Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:26 pm
First thing.
Mae's 'jump off the Paris sewer' reference makes me think there might actually be some validity here. If only because I figured if it
Then again, shos already claimed to be town with one of (he thought) the villains. So fiik.
But it's one of those things that if it is a legit claim, it's one that scum is either forced to keep alive due to suspicion that will rise if he doesn't die - but at the same time doesn't benefit them because ahaha bodyguard.
Hmm.
Oh. Whoops. /rant
Anyway, I'm good with that unvote.
Mae's 'jump off the Paris sewer' reference makes me think there might actually be some validity here. If only because I figured if it
was
a reference, it was either one for Valjean or Marius. Well, that and fakeclaiming Valjean would be prettttty ballsy out the gate.Then again, shos already claimed to be town with one of (he thought) the villains. So fiik.
But it's one of those things that if it is a legit claim, it's one that scum is either forced to keep alive due to suspicion that will rise if he doesn't die - but at the same time doesn't benefit them because ahaha bodyguard.
Hmm.
Oh look, a question I posed to Mae that I can still direct to their replacement!In post 364, Ghostlin wrote: The difference between Mhork and the rest of the Unholy Axis of Voting is that Mhork has pushed this to the point of opportunism. Elle, I could buy as town because Mhork needs a read to crib off of, and so GG. I'm still not buying the whole 'it's a coincidence' bullshit that one third of town has a voting bloc; I'm thinking one, maybe two of them are scum, and I find the interactions between Elle and Mhork...soft in the gut, but you guys want to flip me? Fine. The role's created to be disposable. But if you don't fucking look at who's on my wagon and the close, almost bizarre association that Elle and Mhork have set up for themselves DAY FUCKING ONE---this loss of this game I wipe my hands on.
Also, why do you find Mhork and I's closeness more suspicious than Grim and I's twining?In post 172, elleheathen wrote: So do you think close = scum and that we walked into this as scum partners drawing a direct line to the other? Or do you think one of us is scum and is using our familiarity (because the fact that we just got out of a game together has already been discussed in thread) with the other to buddy a town? What do you make of the closeness/interactions?
^This. This is what has me leaning more towards town on you than anything else atm. The fact that admit that you 'can't defend Mae' - which is what I found so off about mastin's approach with OMGSHE'SSOTOWN in the face of her craptastic play and misreps. I still don't get it - I still don't understand it and either he's justIn post 364, Ghostlin wrote: I can't defend Mae--her play is admittedly pretty fucking dreadful--except to say the lack of engagement reads to me in a Town aspect as a player with a protection role that doesn't want to be outed. That said, that's almost newbie town and Mae's been around since 2009, so she might not be...good at this to begin with.
that good
or he knows
that she would have flipped town and was accumulating alllll the white knighting town points ever as scum. But then he posted that wall of reasons for why he saw her as OMGSOTOWN and though I completely
disagree with it, it seemed somehow less like scum and more like stubborn town.Oh. Whoops. /rant
Anyway, I'm good with that unvote.
Orlyyyyy?In post 374, Lord Mhork wrote: Elle, bv or funky?