Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:14 pm
I don't really think the gambits are particularly similar, mine was well thought out + owned
I am surprised this answer was good enough for you muffinmanIn post 331, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I think I've been pretty clear on my opinion of Lost Butterfly and baldeagle, but I don't remember anything Voided has done so I don't have one there.
I have an idea cooking up that's kind of a compromise. I don't know if it's any good though.In post 365, Pyrotechnics wrote:Can you please comment on my idea that neighborizer should claim because I know you have to have read to that part especially since it was like the first post. Thanks.
you're being a useless sack of shit. i don't see a point in further questioning right now.upside down wrote:I am surprised this answer was good enough for you muffinman
(You probably should have at least not revealed that, since it's at least a vaguely subtle role interaction that might not be thought of)In post 377, Garuda wrote:If someone gets Neighborized N1, then I think it's more likely that the slot with that power is town.
it's probably very similar to the last time you askedIn post 378, zMuffinMan wrote:what's your current read on voided?
this?In post 342, Voidedmafia wrote:But...But...That's not true!In post 339, Garuda wrote:(Also, hi Voided, sorry you're scum in this game.)
Mine?Lost Butterfly wrote:actually I kind of liked his response to empire's vote.
In post 379, Lost Butterfly wrote:(You probably should have at least not revealed that, since it's at least a vaguely subtle role interaction that might not be thought of)In post 377, Garuda wrote:If someone gets Neighborized N1, then I think it's more likely that the slot with that power is town.
I'd also say the neighbouriser just claiming day 2 is effectively the same as day 1, anyway. I don't think I'd be wanting to claim neighbouriser if I had it, for instance.
... you think that's what i was saying?lb wrote:I agree with upside down's 372 in regards to Muffinman.
Your read on me is pretty much based on my read on LB, so...yeah.In post 386, zMuffinMan wrote:... you think that's what i was saying?
aw c'monIn post 378, zMuffinMan wrote:you're being a useless sack of shit. i don't see a point in further questioning right now.
Possibly. I just think that part of what helped us win the last game was transparency in the town. I don't see why the neighborizer is going yo instantly die, it's not that powerful of a role in the hands of town.In post 377, Garuda wrote:I have an idea cooking up that's kind of a compromise. I don't know if it's any good though.In post 365, Pyrotechnics wrote:Can you please comment on my idea that neighborizer should claim because I know you have to have read to that part especially since it was like the first post. Thanks.
My thought process is this: I obviously see the dangers of scum winning the power but it could also be immensely powerful for town (doubly so given the number of hydras here) and I don't want the Neighborizer instantly claiming if town and then dying immediately. But what about the slot that gets Neighborized claiming on D2? The potential Neighborizer / Cop combo is ineffective if both are used N1. If someone gets Neighborized N1, then I think it's more likely that the slot with that power is town.
I don't know this all sounded decent in my head. What do you think?
How do you think it differs from Lord Mhork's reaction to you? And to what extent do you think the difference is due to follow-up vs vote?In post 381, Lost Butterfly wrote:actually I kind of liked his response to empire's vote.
i'd ask you to explain the disadvantages of waiting but I don't think you actually canIn post 385, Pyrotechnics wrote:I don't believe you think this.
and that's kind of not true, depending on if it gets lucky with a neighbourise or whatever. the only advantage of having the neighbouriser claim today is...we know who the neighbouriser is and can judge their targets. if they claim tomorrow we can do the exact same thing and they've stayed hidden for a night. if scum have it they're probably not going to be willing to claim it either way (or are, and this won't change depending on when we make them claim)Possibly. I just think that part of what helped us win the last game was transparency in the town. I don't see why the neighborizer is going yo instantly die, it's not that powerful of a role in the hands of town.
In post 390, Pyrotechnics wrote:Possibly. I just think that part of what helped us win the last game was transparency in the town. I don't see why the neighborizer is going yo instantly die, it's not that powerful of a role in the hands of town.In post 377, Garuda wrote:I have an idea cooking up that's kind of a compromise. I don't know if it's any good though.In post 365, Pyrotechnics wrote:Can you please comment on my idea that neighborizer should claim because I know you have to have read to that part especially since it was like the first post. Thanks.
My thought process is this: I obviously see the dangers of scum winning the power but it could also be immensely powerful for town (doubly so given the number of hydras here) and I don't want the Neighborizer instantly claiming if town and then dying immediately. But what about the slot that gets Neighborized claiming on D2? The potential Neighborizer / Cop combo is ineffective if both are used N1. If someone gets Neighborized N1, then I think it's more likely that the slot with that power is town.
I don't know this all sounded decent in my head. What do you think?
no it isn't. and you know this. the initial read on you came from your entrance to the game, and i talked a little about why i didn't like this at all. then there's your prohawk vote while saying baldeagle looked like he was out of his depth, followed by a revote on bald. my issues with your LB read came after that.voided wrote:Your read on me is pretty much based on my read on LB, so...yeah.
Uh, sure. k.In post 395, zMuffinMan wrote:no it isn't. and you know this. the initial read on you came from your entrance to the game, and i talked a little about why i didn't like this at all. then there's your prohawk vote while saying baldeagle looked like he was out of his depth, followed by a revote on bald. my issues with your LB read came after that
I don't understand the last bit? I think the difference comes in the directness of voided and the way he meets empire (a stronger player) head on. mhork just kind of beats around the bush, presses questions, treats me as town and then is like "i'm not scum, this is a mislynch". do you think i'm not being objective because he's voting me or something, because whle it's possible I don't think it's what's happening here.In post 392, morph the cat wrote:How do you think it differs from Lord Mhork's reaction to you? And to what extent do you think the difference is due to follow-up vs vote?In post 381, Lost Butterfly wrote:actually I kind of liked his response to empire's vote.
In post 393, Lost Butterfly wrote:i'd ask you to explain the disadvantages of waiting but I don't think you actually canIn post 385, Pyrotechnics wrote:I don't believe you think this.
and that's kind of not true, depending on if it gets lucky with a neighbourise or whatever. the only advantage of having the neighbouriser claim today is...we know who the neighbouriser is and can judge their targets. if they claim tomorrow we can do the exact same thing and they've stayed hidden for a night. if scum have it they're probably not going to be willing to claim it either way (or are, and this won't change depending on when we make them claim)Possibly. I just think that part of what helped us win the last game was transparency in the town. I don't see why the neighborizer is going yo instantly die, it's not that powerful of a role in the hands of town.