY MADE STUPENDOUS MORE LIKELY TO BE TOWN

I am more of a head before the ass type of gal

I don't want him speedlynched can you guys at the very least give me a chance to talk to dgb ffs

eta: jesus christ is there any possibility of a jester

FERY WAS SCUM IN THAT GAME

VOTE: sangres

Yeah no kidding. So what? Nacho is doing for Stupendous exactly what he did for me in that game. If it wasn't scummy of him then, it's not scummy of him now.

In post 373, Trust Fund wrote:

In post 370, sangres wrote:I don't remembr that. All I remember is a vast sea of pitchforks and torches.

Like hell you don't remeber white knighting the shit out of me as you went down.

~Sasha

qft

I had to bully the fuck out of cabd to vote 2

where did the jester comment come from Mollie/

~Sugar

In post 383, No Brains Here wrote:eta: jesus christ is there any possibility of a jester FERY WAS SCUM IN THAT GAME

But I was't...?

In post 380, Trust Fund wrote:Perhaps I should have seperated them and explained, but I thought it was obvious they were two different thoughts. "I didn't like it" is a bad response to your reaction because it's vague and shitty. The second thing is a scumclaim because there's no way for him to know that it benefited town for sure... unless he knew who town was.

That's what I get for doing that post quickly I suppose.

Make sense now?

~sasha

And you're taking it out of context too because that was a reply to Desparado's question about why SK didn't like D's vote.

VOTE: TRUSTFUND

eta: and even then he wasn't happy about it

In post 385, Majiffy wrote:

In post 342, Desperado wrote:

In post 337, Majiffy wrote:Look at Posh Mafia, or Xenoblade mafia, or any game I've ever modded, you'll probably find examples.

ICBA.

I meant in this game.

In post 342, Desperado wrote: What does he do if it never slows down?

And you seriously couldn't get me policy lynched if you tried.

Replaces out, like aforementioned players do

all the time regardless of alignment.

And yes, I probably could.

In post 348, No Brains Here wrote:majiffy you better trust my read sangres I mean how many times do I need to fucking prove it

Wut? Are you not reading Sangres as town? Because I'm reading Sangres as pretty clearly obviously town.

Did you post a GIF because you know your claim that "That's the reaction that every player would have" is totally bullshit? Because I already pointed out how Mastin's reaction was different.

And no, you really, really couldn't.

Sugar Cain is scum

MOving on

Stupendous
No brains
Sugar

Pedit: you're not going to convince me of shit stupendous. You scumtelled hard and maybe some people will by into your bs but I won't. I'll be your biggest obstacle until the day you're dead enjoy the ride

In post 395, Jon Doe wrote:

In post 380, Trust Fund wrote:Perhaps I should have seperated them and explained, but I thought it was obvious they were two different thoughts. "I didn't like it" is a bad response to your reaction because it's vague and shitty. The second thing is a scumclaim because there's no way for him to know that it benefited town for sure... unless he knew who town was.

That's what I get for doing that post quickly I suppose.

Make sense now?

~sasha

And you're taking it out of context too because that was a reply to Desparado's question about why SK didn't like D's vote.

VOTE: TRUSTFUND

380 was a direct reply to Desperado himself. So no, it's not out of context.

~Sasha